Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:35 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: presidio9

Good for the queen.


2 posted on 06/03/2012 2:44:36 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of queens.


3 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:12 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I’d bet she prefers the term “homonauseous”.


4 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:35 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Bitch, bitch, bitch.


5 posted on 06/03/2012 2:46:24 PM PDT by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Is she also beastiphobic because she has never once mentioned the community of people that have sex with animals?


6 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:08 PM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some."

Child molesters, pornographers, and wife beaters -- the Queen has also scandalously failed to reach out and support these people as well.

7 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:48 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Obama needs more time. After all -- Rome wasn't burned in a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I’d say she’s not a panderer.

She needs no campaign contributions and doesn’t need to win any elections.

To her she’s the only Queen that counts.


8 posted on 06/03/2012 2:49:46 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Who cares, Mr Tatchell??? Does she routinely single out groups to glorify? Or is the LGBT group so insecure and needy that they need props CONSTANTLY? Never mind. I just answered my own question.
9 posted on 06/03/2012 2:50:05 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Yes. She’s afraid of her son.


11 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:39 PM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

This fairy is bitchier than Mark Morford.


12 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:48 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

What do you call a gay milkman?

(Down)

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

A dairy queen


13 posted on 06/03/2012 2:53:05 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
So what Mr Tatchell. So what.

Is the LGBT community heterphobic? For all the ‘hate mongering’ they do one would think so.

I don't like LGBT either, that doesn't make me homophobic.

A phobia is defined as: an exaggerated inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.

I am tired of the LGBT community calling people homophobic, when we simply state it is not a lifestyle we choose or condone. It is like me saying I won't serve spinach because I don't like spinach and won't serve my guests that which I don't like.

LGBT community needs to get over itself and no...I don't have to accept their lifestyle. Just as I don't accept a drug addict lifestyle, a drunken lifestyle, or serving spinach just because my cousin Sally thinks I should.

14 posted on 06/03/2012 2:55:19 PM PDT by EBH (Obama took away your American Dreams and replaced them with "Dreams from My (his) Father".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Her Majesty,
by John Lennon and Paul McCartney

Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she doesn't have a lot to say.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she changes from day to day.

I wanna tell her that I love her a lot,
but I gotta get a belly full of wine.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl,
someday I'm gonna make her mine.
Oh yeah, someday I'm gonna make her mine.

16 posted on 06/03/2012 2:57:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Homosexuals and their advocates have effectively turned their sexual perversity into a righteous cause that is totally beyond criticism and today demands an attitude of obsequiousness from public figures, especially politicians. Apparently, the homosexual crusaders don't intend to allow the 86-year-old Queen of England to escape her turn at fawning over homosexual behavior by pretending to care deeply about the welfare and happiness of those who chose to engage in homosexual acts.

The tried-and-true leftist ploy of lumping everyone who engages in homosexual acts as part of a group ('LGBT') and then denouncing the queen (or anyone) for not giving enough attention (and assumed respect) to anyone in that group as 'insensitive' and, all together now: 'homophobic' may well succeed with Queen Elizabeth. If not, it would be one of the few times I ever cheered for the British monarchy.

18 posted on 06/03/2012 3:02:21 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"While she has spoken approvingly of the UK's many races and faiths, for six decades the Queen has ignored lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Britons. If she treated black and Asian Britons in the same way, she'd be denounced as a racist. Why the double standards?

Maybe, just maybe, it might be because an LGBT or Q is not a race?

Is the author of this piece some kind of idiot? (rhetorical question only - the question answers itself).

19 posted on 06/03/2012 3:07:54 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of cry babies! The queen is not obligated to their cause. Maybe they should stick with the folks and Penny’s and Target. The queen has her hands full with her creepy family.


20 posted on 06/03/2012 3:09:31 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Still pretending that their butts are a race, I see.


21 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

There’s no “double standard.”


23 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

If she is homophobic, that’s great.

Anyne who isn’t is contributing to the Sodomisation of the planet.


24 posted on 06/03/2012 3:17:49 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"Not once in her 60-year reign has the Queen publicly acknowledged the existence of the gay [sic] community..."

I could swear I remember her saying something once about an "anus horribilis".

25 posted on 06/03/2012 3:19:55 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson