Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE 3-White House denounces Perry as Republicans target Fed
Reuters ^ | 16 Aug 11 | Patricia Zengerle

Posted on 08/17/2011 3:53:03 AM PDT by SkyPilot

* Perry threatens Fed chairman, Bachmann also criticizes

* Remarks reflect intense political pressure on Fed

* White House says threatening Bernanke "not a good idea" (Adds fresh quotes from Bachmann, Obama, economist)

WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - The White House denounced Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry on Tuesday for his threatening remarks toward the head of the U.S. Federal Reserve that represented some of the most inflammatory rhetoric of the 2012 election campaign.

Campaigning in Iowa on Monday, the Texas governor said he would consider it "treasonous" if Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke "prints more money between now and the election" in November 2012 -- a fresh sign of the political heat the central bank faces as it tries to right the stumbling U.S. economy.

"If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don't know what y'all will do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas," Perry said to laughter from supporters in Iowa.

"Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous, treasonous in my opinion," he said.

The White House responded by saying it is important for the Fed to remain independent, and jabbed back at Perry, who on Saturday entered the race for the Republican nomination to face Democratic President Barack Obama. Perry is already considered one of the strongest candidates for the Republican nomination.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 45; benbernanke; bernake; bernanke; fed; federalreserve; idiot; idiots; perry; qe3; rickperry; rickperryperry2012; stupidparty; thefed; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: tomd2
You're right. Mark Levin made the point on his show yesterday.

People knew Perry wasn't saying Bernanke should be hanged.

It was comment on the continuing devaluation of our currency.

41 posted on 08/17/2011 7:53:28 AM PDT by newzjunkey (12yo's consent law, AB499 (Atkins), passed the CA Asm 50-25, Sen vote next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

The illegals are warming up to Perry too so you are in good company.


42 posted on 08/17/2011 8:03:23 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mo

I knew Calvin Coolidge had cut the income tax, and he’s generally credited with the economic prosperity of the 1920s. I didn’t know Warren Harding was an even bigger pro-growth, tax-cutting president until your post. I’ve just spent a little time reading up on him, and clearly he’s been overlooked by history and by conservatives. He unleashed the American private economy and started the economic boom that Coolidge (who was his VP) continued after Harding’s death. Very interesting—thanks for your informative post.


43 posted on 08/17/2011 8:09:10 AM PDT by American Quilter (aka American Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Perry said ALMOST treasoness - which it is.
Keep it up Rick !


44 posted on 08/17/2011 8:10:01 AM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

I don’ understand the support from an intelligent group of people. Perry’ love for the illegals will destroy the country even more than Obama. 12 million Democratic voters will be difficult to beat. If Perry would renounce his love of illegals, I certainly could support him. Even Obama has not brought up amnesty. What is it about Republicans that have this love for illegals. Reagan, bush and now Perry. I don’t get it.


45 posted on 08/17/2011 8:10:23 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Check out DU and daily KOS. Noone is happy. Hee hee.


46 posted on 08/17/2011 8:10:31 AM PDT by madameguinot (Our Father's God to Thee, Author of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PMAS

The only problem I have with the word treason is that it is used way too much and has watered down the word.


47 posted on 08/17/2011 8:14:02 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; SkyPilot; greyfoxx39
Even though I have SERIOUS reservations and take great exception to Perry's immigration stance...his visit to, speech and pandering to La Raza in 2010 is inexcusable and his own actions and statements about how we handle illegals already in this country will contribute to the continuing decline of our culture and nation...But the immigration issue and his so obvious stand on it, mean I will support another in the primaries. IMHO, you have to get all of those right.

And your Mormon church isn't "pandering" to illegals by employing them as official Mormon church bishops? (By "employment" I don't mean a "paycheck"; certainly Lds bishops get ministry expenses reimbursed by the Mormon church)
2 LDS branch presidents in Utah deported to Guatemala, El Salvador

IMHO, you have to get all of those right.

And your Mormon church -- they've "got it right?"
Considering The Disconnect Between Some LDS Church Members and Leadership on Immigration

It seems, Jeff, that you hold your GOP candidates to a higher stance than you do your church. But I guess unlike the Mormon church -- accountable to NO one -- GOP candidates are in sharp contrast accountable to the people.

48 posted on 08/17/2011 8:19:25 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Translation: internal polling scows a 49 to 1 victory of Perry over Obama.


49 posted on 08/17/2011 8:22:25 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
greyfoxx39...you are showing your unbelievable bias, prejudice, and bad judgement.

As a matter of fact, NO, I will not be supporting Romney as any reading of my posts over the years, or a simple vist to my site would show.

My 1st choice is Sarah Palin, followed at this point by Bachman, then Cain...depending on who else gets in the race...followed probably by Santorum...all before Perry and Romney.

Now, if it came down to (which I do not believe it will) a vote between Romney and Obama, it is clear how I would pull that lever.

So, greyfoxx39, take your bias and prejudicial judgement (and it is really out of hand if you cannot see it yourself) and just can it, or stick it some other place where the sun don't shine.

50 posted on 08/17/2011 8:28:06 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You’ll end up supporting him when he is the GOP nominee. There’s no one out there that can do what Perry can do. He doesn’t backpedal after his strong remarks he makes/made. And actually the bottom line for Americans are jobs and the economy. NO one running has a record like that....only Perry does. And as Carville said...it’s the economy stupid...everyone can dance around screaming about Perry he did this, that and is this, that...but in the end they’ll vote to defeat barry.


51 posted on 08/17/2011 8:31:47 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I have the same reservations you do about Perry doing the walk, but I sure do like the way he talks the talk.

As far as I’m concerned any Republican who criticizes what he just said about the Fed and its sniveling little perps is part of the America hating enemy.

Santorum was not catching on (because of the Twoomey/Specter thing IMO) anyway, but this should pretty much end him.


52 posted on 08/17/2011 8:32:01 AM PDT by Sal (Charlie Brown, ignore the football. Kick Lucy in the head instead. HARD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I have the same reservations you do about Perry doing the walk, but I sure do like the way he talks the talk.

As far as I’m concerned any Republican who criticizes what he just said about the Fed and its sniveling little perps is part of the America hating enemy.

Santorum was not catching on (because of the Twoomey/Specter thing IMO) anyway, but this should pretty much end him.


53 posted on 08/17/2011 8:41:02 AM PDT by Sal (Charlie Brown, ignore the football. Kick Lucy in the head instead. HARD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: shield

Oh he has my vote in the general 100 percent. Last week I was saying I would write in Sarah but changed my mind because of Obama’s behavior the last few days. Can’t live with myself if Obama won by one vote. I vote in PA so who knows what will be left by then to vote in the primary. We vote in April which is pretty late.


54 posted on 08/17/2011 8:46:14 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“...threatening remarks ...”

Notice how anything that is said that is remotely disparaging (and true) about this administration, and the chickensh*t POS in charge, is labeled “threatening”?

2012 can’t get here soon enough.


55 posted on 08/17/2011 8:46:49 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo

Good info about Harding, I had no idea how effective he was. I never read or heard this before. No way his methods will be implemented these days, surrenders too much power (and responsibility) back to we the people.

I also believe that it wouldn’t take much for an economic recovery to be unleashed. With the handcuffs taken off, it would almost explode. I can even see the possibility of it requiring some form of restraint. “Afterburners” is accurate.


56 posted on 08/17/2011 8:48:13 AM PDT by CPO retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
>>>>>White House says threatening Bernanke "not a good idea"

Perry's zinger is no big deal. No threat just truth.

57 posted on 08/17/2011 8:52:20 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
I have and continue to speak out against the very things you cite.

The Church's mission however is principally to save souls...and there are members and leaders who take that injunction, which Christ himself gave, beyond reason when working within the constitutional frame work of our laws.

When I see it, I speak out about it, either with individuals or in council meetings in leadership.

Individual members and some leaders of all church's make mistakes. They are human. We saw it in the new testament after Christ's death for goodness sake. That does not stand in the way of Christ's atonement, or my own dedication to my faith.

Problem is, you are trying to attack the church (which seems to be our principle aim) now through political actions. The church stands on moral grounds and has been very effective and critical in the fight against abortion, against homosexuality, and any number of other things.

I do not agree with the actions of some regarding illegal immigrants. We can teach them of Christ and are equipped to do so, in Mexico or Honduras or wherever else as well as here. They should be returned to their homeland if they are here illegally.

But I do not owe you an explanation...though I give it in an attempt to show you how your bias is leading you to judgemental statements that simply are not true.

Your judgement of me, without knowing my own actions reflects on your bias and prejudice which you are allowing to taint that judgement.

Read my post 50 to greyfoxx39,...its for you too.

58 posted on 08/17/2011 8:54:18 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
What's fascinating to me is 10-1 comments AGAINST Obummer at the REUTERS link!!!!!

Why is it fascinating to you? Because we are led to believe that barry will be hard to beat. That's why NO ONE should listen to polls/the media!! You just read how the voters are thinking - not propaganda.
59 posted on 08/17/2011 8:56:26 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

There is a bill in Congress with 300 sponsors from both sides of the aisle to audit the Fed. The idea that we have an unelected group of people with such power and the lack of transparency should be of concern to all Americans. Perry is just stating the obvious. It is also a good political move.


60 posted on 08/17/2011 9:04:31 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson