Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!
This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.
I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!
Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!
well said on all posts to this poster.
Seems the poster has been listening to their homo friend and bought into all their propaganda.
As for those who say some keep it private then obviously this friend of the poster does not as the poster knows that they are a homosexual
You were being specific and not general. And broke FR's rule about pinging the poster you are talking about.
Your only problem with me is the homosexual agenda threads. Since I DON'T support it, you must and that is why you have a problem. If you DID NOT support it, you would have never noticed me enough to remember me or my brother.
they are not GAY THEY ARE HOMOSEXUALS, you have bought the queer lies it seems
No...YOU misunderstood my post and now you are dancing..not me. I have made myself perfectly clear and I have no idea what you are talking about with the Tru Blew crap. What is it? Should I google it to make sure you are not propagating some outright lie about me? I’ve never even heard of it!
So, you think the definition of conservatism should somehow embrace sodomy?
What about bestiality?
How about polygamy?
Is incest a conservative position?
Jim Robinson defines conservatism on FR. Civil unions is part of the agenda that he posted about.
On this thread, no less....
No YOU misunderstood my ping! :-)
Real love has to be informed by truth. Love does not condone or put a pretty face on mental illness, immorality or sexual perversion. Cheney is a fool for promoting the homosexual agenda. It is indeed possible to love a family member while disapproving of their mental illness - which homosexuality is. It is a life destroying perversion and there is help for people who identify as homosexual. There are countless thousands of former homosexuals.
If someone had a relative who was a thief, or a heroin addict, it is loving to promote "theivery is fine" or "let's have tolerance for heroin addicts"? NO! Love mixed with toleration of evil is not love; love that accepts mental illness as a legitimate lifestyle is not love, and it doesn't help the person afflicted.
Real love means letting the person you love know that they don't have to be "gay" and that there is help available.
Opps..my bad...I thought you were responding to me. Please disregard my post. I hate conflicts and didn’t even take the time to see which post you were responding to...LOL!
Yikes..I am going to slink away now. Please accept my sincere apologies.
Thank you for calling "Ask the Prophet!"
Every call is important to us.
All lines are presently in use.
If you wish to access the Ask the Prophet FAQ sheet, Press 1 to be connected to LDS.ORG
If you wish to access the Ask the Prophet FAQ sheet en Espanol, Pulse 2 para ser conectado a LDS.ORG
If you wish to talk to the Living Prophet, please standby and a representitive will be with you shortly.
After receiving an answer from the Living Prophet, Press 3 to hear a unanimous affirmation of TRUTH by 12 sub-representitives.
(Cue background music: Praise to the Man)
Thank you for calling "Ask the Prophet!"
Every call is important to us.
All lines are presently in use.
.
.
.
.
I don't know, Wagglebee. What do you think my positions are on those subjects? You seem to have an unfettered view into my thought processes.
lol
correct and well said , what I would like to know is why they use our platform, our party, even this site to push their liberal social, open border,lack of military agenda on here, hell even at CPAC the likes of the nutty one stands there and lectures us on what we should accept.
They are liberal on many points so let them use their own party, it’;s not like it would hurt us too much anyway
I realize that. But I am unaware that the requirements for posting here are agreeing with JR 100% of the time on 100% of the issues.
Btw, True Blue is a forum where banned and disgruntled freepers post. Some FReepers post there and complain about FR. Someone sent out FReepmails trying to recruit posters from FR. It's more lefty than conservative and they spend a lot of time bashing FR, Jim and particular FReepers.
Stop bye Mount Carmel.
I can help you out.
My advice is reread what he posted and don't support civil unions on FR.
love your username, he was a great man
Comparing those who support traditional aka “Real” morality to Fred Phelps and the Taliban is not only a cheap shot, it’s actively offensive and I’m sick of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.