Posted on 07/14/2012 7:05:04 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
ATLANTA, GA - A bold and original animated music video, calling for President Obama to "GET OUT", was released this week by nationally known speaker and Emmy Award-winning Creative Director, Ryan Bomberger. The 2 minute long video, complete with a jingle that's infectious, adds a creative punch and dares to call out the President's failures on a wide range of issues.
"I'm as black as Obama, and I'm tired of any legitimate criticism of the President's policies reduced to lazy and ludicrous charges of racism. Obama and the Democrats have been promising a whole lot of hope and change but, instead, have delivered higher unemployment, higher poverty rates and millions more welfare enrollees while aggressively promoting abortion in the black community," Bomberger explains.
"Unemployment among Blacks was 12.7% when Obama took office. It spiked at 16.7% last August and remains at 14.4% today. Abortion, which has cultivated a culture of abandonment, occurs up to 6 times more in the black community than in the majority population. Yet, President Obama persistently promotes Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion chain, which claims that 'abortion and food stamps elevate the black community'."
"There is a profound lack of command of history that enables the black community to be so easily swayed by a political party that desperately depends on revising its own history," says Bomberger. "The Democrats -- the party of slavery, Jim Crow laws, anti-women's suffrage movement, the KKK, abortion, and generational welfare--is also the party that hopes to change our liberties through its abuse of the Constitution. This video just says out loud what many others are feeling."
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
You should also consider countermeasures that Obama deploys:
| 1 | They lose jobs because of this socialist ideals | They don't need those jobs because free money from the government compensates, and they don't even need to work to get it |
| 2 | Abortion kills their children | But the surviving children learn how to have sex before they learn to read or write. |
| 3 | The Attorney General pushes Illegal Mexican labor ahead of blacks | Labor of illegals is the new slave labor that pays for entitlements and feeds the new collective owner of the plantation. |
| 4 | The same Attorney General does nothing to stop black on black violence that kills more of their children | Doing anything else would be promoting cracker values; can't have that. Besides, violence keeps the whitey scared and obedient - which is pretty impressive for 10% of the population to achieve over the 90%. |
Let me see if I got this straight: you are satisfied to leave Obama in charge in order to not vote for Romney, with the criminal thugocracy Obama has installed, but he will be kept from ending the Republic if we vote conservatives into Congress to prevent him, but if Romney is elected, these same down ticket conservatives will not be conservatives with Romney the disgusting liberal in the White House. Is that about what you’re trying to get us to agree with?
Agreed, Finny, well put - and I would also add that with greater alt media status and strong majorities in the house and senate, Obama can be neutered and quite possibly impeached and removed within 2 short years. The one stickler that I worry about would be any Obama supreme court picks from 2013-2015 but those picks might be shredded and denied a seat by strong conservatives in the senate JC. However, our side can now safely say (after the unmasking of John Roberts) that the supreme court really is a political activist group of "unelected people" - we can agree with the Marxists on that point.
The answer is most definately NOT a vote for Romney.
Love it, thanks for posting!
Shared it w/ my FB friends.
You could still vote for conservatives for the House and Senate to just make sure to it that they keep Romney’s feet to the fire.
Well, if the drop is from 95% to 93%, that will be a half-million less Black votes for Obama considering the number he got in 2008. Now, a half million vote loss could help swing an election.
Well, if the drop is from 95% to 93%, that will be a half-million less Black votes for Obama considering the number he got in 2008. Now, a half million vote loss could help swing an election.
You’ve got two men who represent opposing parties, but whose actual deeds in office, and their respective end results, are quite similar. Some (including me) consider that there’s no appreciable difference between their records.
Now, the agenda these two men have forwarded through their deeds in office, favors left-wing ideals - and not the established, traditional ideals upon which the country was founded.
Both of their single terms in office resulted in great harm to the established order of things. The agenda they doggedly pursued was a radical departure from the way things had ordinarily been done by their people, and cut across the grain of the oldest traditions and practices which their people had long been accustomed to.
Again...the results were disastrous on both counts.
Now, having described these two men, let’s imagine that one of them currently holds the nation’s highest executive office. For the most part, his fellow party members in the legislature back his agenda with lock-step herd loyalty. Opposition party members in the legislature, for the most part, do not.
Complicating this executive’s execution of his agenda, is the fact that his party controls only one house of the legislature. His solution to this road block is to use the power and privilege of his office to bypass the legislature altogether, when possible, and simply issue executive edicts to accomplish his political goals. He also makes extensive use of the government’s bureaucratic agencies to issue and enforce political edicts which carry the weight of law.
Currently, this executive has achieved much of what he set out to do when he assumed office, and his radical agenda is causing disaster and dislocation throughout the culture and established order of the nation. However, he is term limited by the nation’s Constitution, and is up for re-election. Because of the obvious damage his agenda has inflicted upon the nation, his re-election is by no means guaranteed. In fact, his loss to an opposition challenger is a virtual certainty, provided the opposition party runs a competent, well-liked, well-known person, with a solid record of producing good effects as a chief executive.
The opposition party could not be more perfectly set up to cake walk their way back into power in the executive suite, but what do they do? They choose to run the aforementioned executive, whose record in office bears an unusually striking similarity to the current occupant’s.
This presents a dilemma for those in the opposition party who care less about labels, and more about traditional ideals and end results. By his record, it’s a near certainty that, should he win the election, their chosen candidate will most likely forward the agenda of the other side - representing his party (and their interests) in name and rhetoric only.
Faced with the political and institutional reality that one of these men will win the election, the opposition party, who are quite likely to win control of both houses of the legislature, are faced with having to work with a chief executive who, despite all his rhetoric to the contrary, will most likely continue forwarding the same agenda that has recently done so much damage to the nation.
Many of these legislators will feel compelled to push for a resumption of best practices, as understood by those who elected them to office. Many of them will feel empowered and duty bound to put an end to the radical departures of the previous administration.
And here is where it gets complicated for some people.
Politics is a bit like making sausage. You don’t want to watch how it’s done behind the scene, lest you lose your appetite for the resultant product. A lot of deal-making, strong arm tactics, threats, and compromising, goes into the mix. Despite having a new majority, the opposition party in the legislature will tend toward factionalism and a lock-step herd mentality, mostly predicated on nothing more than the base group dynamic of ‘us versus them’. Thus has it ever been in politics.
This will result in the individual members voting with their ‘team’, and in the case of the opposition party, supporting their team captain’s agenda, should he become the new chief executive.
If the current chief executive somehow holds on to the office, you can expect much less cooperation with his agenda from the opposition-dominated legislature.
Anyone who’s closely watching the legislature now, sees this dynamic at work with the current chief executive. Many of his team members in the legislature have supported his disastrous agenda to their personal detriment. Many have been voted out of office during the current term, and many more will be punished for defying the will of the people.
Whatever happened to self-preservation? Does party loyalty really trump political survival for these legislators? Apparently, for many, it does. Understand, too, that many (if not most) of the newly dominant opposition party legislators will behave exactly as their counterparts across the aisle have, once their guy is chief.
Seems to be a lot of trying to have it both ways: if allowing little barry bastard commie to have four more years, we must vote into office down ticket an army of conservatives who’will’ restrain and perhaps have the guts to impeach the unconstitutional sonofabitch; while on the hand, we are to vote these same ‘conservatives’ in and if Romney gets elected they will become ‘not so principled’ any more. Hail the force, the magic thinking is thick on this one ...
It is stunning How Ignorant Blacks were to vote for this Commie Rat...
He is Killing Jobs with every move He makes and the Blacks are going to be the First to suffer from it!!
They are attacked By the Illegals undercutting jobs from them, and Obama is opening the flood Gates for Illegals!!!
The Left has destroyed Manufacturing..and within Urban areas the Blacks will suffer most from this!!!
Their Education is usualy Public...which is a Democrat Joke...
The Democrats and Obama have squandered billions on “Green Jobs” which created about (ZERO) Jobs for Blacks...
Hey! Black America! Come on over!! Lets Get America Working again for everyone!!! stop Believing this Commie Rat’s Lies!!!!!
LOL..."magic thinking"? Not even close. It's simply human nature, and the way the world has always worked.
I'll tell you what "magic thinking" is:
The belief that a man with a liberal record like Romney's, is going to govern any differently if he's elected president.
That a more conservative Congress is going to 'hold Romney's feet to the fire' in any significant way.
That a guy like Willard is going to undo any part of Obama's hard work in 'fundamentally transforming America.'
That conservatives will eventually be happy and proud that they gave Romney a chance to turn things around.
That you can call yourself a conservative, while voting for the most abjectly liberal candidate the GOP has ever foisted upon us.
That's "magic thinking".
You can attribute any 'you'isms to me you choose, but that doesn't change the nature of your magic thinking which is clearly being displayed with these flip and flop portentions of these supposed conservative legislators so easily shifted by which of the two enemy liberals gets into the presidency.
I happen to prefer the chances of bending Romney over the possibility of bending little barry bastard commie. We The People are in a world of danger. Neither of these tweo liberals will be workign to change the direction of the NWO agenda, but I believe we have a better chance to forestall the collapse under Romney. That's my opinion and last I saw at FR I have a right to express my opinion.
Barry Dunham doesn't like America, he has a mean streak against white people, he has zero respect for OUR Constitution, and is workign his fairy fanny off to radically transform America. I believe Romney loves America, respects the Constitution more than little barry bastard commie, and doesn't want a sudden collapse of our nation. I suspect Milt doesn't hate white people, either, but then I also suspect little barry bastard commie DOES hate whites and Latinos based upon his actions so far. You millage (its a tax term) may vary, but then it's yours not mine.
I'm trying to think of how to explain this so it's as real and solid as a concrete block. It's honestly not complex, and it's not "magic thinking".
Let's imagine that a Republican-dominated (not necessarily conservative-dominated) Congress is faced with a president who's trying to push something similar to 'comprehensive immigration reform' through the legislature.
Some legislators are gonna be fer it, and some are gonna be agin it (for various reasons).
We know which way the treason party's going to come down on such a proposal, but by and large, most Republicans would probably be agin it for reasons of principle, or because they know the voters back home would skin them alive for supporting it.
If the president is a Democrat, then the natural tendency of the Republicans to oppose him along party lines, is a no-brainer. There's no danger in crossing their arms and saying, "no".
On the other hand, what if the president pushing for this is a Republican? Do you really think the Republicans' opposition is going to be nearly as strident or unified? I think you know that it won't be. We already saw this at work during the first six years of the GWB presidency. He gave the libs nearly everything they wanted, and the Republican-dominated Congress almost never stood in his way.
The only way to hold such bad behavior at bay, is if a few hundred thousand angry citizens are right outside the Capitol Building, waving nooses and pitchforks. But how often are such protests going to be organized? Every time the Republicans in Congress might be suspected of possibly caving in to the liberal Republican in the White House?
Pardon me, if I'm just a bit skeptical about our ability to stand watch over Congress to that degree.
So, that's my point, and it's about as clear as I can make it. These are the political dynamics that play out in every administration - Democrat or Republican.
“Rudy did wonders in NY and his hands were tied nearly the entire time.”
Rudy acted as though race didn’t exist (he treated blacks as whites, with similar expectations, not the condescending paternal attitudes most libs have with them), and didn’t legitimize the likes of Sharpton. Fox News resurrected that POS; he had practically disappeared under Giuliani.
So these ‘staunch conservatives’ manifest when a commie democrat progressive is in the White Hut, but these same people are transmogrified into complacent or even go-along-to-get-along republican dweebs when a liberal republican is in the White House. Got it. ... No magic thinking there, no siree.
Now you're putting words in my mouth. I never said anything about "staunch conservatives". I said, "Republicans". It'll be some time before conservatives dominate Congress. That's a long-term work in progress.
One thing I didn't add, is that a Republican-dominated Congress is going to be likely to support the agenda and wishes of any Republican president - liberal, conservative, or moderate.
That’s a keeper.
Profoundly well said.
The left will just dismiss Ryan Bomberger as an Uncle Tom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.