Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schools may ban chocolate milk over added sugar
Yahoo News ^ | May 9, 2011 | Associated Press

Posted on 05/09/2011 7:22:38 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

With schools under increasing pressure to offer healthier food, the staple on children's cafeteria trays has come under attack over the very ingredient that made it so popular — sugar.

Some school districts have gone as far as prohibiting flavored milk, and Florida considered a statewide ban in schools. Other districts have sought a middle ground by replacing flavored milks containing high-fructose corn syrup with versions containing sugar, which some see as a more natural sweetener.

Los Angeles Unified, the nation's second-largest school district, is the latest district to tackle the issue. Superintendent John Deasy recently announced he would push this summer to remove chocolate and strawberry milk from school menus.

But nutritionists — and parents — are split over whether bans make sense, especially when about 70 percent of milk consumed in schools is flavored, mostly chocolate, according to the industry-backed Milk Processors Education Program.

Many, including the School Nutrition Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Dietetic Association, American Heart Association, and National Medical Association, argue that the nutritional value of flavored low-fat or skim milk outweighs the harm of added sugar. Milk contains nine essential nutrients including calcium, vitamin D and protein.

A joint statement from those groups points to studies that show kids who drink fat-free, flavored milk meet more of their nutrient needs and are not heavier than non-milk drinkers.

"Chocolate milk has been unfairly pegged as one of the causes of obesity," said Julie Buric, vice president of marketing for the Milk Processors Education Program.

Others note the nation's child obesity epidemic and say flavored milk simply needs to go.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Colorado; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: ban; children; chocolatemilk; flavoredmilk; health; losangeles; milke; nannystate; nutrition; obesity; schools; sugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/09/2011 7:22:43 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084; paltz; SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; traviskicks; ...

Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 05/09/2011 7:23:59 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I hate politically correct sorosmonkey superheroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Big brother at work


3 posted on 05/09/2011 7:26:52 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Chocolate milk is a part of childhood. You remove it over my dead body.


4 posted on 05/09/2011 7:27:02 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Why are schools even providing milk — of any flavor? Go back to individual responsibility and parents providing food and drinks for their kids. Schools have no business being in the business of feeding kids - breakfast and lunch and in some cases more than that.


5 posted on 05/09/2011 7:27:15 AM PDT by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

California. ‘nuff said.

It’s not the chocolate milk — it’s the lack of exercise. Sugar in and of itself DOES NOT make you fat.


6 posted on 05/09/2011 7:27:52 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
...replacing flavored milks containing high-fructose corn syrup with versions containing sugar...

Why do this?

7 posted on 05/09/2011 7:28:30 AM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Chocolate Milk.

Just another high priority, acheivable goal for the Educator Bureaucracy.

In other news, 47% of Detroiters are illiterate.


8 posted on 05/09/2011 7:30:44 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevinm13

Well, the liberal view is that, since so many children are “poor”, they must be fed at school, because their parents are not able to provide basic foods for them.

Now, I know this ignores the fact that these parents on public assistance are getting the food stamp ATM type card to buy food. The liberal view of an issue doesn’t always quite make sense. But, as in this case, the liberal view becomes our official social policy on the issue.


9 posted on 05/09/2011 7:32:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Banning chocolate milk is racist!

10 posted on 05/09/2011 7:35:45 AM PDT by TSgt ("Some folks just need killin'" - Sling Blade (2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is such a thing as low fat chocolate milk.

The point is...you want these kids to be drinking milk...and it fills them up, it's good for their bones...and better than soda...or water.

11 posted on 05/09/2011 7:41:22 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

>>> Schools may ban chocolate milk over added sugar

The only solution is to put the Wookie between the chocolate milk and school officials then.


12 posted on 05/09/2011 7:42:22 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The industry argument of (milk vs flavored milk) is a false dichotomy, the real choice is (milk vs non-milk drinks) if flavored milk is banned from schools it will lose it’s taste in the next generation of children.

In Mexico, flavored milk drinks have much higher levels of sugar than in the United States, worse yet, Disney Corporation franchises their characters to Coca Cola distributorships, these flavored milk distribution channels south of the border are using Disney characters to promote that crap. Coca Cola has a south of the border label called Minute Maid Nutri+ which is just a horrible product to feed children,

I’m certain Coca Cola will be lobbying to lower the FDA guidelines for school served milk in the future to sell the equivalent of Minute Maid Nutri+ in the United States.


13 posted on 05/09/2011 7:51:03 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Let’s take the joy out of living. Too much enjoyment of life may make you forgo voting Democrat. Can’t have that.


14 posted on 05/09/2011 7:51:41 AM PDT by badgerlandjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Plus if the kids get 2 or 3 meals at school and a backpack of food for the weekend (which really fries me), it frees up the parent(s) to buy steak and nice things that other people can’t afford these days. Would hate to deprive them. And then there are the WIC shoppers who buy 4+ gallons of milk at once, yeah, like that’s gonna be consumed in YOUR household only? Seriously doubt it.


15 posted on 05/09/2011 7:52:28 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
There is such a thing as low fat chocolate milk.

Most children should not be given low fat milk, IMO.

Childrens' developing brains need more fats to develop properly.

The problem with most chocolate milk that is served in schools, IMO, is not the sugar content -- instead, it's the fact that the wholesome milk fat has been removed, and replaced with cheap palm or coconut oil. Neither of those fats is good for children or adults.

16 posted on 05/09/2011 7:52:28 AM PDT by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

This one actually is racist,
every study on the matter shows Hispanic kids have a much higher craving for immediate satisfaction in their foods, the Milk industry wants to make sure they don’t lose customers as more of the youth population becomes Hispanic with each passing school year...

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:bGSwhQJq39kJ:repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/237/1/etd.pdf+children’s+flavored+milk+in+caribbean&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESg1a9Pz5z5LhKqda8rQMDzK9—BCtEvA-RToRWEV4SjoVTuDTrxdw4dHgxmjIh71S0xLx6aNeWA2DW0BLxxJq81SElEujyEnnKBB8pgPI8i2Vkx6oREjmkJpW2ZuW5RBlYwpDjm&sig=AHIEtbQIRx34ZNN_P2tm1BMmIickUUrveA

I only know about this due to having a customer who imports specialty items from South America for the immigrant population here in NJ, one of her big items is this Peruvian/Colombian flavored milk drink (with unlicensed US copyrighted cartoon characters to boot!) that all the parents grew up with in Peru/Colombia, and so buy it for their kids here in NJ... I tasted it, some of the sugariest drink I’ve ever had.

Coca Cola Mexico introduced a similar drink in Mexico, but didn’t pick up sales until they licensed the Disney characters in 2005...


17 posted on 05/09/2011 7:57:47 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Maybe they need to ban video games.


18 posted on 05/09/2011 7:59:20 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

Do you have links for the replacement of fat ?
I suggest you might be mistaken...


19 posted on 05/09/2011 7:59:35 AM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Chocolate milk is a part of childhood. You remove it over my dead body.


Keep it. Just don’t expect taxpayers to pay for liquid candy that’s bad for you.


20 posted on 05/09/2011 8:07:15 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (...a.k.a. "Norm L. C. Bias")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson