MALKIN UNLOADS on Liberal Over Fast and Furious: ‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE’s HANDS!’

TheBlaze.com ^ | June 21, 2012 | Jonathon M. Seidl

[Yosemitest]

MALKIN UNLOADS ON LIBERAL ‘HANNITY’ GUEST OVER FAST AND FURIOUS:
‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE'S HANDS!’

June 21, 2012 by Jonathon M. Seidl


Last week, Michelle Malkin stoked the conservative fire after she challenged Juan Williams for calling her “just” a blogger.
But if that was stoking the fire, what she did Wednesday night on “Hannity” to liberal Tamara Holder was torching the place with napalm.

Malkin was a guest along with Holder on a segment talking about the day’s Fast and Furious news
(Obama granting executive privilege and Holder being held in contempt).
About three minutes in, Holder tried to use the liberal talking point
that the entire operation was really started under the Bush administration
(the “blame Bush” mantra is really popular these days).
That’s where things first got tense, after Holder scolded Hannity who tried to make a point and told him,
“No no, let me finish.
Give me the same amount of time you give all your Republican friends.”



But after Holder continued to try and use the argument, Malkin eventually had enough.

“Can I just go back to this, the tiresome blame Bush card,
because I don‘t think that Tamara knows what she’s talking about
when we talk about the difference between Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver and Project Gunrunner,” Malkin said.

“Excuse me!” Malkin shouted back when Holder tried to interrupt.
“This is not a partisan thing!”

Holder, clearly offended, took a shot at Malkin:
“Sure, sure, I don’t know what I am talking about.
No no, to be attacked and say that I don‘t know what I am talking about
just because I’m not a New York Times best-selling author–.”


Hannity stepped in and let Malkin finish, who delivered another blow:
“For some of us the core issues of national security, Second Amendment rights, integrity in government actually matters,
it is not just some sort of TV game debate for us, Tamara.”

Holder did not appreciate that,
and there were plenty more raised voices before Malkin pointed out
that Wide Receiver was “planned, controlled delivery and retrieval“
and that ”they got those guns back,”
but that didn’t happen in the Obama administration
because there was “underlying gun control agenda that is clear in these documents.”

“Clearly they are the ones with the ideological zealotry that caused bloodshed in this country.
The blood is on your people’s hands, Tamara!” she said passionately.

“No, actually we‘re all Americans and it’s on all of our hands,” Holder responded,
before saying these things just “take time” to figure out and that the contempt charge is too soon.

Malkin interrupted, and when Holder objected Malkin shot back,
“No, I’m not going to let you get away with that lie!”

Watch the segment below.
The setup starts at about 3:30, but the fireworks show begins about two minutes later:

[muawiyah]

The Democrats want us ALL to be guilty of their stuff. That's why they want us to pay for their abortions, pay to put down grandma, .......

Frankly, if a Democrat's sins are malodious enough to justify blaming me for them, they're bad enough to jump off a high building!

[tom paine 2]

Yes I saw it and changed channels for the rest of the program. I’m sure I wasn’t tyhe only one that did this, so the cable ratings will show that people were turning this drivel off in droves.

[cartan]

Self-ping for later.

[Graewoulf]

Malkin would make a GREAT Veep for Romney!

[muawiyah]

Malkin is arguably an "anchor baby". She's not the sort you really want to drag out to talk about enforcing immigration laws vigorously.

Doesn't mean she can't, but it's a problem.

I'd have no difficulty arguing that the anchor babies didn't qualify since their mommies and daddies could take them back to wherever ~ not like a real American chil' where you'd have to prove something to get him added to your own national passport.

Michelle's baby daddy and mommy had passports and visas, so she'd be on the first boatload to Manilla!

[tom paine 2]

Just went to the feedback section on the Jeopardy website and complained.

[skeeter]

Dealing with liberals in a debate is like dealing with children - what frustrates me in is usually our side continues to treat them with respect when they're long past deserving respect.

Its why this one was so nice to watch.

[Mountain Mary]

Hannity, B’OR, they just can’t help themselves.

It is so annoying the way they constantly interrupt with their boring, stupid comments. Michelle M. usually gets the short end of the stick when she is sandwiched between Juan and “Don’t let your heart be troubled” man.

She’s sufficiently PO’ed now though and has asserted herself much more lately. Love, love, love her. She’s speaking at our Freedom Conference in Co. this August. YAY!

[trisham]

Malkin is arguably an "anchor baby". She's not the sort you really want to drag out to talk about enforcing immigration laws vigorously.

*****************************

Her parents were here legally. From Wikipedia:

Malkin was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Philippine citizens Rafaela (née Perez) – a homemaker and teacher – and Apolo DeCastro Maglalang, who was then a physician-in-training.[1] Several months prior to Malkin's birth, her parents had immigrated to the United States on an employer-sponsored visa.[4] After her father finished his medical training, the family moved[5] to Absecon, New Jersey. Malkin has a younger brother.[6] She has described her parents as Reagan Republicans who were "not incredibly politically active."[1]

[Cringing Negativism Network]

I NEVER knew that.

Always assumed Michelle Malkin was ineligible.

Wow. Had never before now, even considered that possibility.

Thanks. A lot!

[Xyz22]

I have the same problem with O’Reilly. Just when one of his guests gets rolling he leaps in with his opinion, which is usually a non- opinion. His “ we’re not going to try this case here” routine gets very old. I say bravo, Michelle. Holder never knew what hit her.

[CaribCarter]

She sure would. I hadn’t even thought of that. Unfortunately, I’m sure Mitt and his GOP insiders won’t either.

[MrB]

Proverbs 26:4-5 gives us the blueprint for dealing with fools.

Don’t argue with them in their folly, ie, don’t accept their premises and argue based on those premises, or you’ll be just as foolish as they,

but answer to their premises, showing them the folly of those premises, or else the fool will remain wise in his own eyes.

[CatherineofAragon]

I agree. Michelle is consistently great. There’s no backing down with her, no equivocating, and I very much doubt she will EVER pull an Ann Coulter.

[rxtn41]

You need to read he bio on WIKI before you spout off one what you believe is in her background....

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

Remember when that crazy old bat from “Code Pink” tried to smear red paint, a representation of blood” on Condi Rice? I think we’ve got a precedent...

[ducttape45]

Ping for later, but I love Michelle Malkin! Can’t wait to see this!

[CatherineofAragon]

"Michelle M. usually gets the short end of the stick when she is sandwiched between Juan and “Don’t let your heart be troubled” man."

Don't get me started on Hannity and his worn-out catchphrases, and his stupid football. Last night he did little more than stutter and interrupt; he should have just shut it and let Michelle take over.

[Logical me]

Michelle Malkin, you are the best. Finally someone with real guts and unload the truth. Please, do not let up. And a special thanks to Hannity for booking Michelle and that impossible dumb liberal. Putting them on at the same time was a stroke of genius. Hannity is the only 1 hour slot on the entire TV that has the guts. The big O’Reilly is a joke. Cavito is too soft.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

In the process, he KNOWINGLY was going to cause many, many Mexicans to die for his agenda, and it didn’t matter to this Marxist, because the agenda is more important than any amount of human life or suffering.

---

Under Socialism/Communism the individual owns nothing, not even their self.