Skip to comments.
Pickering: Wasn't "Necessary" To Question Clinton In Benghazi Report [VIDEO]
RealClearPolitics ^
| May 12th, 2013
| Face the Nation/ Bob Scheiffer
Posted on 05/12/2013 2:31:19 PM PDT by Third Person
Thomas Pickering - the former UN ambassador who along with former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. Mike Mullen prepared the Accountability Review Board report on the State Department's handling of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya - says he didn't think it was necessary to interview former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "because in fact we knew where the responsibility rested."
BOB SCHIEFFER: And good morning again. Ambassador Thomas Pickering is the one who led the State Department's investigation into how those Benghazi attacks where handled. Mr. Ambassador, you and I have known one another as you had various posts in the government for many, many years. You headed this investigation. But the three state department employees who testified this week where frustrated with the report--they said it was incomplete, one of them, Greg Hicks, even told investigators his words, not mine, it let people off the hook. Is that a fair criticism?
AMBASSADOR PICKERING: I don't believe so and I think that's an unfair criticism. They've tried to point a finger at people more senior than where we found the decisions were made. The decisions were made and reviewed at the level that we fixed responsibility for failures of performance.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Vermont; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abdication; arb; arkansas; benghazi; berniesanders; blackberry; canada; cba; clinton; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; coverup; election2016; halfass; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; horsecrap; humaabedin; incompetence; iran; kenyanbornmuzzie; libya; mikemullen; newyork; noduediligence; nointegrity; pages; peterschweizer; pickering; russia; smellsliketreason; soundsliketreason; southcarolina; tedcruz; texas; thomaspickering; treason; treygowdy; trump; uranium; vermont; walksliketreason; waronterror; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
2
posted on
05/12/2013 2:33:50 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: Third Person
They interviewed Secretary Clinton but they didn’t ask her any questions. That must have been some interview.
3
posted on
05/12/2013 2:35:43 PM PDT
by
Homer_J_Simpson
("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
To: Third Person
He also said they did not record any of the statements. How convenient .
4
posted on
05/12/2013 2:38:52 PM PDT
by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
she’s still on her “listening tour”....
5
posted on
05/12/2013 2:39:47 PM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: Third Person
As with all thing Hillary, the buck always stops a couple of layers down.
6
posted on
05/12/2013 2:45:10 PM PDT
by
newheart
(The worst thing the Left ever did was to convince the world it was not a religion.)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
They interviewed Secretary Clinton but they didnt ask her any questions. That must have been some interview. Hey, that's nothing. He also said that because she took full responsibility, she's not responsible for anything.
7
posted on
05/12/2013 2:48:11 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Third Person
8
posted on
05/12/2013 2:48:45 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: crosslink
Riiight. No recordings or transcripts were taken only ‘notes’ were jotted down. That is certainly a professional way to conduct an investigation. ARRGH. What a total flaming crock of rat BS!
9
posted on
05/12/2013 2:54:16 PM PDT
by
JPG
(Stay strong.)
To: onyx
Typical Democrat cover-up. Did anyone expect anything else from this bunch?
10
posted on
05/12/2013 3:02:03 PM PDT
by
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil.)
To: onyx
...says he didn't think it was necessary to interview former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "because in fact we knew where the responsibility rested." Knew the facts ahead of time, did he? Presupposition anyone? Sounds like how they determine globull warming.
11
posted on
05/12/2013 3:09:01 PM PDT
by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: jeffc
I guess the SOS is out of the loop when the POTUS or the VP cannot be awakened!
That’s why they went to VJ to get standown orders!
Even if Bummer was awake it was above his pay grade!
12
posted on
05/12/2013 3:30:05 PM PDT
by
Conserev1
("Still Clinging to my Bible and my Weapon")
To: God luvs America
I thought she was on a drinking tour.
13
posted on
05/12/2013 3:32:10 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: onyx
In other words, Pickering prevaricated about testifying then on the eve of the hearings he said he would (avoiding any pre-briefings). By that time they already had the thing all set up so it was too late.
Nice try Pickering.
To: onyx
Pickering on not questioning Clinton: “I don’t think that there was anything there that we didn’t know.”
Try asking Hillary some questions. You might find out something you didn’t know.
I call BS on his statement.
To: onyx
I have heard alot about who did what. Is there anyone out there that can say factually what the procedure is when a Ambassador is under attack and who calls these shots.
16
posted on
05/12/2013 4:04:24 PM PDT
by
DeWalt
To: Rocky
Nope.
They’re all filthy liars.
17
posted on
05/12/2013 4:05:38 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: jeffc
He’s afraid of the truth!
NOT that Hillary would tell the truth.
18
posted on
05/12/2013 4:06:32 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: what's up
19
posted on
05/12/2013 4:06:58 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: vietvet67
You’re right.
He’s a 32 year career DIPlow-mat, but he’s a Clinton supporter from way back.
20
posted on
05/12/2013 4:07:53 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson