MALKIN UNLOADS on Liberal Over Fast and Furious: ‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE’s HANDS!’

TheBlaze.com ^ | June 21, 2012 | Jonathon M. Seidl

[Yosemitest]

MALKIN UNLOADS ON LIBERAL ‘HANNITY’ GUEST OVER FAST AND FURIOUS:
‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE'S HANDS!’

June 21, 2012 by Jonathon M. Seidl


Last week, Michelle Malkin stoked the conservative fire after she challenged Juan Williams for calling her “just” a blogger.
But if that was stoking the fire, what she did Wednesday night on “Hannity” to liberal Tamara Holder was torching the place with napalm.

Malkin was a guest along with Holder on a segment talking about the day’s Fast and Furious news
(Obama granting executive privilege and Holder being held in contempt).
About three minutes in, Holder tried to use the liberal talking point
that the entire operation was really started under the Bush administration
(the “blame Bush” mantra is really popular these days).
That’s where things first got tense, after Holder scolded Hannity who tried to make a point and told him,
“No no, let me finish.
Give me the same amount of time you give all your Republican friends.”



But after Holder continued to try and use the argument, Malkin eventually had enough.

“Can I just go back to this, the tiresome blame Bush card,
because I don‘t think that Tamara knows what she’s talking about
when we talk about the difference between Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver and Project Gunrunner,” Malkin said.

“Excuse me!” Malkin shouted back when Holder tried to interrupt.
“This is not a partisan thing!”

Holder, clearly offended, took a shot at Malkin:
“Sure, sure, I don’t know what I am talking about.
No no, to be attacked and say that I don‘t know what I am talking about
just because I’m not a New York Times best-selling author–.”


Hannity stepped in and let Malkin finish, who delivered another blow:
“For some of us the core issues of national security, Second Amendment rights, integrity in government actually matters,
it is not just some sort of TV game debate for us, Tamara.”

Holder did not appreciate that,
and there were plenty more raised voices before Malkin pointed out
that Wide Receiver was “planned, controlled delivery and retrieval“
and that ”they got those guns back,”
but that didn’t happen in the Obama administration
because there was “underlying gun control agenda that is clear in these documents.”

“Clearly they are the ones with the ideological zealotry that caused bloodshed in this country.
The blood is on your people’s hands, Tamara!” she said passionately.

“No, actually we‘re all Americans and it’s on all of our hands,” Holder responded,
before saying these things just “take time” to figure out and that the contempt charge is too soon.

Malkin interrupted, and when Holder objected Malkin shot back,
“No, I’m not going to let you get away with that lie!”

Watch the segment below.
The setup starts at about 3:30, but the fireworks show begins about two minutes later:

[muawiyah]

Do you mean, perhaps, "he background"?

Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun' in prison during WWII?

[muawiyah]

Do you mean, perhaps, "he background"?

Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun' in prison during WWII?

[RummyChick]

During the Juan Williams take down - I saw a poster somewhere say that Michelle went all “cut-eye” on him.

She did the same thing with this woman.

[Logical me]

Hannity is trying to keep the conversation on track and not going back to the liberal talking points. We heard this shi! a million times from liberals.

[skeeter]

The GOP would be in far better shape if King Solomon were their ‘Architect’ rather than Karl Rove.

[muawiyah]

Didn't I say they had "visas"? That's how you know they were here legally. But were they citizens?

The answer is NO!

Was she born before they had immigration visas? The same answer.

I'm all for the technicalities.

[Yosemitest]

Let us ALL remember,

Over a barrel? Meet White House gun policy adviser Steve Croley
By Jason Horowitz,


(excerpt) ... On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack,
and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial “large magazines.”
Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney.
During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, “to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda,” she said.

“I just want you to know that we are working on it,” Brady recalled the president telling them.
“We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

In the meeting, she said, Obama discussed how records get into the system and what can be done about firearms retailers.
Her husband specifically brought up the proposed ban on large magazine clips,
and she noted that even former vice president Dick Cheney had suggested that some restrictions on the clips might make sense.

“He just laughed,” Sarah Brady said approvingly of the president.
Both she and her husband, she emphasized, had absolute confidence that the president was committed to regulation.

In simpler, pre-administration times, so was the president’s point man.
In Croley’s book, he argued that for all the healthy skepticism, in a complex world, regulation still amounted to “the least-worst solution to pressing social problems.”

[chopperman]

"I cannot spare this woman... she fights."

Isn't this borrowed from what Lincoln said about Grant?

[Logical me]

Under Socialism/Communism the individual owns nothing, not even their self.

And, Sir, that if just where we are heading. What do we own now that is not under the control of Government. You are right on and needs to be said over and over. We are no longer free, but wards of the State. You can bet on that.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun’ in prison during WWII?

---

Based on clear evidence uncovered after the war which proved many “Japanese-Americans” living on the west coast were saboteurs, she said the internment camps were prudent and right.

Now I bet you're gonna wax poetically and emotionally about them poor “chillun’” languishing in chains.

[MrB]

This is why, immediately after a communist takeover, they teach evolution and get rid of all religion. When your existance is merely an accident of time and chance, and you’re not valuable accountable to a higher being, the state becomes of primary universal importance.

[Carriage Hill]

I turned-off that liberal-RINO blowhard Hannity years ago; he’s dogcrap and 10x worse than nails on a blackboard.

[SgtHooper]

That’s the typical ploy by an ignoramous liberal rat to combine both sides as one in the argument when it clearly falls heavily on their side. Truly scumbags, they are!

[Graewoulf]

” - - - Unfortunately, I’m sure Mitt and his GOP insiders won’t either.”

McCain chose Palin, (his best Campaign decision), and the Tampa Convention should draft Malkin to be Romney’s Veep.

Romney has more faults than I have time to list. However, near the top of the list is Romney’s absolute total lack of “FIRE IN THE BELLY!”

Malkin has more than enough for both of them.

BTW, the “GOP insiders” are on a track, in 2012, to repeat the same mistakes McCain made in his loss to Obama in 2008.

[CatherineofAragon]

Thanks for reminding me about the Juan Williams thing. I didn’t see it when it happened; going to dig up the video.

And yes, she did have a cut-eye going on last night....at the end, she even did a soul-sister “snap” gesture, LOL.

[muawiyah]

First off you'll need to come up with the evidence ~ since no one else has. But secondly I didn't say anything about Japanese, just children.

Michelle was happy to imprison infants even.

She's all about the technicalities that serve to punish the innocent ~ which is why I don't cut her any slack on any of this stuff.

[clbiel]

+1

[ontap]

Tamara Holder is such a shill for liberals she has become nothing more than a joke!!!

[anoldafvet]

The one that made me puke was when she tried to suck up to the military/

[Yosemitest]

Why is Tamara Holder's last name the same as Eric Holder?