To: Skeez
What possible difference would that make?
She is a FLAKE that's all that matters. Or is it a Fluck, or Flucke
10 posted on
03/05/2012 8:31:11 AM PST by
DeaconRed
(Thanks ZERO, Thanks a lot. I have a broken bank account that's all I got. My apologies to E. Tubb)
To: Voter#537
She further states that Fluke was recruited to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need? Is that not indeed lying to congress? This is another attempt to lead us down a blind alley.
She said that she is speaking for many women who are having trouble paying for birth control and then she gave several examples of women who allegedly told her about their difficult situations. Apparently lezzies also have problems, even though I don't know what that has to do with birth control.
She is combining all of this as a women's issues when some are clearly medical and some are clearly related to birth control.
This whole thing is a tar baby meant to distract from the first amendment freedom of religion clause.
24 posted on
03/05/2012 8:46:05 AM PST by
oldbrowser
(They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
To: Voter#537
Or is it a Fluck, or Flucke I heard Rush call it sounding like Fluck.
Breitbart could have a subsection to its web site called BIG FLUCK.
39 posted on
03/05/2012 9:19:50 AM PST by
dragonblustar
(Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson