Don't make me pay contraception, DON'T EVEN MAKE ME PAY FOR CONTRACEPTION!!
Posted on 03/05/2012 8:21:37 AM PST by Skeez
Fluke has been called a slut. Not only for sleeping herself through law school, but for pimping herself off as some kind of “reproductive rights” expert. But today I received an email from someone who claims to be from Georgetown stating that Sandra Fluke really isn’t who she says she is. That is heterosexual, and that she is in fact gay.
I have no idea if the email is real or fake. I don’t care if she’s gay or not. Having family members who are gay I’m not homophobic. The email headers check out and it appears legit. The writer states she knows this because, “We have been intimate, I know she hasn’t been with a man since I’ve known her”.
She further states that Fluke was “recruited” to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is “Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need?” Is that not indeed lying to congress?
So then maybe she’s not a slut after all, but simply a liar and a fake?
Again, have no idea if this is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it were. Wouldn’t be the first time liberals manufactured a character.
UPDATE: In 2010 The Woman Lawyers Association of Los Angeles cited Fuke as a 2010 Public Interest Grant Recipient.
Fluke has been called a slut. Not only for sleeping herself through law school, but for pimping herself off as some kind of “reproductive rights” expert. But today I received an email from someone who claims to be from Georgetown stating that Sandra Fluke really isn’t who she says she is. That is heterosexual, and that she is in fact gay.
I have no idea if the email is real or fake. I don’t care if she’s gay or not. Having family members who are gay I’m not homophobic. The email headers check out and it appears legit. The writer states she knows this because, “We have been intimate, I know she hasn’t been with a man since I’ve known her”.
She further states that Fluke was “recruited” to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is “Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need?” Is that not indeed lying to congress?
So then maybe she’s not a slut after all, but simply a liar and a fake?
Again, have no idea if this is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it were. Wouldn’t be the first time liberals manufactured a character.
UPDATE: In 2010 The Woman Lawyers Association of Los Angeles cited Fuke as a 2010 Public Interest Grant Recipient.
Seems Fluke is at the very least a celebrated activist with close ties to feminist causes as well with the LGBTQ, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender and queer and questioning groups.
UPDATE: More on Fluke at Pat Dollard’s blog. Turns out she’s a 30 year old activist.
Stay on topic, man.
My head is still spinning with all this back and forth about what Rush said and all that.
However, when Sandra made her statements, did she ever say that she personally was paying $3000 for the birth control? Didn’t she say that it costs “students” or some others that much? My point is, I don’t think she was meaning to talk about her own sex life. I don’t think she ever actually said that this cost and lack of coverage in the health plan was a personal burden to her. I think she was saying that this is a burden to unnamed girls who need birth control in college.
Something to think about. She was a spokesman for a point of view, but not necessarily a personal spokesman.
Rush better not touch this one with a 10 foot pole
so to speak
Called it the first time I saw her. She's more butch than Kos. Her electric pickle looks like Nancy Pelosi. When she gets hitched to her partner, she'll be registered at Fists R' Us.
“‘I am astonished at the desperation of the elite media to avoid rising gas prices, to avoid a presidential apology to religious fanatics in Afghanistan, to avoid a trillion dollar deficit … and suddenly decide that Rush Limbaugh is the real national crisis this week.” (Newt Gingrich)
I do believe that this would be classified as lying before Congress.
Well, she isn’t on the 2012 women’s softball roster:
http://www.guhoyas.com/sports/w-softbl/mtt/gu-w-softbl-mtt.html
And being gay isnt going to help Rush’s argument one bit...
She sure doesn’t look very gay to me, rather glum really. She could be a homosexual though.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2854646/posts?page=21#21
“‘I am astonished at the desperation of the elite media to avoid rising gas prices, to avoid a presidential apology to religious fanatics in Afghanistan, to avoid a trillion dollar deficit … and suddenly decide that Rush Limbaugh is the real national crisis this week.”
Add 13 Hostages in Egypt
You can google her transcript & see exactly what she testified. That being said, if you would permit me to make a suggestion, here’s a really good article to read that will stop a lot of the head spinning & put the whole kerfluffle in serious perspective (it’s also been posted as a FR thread):
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/05/the-real-point-of-the-left%e2%80%99s-uproar-over-limbaugh/
Lesbians can’t be sluts? It would certainly help because she has no need for it, being a vagitarian and all...
Gay people are more slutty than regular folks.
Then her testimony is just hearsay. Anyway the GOP lost the "slut" vote long ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.