Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Queen homophobic?
Scoop World ^ | Saturday, 2 June 2012 | Peter Tatchell

Posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:31 PM PDT by presidio9

"Not once in her 60-year reign has the Queen publicly acknowledged the existence of the gay community - or gay members of her own royal family. She has never supported or visited a gay charity. Although she is a patron of many good causes, none of them are gay or serve the gay community. The words 'gay' and 'lesbian' have never publicly passed her lips," said human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, Director of the human rights advocacy organisation, the Peter Tatchell Foundation.

He was speaking in the run-up to this weekend's Diamond Jubilee celebrations in Britain, which commemorate Elizabeth II's 60 years on the throne.

"Even when she announced government plans for gay law reform in her Queen's Speeches to parliament, she did not use the words lesbian or gay. Apparently, mentioning gay people is beneath the dignity of the monarch," he added.

"While she has spoken approvingly of the UK's many races and faiths, for six decades the Queen has ignored lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Britons. If she treated black and Asian Britons in the same way, she'd be denounced as a racist. Why the double standards?

"Whereas most of us now welcome and embrace gay people, the Queen has never done so.

"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some. How much longer will the LGBT community have to wait for royal recognition and acceptance?

"There is solid evidence of regal prejudice. Gay staff in the Royal Household used to be banned from bringing their partners to the annual Christmas Ball at Buckingham Palace; whereas heterosexual staff were always invited to attend with their partners. This homophobic discrimination was exposed by the LGBT human rights group OutRage! in 1995. It was only after a protest outside the palace and the ensuing bad publicity that the royals dropped the ban.

"When there are major tragedies involving the loss of life, the Queen often visits the site and the victims in hospital. This did not happen when neo-Nazi, David Copeland, bombed the Admiral Duncan gay pub in Soho, London, in 1999, killing three people and wounding 70 others. At the time, it was the worst terrorist outrage in mainland Britain for many years. To most people's surprise, the Queen did not visit the bombed-out pub or the hospitalised victims.

"Defenders of the monarchy point out that many royal staff are gay men. This is true. So what? Having gay staff wait hand and foot on the Queen is proof of nothing, apart from the fact that she likes well-mannered, well-groomed male servants. It's the equivalent of rich racists claiming that they can't be racist because they employ black staff to clean their homes and cook their meals.

"Ever since the public relations blunders at the time of Princess Diana's death, the Queen has gone to great lengths to be more in touch with the mood of country. She presents the monarchy as modern, compassionate and inclusive; often referring to the value of a diverse multicultural, multifaith society.

"On gay issues, however, she remains curiously out of step with public opinion. While I doubt that Elizabeth II is a hard-core homophobe, she certainly doesn't appear to be gay-sympathetic," said Mr Tatchell.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; lgbt; queenhatesqueens; swrdswllwngsdshw; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:35 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Good for the queen.


2 posted on 06/03/2012 2:44:36 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of queens.


3 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:12 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’d bet she prefers the term “homonauseous”.


4 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:35 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Bitch, bitch, bitch.


5 posted on 06/03/2012 2:46:24 PM PDT by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is she also beastiphobic because she has never once mentioned the community of people that have sex with animals?


6 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:08 PM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some."

Child molesters, pornographers, and wife beaters -- the Queen has also scandalously failed to reach out and support these people as well.

7 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:48 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Obama needs more time. After all -- Rome wasn't burned in a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’d say she’s not a panderer.

She needs no campaign contributions and doesn’t need to win any elections.

To her she’s the only Queen that counts.


8 posted on 06/03/2012 2:49:46 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Who cares, Mr Tatchell??? Does she routinely single out groups to glorify? Or is the LGBT group so insecure and needy that they need props CONSTANTLY? Never mind. I just answered my own question.
9 posted on 06/03/2012 2:50:05 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
No kidding. 'The love that dare not speak' has turned into 'the queers that just won't shut the hell up'

/johnny

10 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yes. She’s afraid of her son.


11 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:39 PM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This fairy is bitchier than Mark Morford.


12 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:48 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What do you call a gay milkman?

(Down)

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

A dairy queen


13 posted on 06/03/2012 2:53:05 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
So what Mr Tatchell. So what.

Is the LGBT community heterphobic? For all the ‘hate mongering’ they do one would think so.

I don't like LGBT either, that doesn't make me homophobic.

A phobia is defined as: an exaggerated inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.

I am tired of the LGBT community calling people homophobic, when we simply state it is not a lifestyle we choose or condone. It is like me saying I won't serve spinach because I don't like spinach and won't serve my guests that which I don't like.

LGBT community needs to get over itself and no...I don't have to accept their lifestyle. Just as I don't accept a drug addict lifestyle, a drunken lifestyle, or serving spinach just because my cousin Sally thinks I should.

14 posted on 06/03/2012 2:55:19 PM PDT by EBH (Obama took away your American Dreams and replaced them with "Dreams from My (his) Father".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

Did you hear about the Scottish drag queen?

He wore pants.


15 posted on 06/03/2012 2:56:43 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Her Majesty,
by John Lennon and Paul McCartney

Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she doesn't have a lot to say.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she changes from day to day.

I wanna tell her that I love her a lot,
but I gotta get a belly full of wine.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl,
someday I'm gonna make her mine.
Oh yeah, someday I'm gonna make her mine.

16 posted on 06/03/2012 2:57:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Bingo!


17 posted on 06/03/2012 2:57:41 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Homosexuals and their advocates have effectively turned their sexual perversity into a righteous cause that is totally beyond criticism and today demands an attitude of obsequiousness from public figures, especially politicians. Apparently, the homosexual crusaders don't intend to allow the 86-year-old Queen of England to escape her turn at fawning over homosexual behavior by pretending to care deeply about the welfare and happiness of those who chose to engage in homosexual acts.

The tried-and-true leftist ploy of lumping everyone who engages in homosexual acts as part of a group ('LGBT') and then denouncing the queen (or anyone) for not giving enough attention (and assumed respect) to anyone in that group as 'insensitive' and, all together now: 'homophobic' may well succeed with Queen Elizabeth. If not, it would be one of the few times I ever cheered for the British monarchy.

18 posted on 06/03/2012 3:02:21 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"While she has spoken approvingly of the UK's many races and faiths, for six decades the Queen has ignored lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Britons. If she treated black and Asian Britons in the same way, she'd be denounced as a racist. Why the double standards?

Maybe, just maybe, it might be because an LGBT or Q is not a race?

Is the author of this piece some kind of idiot? (rhetorical question only - the question answers itself).

19 posted on 06/03/2012 3:07:54 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of cry babies! The queen is not obligated to their cause. Maybe they should stick with the folks and Penny’s and Target. The queen has her hands full with her creepy family.


20 posted on 06/03/2012 3:09:31 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson