Skip to comments.
Final PPP NH poll: Romney 35, Paul 18, Huntsman 16, Gingrich 12, Santorum 11
PPP polling firm ^
| Jan 8th
| ppp
Posted on 01/08/2012 8:31:13 PM PST by lilyfreeper
Santorum's so-called surge is all but gone. Huntsman is catching up.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0socialists4santorum; 1percentperry; 2lazy2getonballot; 2ndammendment; 3timeloser; backstabberromney; banglist; bigdig4u; bigdigromney; biggovernment; bigideas; bigjewelry; biglobbyist; bigsofa; bigsolutions; bigspender; bishopromney; breakfastattiffanys; callista; contractwiththeearth; controversyloses; crybaby; didiscuzzy; ethics300k; fakepoll; fakepoll4romney; florida; freddienewt; globalwarming; globalwarmingbook; gunfreezonenewt; gunrights; larazarick; loserromney; lousyorganization; missouri; mrpiousbaloney; newhampshire; newt1996lautenberg; newt4iowa; newtlautenberg; nhpollprimary; notonballot; pieazzdoughboy; piousadulterer; piousbaloney; polarizingissues; popegingrich; reasonableguncontrol; romneybotalert; romneycare4u; romneyfakepoll; romneypropaganda; southcarolina; thephoneyromney; virginia; whino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Diogenesis
Someone should ask this STUPID U.S. Mass Media (in the tank for RINOS and Obama)!!: "What is your definition of "front runner"? You have used it incessantly Romney even before the first votes. Also, what is the current GOP delegate count? If no one candidate leads in the committed delegate tote for the nominating convention, HOW IN THE HELL CAN YOU CALL ANYONE AS "FRONT RUNNER" UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT TO NARRATIVE IT THAT WAY WITH SOME KIND OF ACTIVIST AGENDA SUPERCEDING JOURNALISM?
41
posted on
01/08/2012 9:15:29 PM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(If FR slowly morphs from anti-Romney, via rationalizing, into supporting him like McCain, FR is over)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Looks like a ranking from Least Conservative to Most Conservative to me...
42
posted on
01/08/2012 9:27:04 PM PST
by
magritte
To: lilyfreeper
Gingrich at 12 and Huntsman at 16 ? That seems far fetched.
To: lilyfreeper
The PPP for Iowa 1/1/2012
Paul 20%, Romney 19%, Santorum 18%, Gingrich 14%, Perry 10%
The final results
Romney 24.6%, Santorum 24.5%, Paul 21.4%, Gingrich 13.3% Perry 10.3%
44
posted on
01/08/2012 9:31:51 PM PST
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
>HOW IN THE HELL CAN YOU CALL ANYONE AS “FRONT RUNNER” UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT TO NARRATIVE IT THAT WAY WITH SOME KIND OF ACTIVIST AGENDA SUPERCEDING JOURNALISM?<
Looks like some kind of freaky Name It And Claim It voodoo...
45
posted on
01/08/2012 9:32:31 PM PST
by
Califreak
("Burnt By The Sun")
To: lilyfreeper
46
posted on
01/08/2012 9:35:21 PM PST
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: lilyfreeper
So according to this poll, NH is either for the lib, the left, or the loon...why even have a NH primary?
47
posted on
01/08/2012 9:40:30 PM PST
by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior firepower is the cure)
To: lilyfreeper; 50mm; darkwing104; TheOldLady; Old Sarge
"Since Jan 1, 2012"
Two posts, both pro-Romney.
Here, Kitty, Kitty, Kitty...
Cheers!
48
posted on
01/08/2012 9:47:25 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: lilyfreeper
Actually, 35% for Romney in New Hampshire is considerably down from his peak. I pray that they collapse even worse by Tuesday.
49
posted on
01/08/2012 9:52:40 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
To: Diogenesis; lilyfreeper
Now, now, Diogenesis...lol.
It’s Huntsman’s turn to surge. He’s been living in New Hampshire.
The two first states are going to be death of us, because it enforces the false premise that Romney is the most electable.
50
posted on
01/08/2012 9:54:50 PM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
To: lilyfreeper
Didn’t that lib poll have the crackpot leading in Iowa and Santorum third?
To: Jack Hydrazine
How dare you ask logical questions like that! It will destroy the media narrative.
52
posted on
01/08/2012 9:55:49 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Diogenesis
Meanwhile, the crowds keep getting bigger for Santorum. One event had to be held outside, and the venue was changed for another.
To: Apollo5600
He’ll beat Obama if the debate is held in Beijing.
To: lilyfreeper
Hey, I’ll take this poll at face value. And here’s what it tells me.
A guy who has been running for President for 6 years and who has spent $50 million or so is getting 1/3 of the voters to support him in his most favorable state - a state in which he owns a home and which has a relatively liberal electorate compared to nearly every other primary and caucus state.
Or put another way: two-thirds of his most favorable electorate want nothing to do with him despite the entire MSM telling them ONLY he can win.
Does this sound like a winner to you?
Hank
55
posted on
01/08/2012 10:00:55 PM PST
by
County Agent Hank Kimball
(Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away. Num)
To: lilyfreeper
Oh, and one more thing.
Thank you for joining FR this week to promote Myth’s attempt to destroy the GOP once and for all.
It isn’t at all transparent.
Hank
56
posted on
01/08/2012 10:04:22 PM PST
by
County Agent Hank Kimball
(Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away. Num)
To: lilyfreeper
What BS, Santorum was never expected to win here. It has been Willard’s and Humpmans to lose from the beginning. And it has never meant anything.
57
posted on
01/08/2012 10:04:43 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: lilyfreeper
No one said it was not accurate, the BS was about Santorum and his surge, NH is not an indicator of anything, hell humpman has worked his rump off there and lost, he needs to go back to work for obummer.
58
posted on
01/08/2012 10:10:49 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: Antoninus
That is true willard has collapsed from his high.
59
posted on
01/08/2012 10:13:35 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: lilyfreeper
So we are supposed to back that stooge Huntsman because the lefty PPP says so? I'll pass. NH is a joke. It has an open Primary. That is why debris like Mittens and Huntsman are liked there. Wake me up when we get to a real state Primary like SC.
This Progressive idiot was debating in Chinese last night for crying out loud.
60
posted on
01/08/2012 10:20:59 PM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson