Posted on 01/26/2012 4:35:06 AM PST by icwhatudo
Anne Coulter pal Matt Drudge has declared all out war on the Gingrich campaign. As of 7am Eastern time he has 9 negative mentions about Newt (none on Romney):
NEWT FLASHBACK 1983: REAGAN RESPONSIBLE FOR NATIONAL 'DECAY'...
NEWT 1986: 'The Reagan administration has failed, is failing... President Reagan is clearly failing'...
NEWT 1988: 'If Bush runs as continuation of Reaganism he will lose'... VIDEO...
INSIDER: GINGRICH REPEATEDLY INSULTED REAGAN
R. EMMETT TYRRELL: William Jefferson Gingrich...
COULTER: RE-ELECT OBAMA: VOTE NEWT!...
CNN: Gingrich admits his ABC claim was false during debate...
Gingrich tells UNIVISION: No perjury during my divorce depositions...
Marianne Gingrich lawyer: 'He was never deposed'...
Seems to be a couple things...Newt winning for one and bad weather for another. Can’t imagine why ;)
The only thing I can find that gave him ‘front runner’ cred was the media claiming it, not from anything he ever did. Multiple runs for office and a failed governorship do not a true frontrunner make.
Repeat the lie until it becomes truth - that’s why/how he got to be front runner IMO.
So the tagline is saying that we cannot sniff out a troll no more.
Correct if I ma mistaken but after all the comments left and then the tagline, well.
Maybe some of us have sniffed out a troll
You must be a pure joy to be around whenever someone doesn’t agree with you 100% on something. I’m sure the name calling and impugning of others wins them right over to thinking your way. I want Obama and his lunatic policies to end. I’ll be happy to have anyone on our side do that.
Could, but that is why we have grammer Nazi’s on FR.
Maybe, but i think there was more to it than that. To his credit he did work hard to get backing among key Republicans and had built a strong organization (in part thanks to having run before but also from raising a heck of a lot of money). He was and is obviously the establishment choice and that alone is usually enough to make someone a frontrunner. Couple that with his seemingly endless funds and he was always going to be tough to beat.
Maybe. His nomination, though, much less election, is anything but a done deal. Almost any warm body opposed to Romney will run strong. But I agree that pressure must exist, and that’s why I hope a VP selection like Allen West would be in the cards.
There’s been some questions on Drudge’s seeming loyalty to Romney for a while. Politico questioned it a while back.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56714.html
I think Matt still might have the hots for Ann. But what do I know?
I think Matt still might have the hots for Ann. But what do I know?
I have no more doubts about his objectives.
I've relied on Drudge -- a lot -- over the years. But I have had my skepticisms. At the risk of being flamed I will say, if Drudge had gone after Romney's Mormonism the way he habitually goes after Scientologists, Romney wouldn't be where he is now.
Perhaps there is a homosexual agenda in Drudge's antipathies. I don't know. But I see an anti-Gingrich bomb-thrower and I can't rely on Drudge anymore.
you vote for Romney then but I will not as you vote for the establishment types I will not neither will many around here and on here.
It’s nice to see some reasonableness here.
so many seem to have lost their sense of smell.
Get it?
Almost all of the anti-Newt Gingrich material hitting the media is coming from conservative institutions: National Review, The New York Sun, and the Washington Times. Just look at the Drudge Report from last night and early this morning
No. Color me clueless.
Its good to know that Drugee-dge still proves himself a Mitt the Mutt bot and his sorry excuse for a website that is not worth going to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.