Cheers!
Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!
This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.
I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!
Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!
All’s good here; hope you and yours are well too :))
J.R. suffers from an ambiguity deficiency.
This a few minutes..ago..the thread moving along fast clip..
anyone supporting big-govt, abortion or faggotry isn’t conservative anyway so ZOT the bastards!
And labor unions too.
***********
Don’t get me started on those lazy losers. Outlaw all unions ASAP, imo. Unions suck!
[Well, unless those two are part of the homosexual agenda, they’ll keep their yaps shut. If they don’t, they’re not conservatives. ]
I am talking about the minority of the minority who don’t think they should be making public displays of their sexuality in public and keep their business between consenting adults behind closed doors on their own property and away from any minors. One who have finally woken up to the fact that big government once setup can become a tool that could be used in the future against them. By my estimations due to the homosexual political agenda running rampant in this country there are like two of them in the whole country.
I have a funny story, I have a friend who is a homosexual who is finally starting to wake up to the fact that Obama is cashing checks he cannot cover. I had an exchange with her that went something like this:
Me: So what do you think of all these czars and regulatory agencies that Obama is putting in place?
Her: Well I think some of them are a good idea.
Me: So you like a Government that is more involved in the personal lives of the governed?
Her: Yes, as long as it is for the public good and helps with the promotion of public health.
Me: So “as long as it is public good” and if it is not mis-used, then you are ok with increasing the role of the government like Obama has?
Her: Yes, and I think the Democrats are doing a good job of making things better.
Me: So what happens with all this machinery that Obama has put into place with out any protest from the Main Steam media or the “Liberty Loving Democrats”? What happens if a “Ultra Hard Right Republican” gets put into the white house? Won’t those same tools you once lauded as the best thing as sliced bread be used against you?
Her: I don’t think that could ever happen.
Me: That is what is said many times in history, when you give the government extra power it keeps wanting more and more and before too long the same bureaucracies that were setup to help a group of people are ultimately used against it.
Her: Well I guess we have to worry about the Tea Party.
Me: Not as much as your liberal friends would have you think, The Tea Party stands for limited government meaning they don’t want the government, especially the Federal government telling them what they can and cannot eat, drink, smoke, or do behind their own closed doors. They may not agree morally with how you live your life but they will not be for putting in place government mechanisms in place to tell you what you and a consenting adult do behind your own closed doors.
Her: Well I am just worried what would happen is someone like Fred Phelps was elected president.
Me: You really think people on the Conservative Right are all alike Fred Phelps? Every conservative I know has great disdain for Fred Phelps because he is a complete lunatron. But assuming you scenario came true, the power grabs by the Democrats to give unelected regulatory agencies more power would be disastrous to homosexuals. Don’t you understand that you gave the keys to the country to someone who may not be there in the future? Don’t you realize that one of the things that concerns conservatives is that by giving the federal government more power you diminish the inherent rights of people to chose their own destinies in the name of “the public good”. The Public good was used to justify the sterilization of people in the 1920’s and 30s. Once the power is given away the “Public good” can be used and HAS been used to justify atrocities that are horrendous in scope. It may seem like a good idea now, but those are seeds that grow the weeds of your own destruction.
Her: ......(stunned silence)
I don’t know if I got her to think, but I did give her something to think about. LOL.
Some here may think it is useless to argue with someone so entrenched, but I view it as good verbal training, plus when you can get a lib to think it is both a scary thing and a beautiful thing as it is like watching someone use muscles they haven;t used in years, they walk away muttering “ow, ow, owie” under their breath, and that is delicious.
Dear Jim,
I have been a very long time ‘lurker’ of this great forum.... but your post has caused me to finally want to join. I almost lost hope of late, watching all the rhino’s post and reply to true conservatives with growing and not so subtle distain... but to see your constant ‘hand’ of ‘velvet wrapped steel’ continue to guide is enough to give me hope that perhaps there STILL is a place to be heard!
I am proud to be a member of this forum and will try my best to contribute in a manner worthy of it.
That post remains one of the funniest things I've ever read.
Cheers!
That’s great.
Ya, workin on a touch of empty nest syndrome here... ya know how that can be. My best to you, Nic.
Thanks for pointing to that. I had never seen it before.
I’m dieing here! Laughed so hard I damn near fell off the chair!
Good catch, clearly a DNC plant. If you don't support the Sodomite Agenda you are a crazy "gun nut", what ever that is, and must be a Branch Davidian type. Typical Libtard reaction.
It's always the same arguement with the special interest group trolls:
Support the homosexual agenda or the homosexuals are going to vote for the Democrats
Support affirmative action or the blacks are going to vote for the Democrats
Support amnesty or the hispanics are going to vote for the Democrats.
Abandon fiscal conservatism or the MSM drones will vote for the Democrats.
Their inane strategy is to abandon all principles and try to be just like the Democrats. And we're supposed to pretend that people who hold these liberal beliefs wouldn't vote for the Democrats anyhow.
I’m a little unclear. When you say “does not and will not,” what do you mean exactly? (Kidding! I’m kidding. *ducks*)
>> NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS
Great statement regarding any and all aspiring and seated politicians.
When they came for the Rommeybots, I didn’t say anything, because I didn’t know what one was...
When they came for the Palinistas, I didn’t object, because I was tired of their cheerleading also...
When they came for the Paulites, I didn’t object, because that old guy just creeps me out sometimes...
But when they came for contributions, I didn’t. Because I was broke. But still I couldn’t be sure I wouldn’t be next.
Jim, with all due respect, it seems these outbursts are becoming more frequent, and more vehement. Perhaps I’ve missed the hordes of RINO spammers tormenting your servers. Perhaps I’ve missed the contamination spawned by linking to a fascinating interview with Corsi on infowars. I was under the impression that reasonable discussion was tolerated, even to the point of putting up with blatant idiots (for a while at least).
In other words, you used to blame - and zot - the messenger, not the entire subject of the message. Has the policy changed? Did I miss the memo?
I’m confused. I’ve never conflated people discussing things on FR with FR endorsing said things. Should I?
Obviously, it’s your house, and you owe me nothing - while I owe you a great deal for providing such an interesting place to come and learn.
But how are we to learn the evils of RINOs and other strange things if such discussions are not allowed?
I’m a little unclear. When you say “does not and will not,” what do you mean exactly? (Kidding! I’m kidding. *ducks*)
Should be required reading. Too many n00bs just don’t understand all the work that goes on behind the scenes of an epic Zot.
Cheers!
You have to be the dumbest bastard I have ever seen zotten on FR. Have you not read one thread in your long time here? Do you even know what a Conservative is? Your comment wreaks of dead RINO.
You should pay attention to your surroundings, dope. ZOT ya later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.