Posted on 11/19/2012 5:37:06 PM PST by Nachum
Georgia lawmakers sat in a seminar involving the UNs controversial Cold War era mind control techniques used to move Agenda 21 forward. The seminar, as could be expected, was roundly mocked by the media even though the UN makes no secret of their abominable plans for the worlds future.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
There was MK-ULTRA too.
Let the media [read: “propaganda arm of the DNC”] mock all they want. I’m shocked a State legislature is taking this seriously.
Forget seminars. We need a ***Star Chamber***!
Just study Jim Jones and Jonestown, not much difference.
As a clinical hypnotist and trained stage hypnotist, it is very easy for me to see the mind control techniques used in both politics and religion. The steps are easy...
1. Allow the volume of your voice to go up and down. Shout and then whisper to get them focused on your voice.
2. Tell a sad story, then a happy one, then a sad. Destabilize their emotions.
3. Knock the destabilized emotions way off center by inducing fear, guilt or anger. Also works to demonize your opponent.
4. Offer them a solution to get rid of their fear, anger or guilt. The group will be in a trance and will have lost discernment abilities.
These techniques, with slight variations were used by Hitler as well as many presidential candidates. This is why people fainted at Obama’s campaign speeches.
I have traveled to many different churches of all types to do research on the techniques in a religious setting. These people will swear on a Bible they are “Born Again.” It has nothing to do with religion. They have just surrendered to the leader rather than to God.
While trained in stage hypnosis, I will never use it as I don’t want the power and the related responsibility for the actions. I very seldom use clinical hypnosis anymore either.
Just a side note: The economy will be crashed in order to cause the big ego’s of people to diminish and slide into emotional trances so that the weeds can hide in the wheat field. Many of you will understand what I am saying. Remember what the master said to the servants about the bad seed.... “Our enemy planted the bad seed while we were asleep!!”
I think you are right on the money. Hitler was a madman, but he could work a crowd. I watched a newsreel where he comes on stage and the audience goes crazy for him and he just crosses his arms and stands there. He stands there so long without saying or doing anything, that you become uncomfortable watching him. Then he starts out slowly and softly. He had them.
P4L
Thanks for this thread on THE OBAMA MIND MELD.
BTW, it has worked very well with the Journalists in the Liberal Agenda Media.
McGill, right?
Ping
.....99, call the Chief, KAOS has infiltrated CONTROL.....
sfl
.
If you want to be on or off the Agenda 21 ping list, please notify me by Freepmail. It is a relatively low volume list in which we have been exploring the UN Agenda21 and related topics. We have collected our studies with threads, links, and discussions on the Agenda 21 thread which can be found here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2738418/posts
NEW ACTION THREAD:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2863065/posts
Post 128 of the Action Thread is a summary of the history of Agenda 21, what they are doing, what to do about it and a good bibliography for further reading.
The first time that I heard Obama speak was at the 2004 Democrat convention. At first I thought he was good, then I noticed the effect that he was having on the Black audience, the way that they were standing, swaying and waving their arms in the air. Then I notice the cadence of Obama’s speech sounded a lot like an old fashioned tent preacher and that he was using emotional buzz words that got the reaction from the audience. Every time he used one of these emotional triggers the crowd started swaying and waving their arms. I knew right then that Obama was dangerous.
Allow me to go a step further in my description of Obama’s souls in order to help you understand why he functions the way he does.
Notice I used the plural of “soul” in Obama. The weeds that hide in the wheat field have interesting characteristics. When an individual is in their logical soul, they are very intelligent and show no emotion. When they are in their emotional soul, they show strong emotion, but do not have access to the intellect. They have a disconnect that does not allow access to both souls at the same time.
Love is the bridge and glue that holds a soul together and allows it to function as “one.” When a weed is present as the logical aspect, Love is not present. (His soul wound that allowed this had to do with the abandonment by both his father and mother.)
This is why Obama utilizes teleprompters, as in order to be emotional and present moving oratory, he must be in his emotional self which does not have access to his intellect. The second reason is that when he is in the logical, his eyes would reflect the logical aspect of his soul as a weed and he cannot risk people discovering that by stepping into his intellect in public... Hint (The intellectual soul is not him! It’s a weed per the tares in the wheat.)
PS. I notice a similar split in the soul of women who are psychics. This is why their personality changes when they channel messages. In most of these situations it is not a weed, but an emotional sub-personality created by a childhood trauma. They step into the emotional sub-personality when they channel. That’s also why they tend to have somewhat masculine personalities when they are not channeling as they shifted into the masculine aspect when they abandoned their wounded emotional sub-personality for emotional protection.
(His soul wound that allowed this had to do with the abandonment by both his father and mother.)
Then compounded by the drug use. It opens the soul to intruders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.