Purpose of FR and why we can never support Mitt Romney

vanity | Oct 15, 2011 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Our purpose and goal on FR is to restore, defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity!!

The goal of the domestic enemy (the left), i.e., the statist liberals, Marxists and progressives is just the opposite.

The goal of the establishment RINO is to gain control of political power, but not to otherwise rock the boat. The boat continues taking on water and listing sharper to port every time the left takes over, but the unprincipled RINOs do absolutely nothing to right her when they get a chance. In fact, the RINOs actually tack on plenty of their own unconstitutional baggage when they're in power and so our ship of state today is in pretty bad shape.

RINO Romney is one of the worst. We can thank him for being the chief architect of ObamaCare, which if we cannot get overturned and repealed, will finally accomplish the left's major objective of shredding the final remnants of our tattered constitution and ending our God-given Liberty forever (they think).

The liberals believe our constitution is a flawed document written in a different time for different circumstances by rich old racist white men and no longer applies to today's circumstances. They're now even trying to promote the idea that the constitution was never intended to limit or restrict the powers of government.

Like hell! That was and is its primary intent! And we who have sworn an oath to defend it, will defend it--from all enemies, foreign and domestic!

And that's FR's purpose and reason for being.

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Here's Romney's record on some of our primary issues of concern compared to Obama's:

Issue:	Obama	Romney
Pro-Abortion	check	check
Gun-grabber	check	check
Gay rights	check	check
Gov forced healthcare	check	check
Tax payer funded abortion	check	check
Man-made global warming	check	check
Liberal judges	check	check
Liberal appointees	check	check
Ted Kennedy pal	check	check
Proven liar	check	check
Fraud	check	check
Liberal Progressive	check	check
Enemy of Reagan/Bush	check	check
Enemy of the tea party	check	check
Enemy of Liberty	check	check
Defender of the Constitution	no	no
Conservative	no	no
Works across the aisle	no	yes
Architect of ObamaCare	no	yes
Domestic Enemy	check	check
Useful idiot	check	check

All of the above plus much more is documented in the RomneyTruth files on FR. Click the RomneyTruthFile keyword at the top of the main page. Also watch the "New Romney Campaign Video" also linked at the top of the main page. Watch it all the way through. I even saw some clips I'd never seen before. Pretty damning stuff for anyone running for president as a Republican.

Let's face it folks, the elite establishment RINO corps hates the tea party, hates conservatives, are afraid and even ashamed to have us identify ourselves as Republicans, feel we are dangerous extremist, racist, bigoted bible thumping, gun-toting, flag-waving neanderthals. The tea party is the best thing to happen for America since 1776 and our tea party candidates are the best thing for the GOP since Ronald Reagan, but what do the elite establishment RINOs do? They declare us the enemy! They went after Sarah Palin and some of our other tea party candidates with bared fangs and talons. Karl Rove and company were and continue to be as nasty and shameless on the attack as the nastiest lying liberal. Sarah Palin was the most exciting new face in GOP politics in a century and would have been a landslide 57 state victory over the corrupt, lying Marxist/progressive Obama. But the good ol' boys, i.e., the elite establishment corrupt crony capitalist GOP bastards could have none of that. Instead, they've opted to go all in with a corrupt, lying statist/progressive of their own: Willard (the Rat) Romney.

Well, good luck getting the Rat elected without the committed grassroots, pro-life, pro-constitution conservatives or the majority of the tea party.

FR, for one, will not play that game. NO MORE RINOS!!

No Romney. NOT ON FR!! NOT ON MY WATCH!!

Should Romney be "the one," I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs. Romney is no 80 percenter. Not even close! He's the backstabbing enemy within.

God bless America!!

Long live the Republic!!

[wagglebee]

Whatever troll.

[buccaneer81]

You need to learn your place, noob.

[reaganaut]

What, exactly, would you expect to get from a President Romney? (Dr. White)

More conservative Supreme Court nominees than I will from a President Obama. (nittany)

- - - - - -
BULLSHIT! It will never happen. Mitt will lie and say we need to nominate ‘those who can get confirmed’ then pick the most liberal under that guise, knowing the RINOS and libs will support it.

[rogue yam]

I think we are being bum-rushed into nominating Romney, but I also think there is still time.

After another debate or two, by mid-November or so, it will be time for all of us conservatives to have a serious discussion of tactics.

If we unite behind one candidate we can beat Romney. The question is when might we do so? Once the primary calendar is set, it would be a good thing if the grassroots could figure out some way to keep Romney from winning with only 25-35% support.

[CynicalBear]

Cain himself has said he doesn’t like those terms. At least you could honor Cain’s wishes if you support him.

[WalterSkinner]

Somewhere theres that great thread of Jims with 10,000+ posts

..now THAT was some thread...

[Sarajevo]

Romney had his day. It was almost 4 years ago, and he was beaten to the primaries by McCain and RP.

He needs to go away.

[Tennessee Nana]

:)

[Lazamataz]

Good Lord, n00b, you don't know when to leave well enough alone, DO YOU? Or pe'haps are you merely employing the well-documented and well-understood-by-us Delphi Technique?

Bottom line is, this is Free Republic, and our reputations have been hewn one line at a time over years. I don't care what you have done in MeatSpace. This is Cyber. Here, different rules are in play.

You coming on here with brass balls swingin', acting for every possible way like a Concern Troll or a practitioner of Delphi, WILL NOT GET RESPECT THAT WAY, HERE.

Which leads me to this clear-and-obvious Delphi: ...which clearly convey, every time that they are used, that those using them derive their own sense of self-worth from their personal FR sign-up date, clearly indicating a need to compensate for what they lack in the real world.

Me? What do I offer the real world? OOOoooo I dunno, just 11 years of Dot Net C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, SQL, JS, Ajax, Silverlight, Presentation and Communication Foundation, Enterprise level web development experience that I draw from, to serve an extremely prominent group who is delighted with not only my guru technical expertise, but my abilities with soft-skills as well; I serve many sponsees in an effort to let them find Recovery from what has them still in suffering; I have many dear friends; a wonderful family, and STILL manage to post quite a bit on Free Republic.

So, what is it that you are postulating I am lacking in real life?

... you freakin' Delphi-Technique arrogant piece of feces NOOB? :)

[buccaneer81]

Nobody lasts 11 years here as ANY of those three, noob.

[free me]

Many on FR have been mesmerized by Herman Cain’s sound bites in what passes for “debates” today when it is obvious that any candidate can throw out any sound bite at any debate
___________________________________________________________

Well, any candidate except Perry.

[Salamander]

A hunter of what?

Brylcreem bargains?

[Pilgrim's Progress]

My guess is that there are still a lot of Mormons on FR, and they will vote for Romney . . . according to prophecy that the last president will be a Mormon. I honestly don’t recall the source for that, but I know (as an ex-Mormon) that it was believed in the stake I was formerly a part of.

Those would be your Romneybots.

[Tennessee Nana]

Kid relax and be more concerned about defeating the poser Romney...

We need a REAL conservative as the GOP nominee...

[dfwgator]

Nobody lasts 11 years here as ANY of those three, noob.

Only 11 years? Noobs.

[Lazamataz]

Bet ya a buck you don't last a month.

Buc: So far, Dr. Noob hasn't earned a place in the Lazamataz Hobby List. But he IS being shortlisted. LOL

[TruthHound]

Stand your ground. With limited exception, they can’t defend their positions without the hyperbole.

I pray to God we don’t have to make that pathetic vote—again. I’m 50 years old, and have only ONCE voted FOR a Presidential candidate (1984) instead of AGAINST the lesser.

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

FR is not necessarily kind to Romney but Cain and Bachmann certainly are for some strange reason.

[Hat-Trick]

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Jim - thanks for stating this so succinctly. I'll never hold my nose and vote for this guy.

[buccaneer81]

LOLOLOLOL!!