CNN via BREAKING on Drudge: White House releases Obama birth certificate

CNN ^ | 27 APR 11 | DCBryan1

[DCBryan1]

(CNN) The White House released President Obama’s original birth certificate Wednesday.

The surprise release follows recent and sustained remarks by businessman Donald Trump, among others, that raised doubts as to whether the president was born in the United States.

[butterdezillion]

Janice Okubo has said that for Oahu births the BC# was assigned on the “date filed”.

[tsowellfan]

Yeah, I’ve been reading where the White House has actually hired people to post on the social networks and in other forums. Some of them real people, some of them bots. Some of them masking as republicans whose job is to discredit conservatives and make it look like Obama 100% truthful.

[FW190]

"Good find kabar....the Nordyke COLB looks rough, chaotic, and official....something way too clean and neat about Obamas.

My son was born 6 months ago, and we had alot of fun examining it and making sure it is safe in case he want to run for POTUS....but it was messy and chaotic looking, as it should be.

THIS POTUS COLB STINKS!"

AND why is the local registrar in BLOCK 22 different on Obummers long form vs. the Nordyke COLB?

[aphid]

Someone has kindly broken down the .pdf into more elements.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B7RBLw083OS5NjI4NGY2YTItZjMyOC00ODZjLThkY2EtNzlkZTc3NmNkZmE0&hl=en&pli=1

[RedWhiteBlue]

“Why is her name listed as Stanley Ann Dunham Obama?? Were they married?” And why is her name printed as Stanley Ann Dunham, but her “signature” is Stanley Ann Dunham Obama?

Box 13 asks for the mother's maiden name, and whether or not they were married, "Obama" isn't part of her maiden name.

[Tatze]

So, if they laid it on a copier? How come the rest of the document, even to the left of the rounded edge (from the binding) is so seamless and of the same background as the paper the document is printed on. Last time I looked, the backstops on copiers are white backgrounds.

The background of the COLB is white. The backstop of the copier is white. The paper it is copied onto has the green security hash, so the green background is seamless.

[AnonymousConservative]

Tough to say. The photo has layers, which it shouldn’t, but some are saying that some archiving software generates layers automatically to later facilitate turning parts of the image into text.

What we do appear to know, is somebody took a scan of Obama’s BC, printed it on Security paper, it then was given a seal, rescanned, and delivered as a digital file with the sael nearly invisible, with layers, which may or may not be significant to it’s digital history. Still don’t know why it couldn’t just be photocopied, or released as a highres image, or why a media personality couldn’t jsut be given access to the original.

Or more importantly, why it wasn’t released when Military members began asking for it.

[NoGrayZone]

That’s what the 3rd page of the layered “BC” looks like....

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B7RBLw083OS5NjI4NGY2YTItZjMyOC00ODZjLThkY2EtNzlkZTc3NmNkZmE0&hl=en

[TaxRelief]

The batch being processed may have been reversed.

[Sophia777]

what about Corsi’s book?

[dennisw]

Note that on Nordyke’s COLB box 7c says “Honolulu, **Oahu**, but BHO’s box 7c says “Honolulu, **Hawaii**>>>>>>>

It seems silly to say Honolulu, Hawaii. Of course the BC is in Hawaii. Saying Honolulu, Oahu makes more sense

[thesearethetimes...]

Scrub Deterrent Bump

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

In 1961? Sheesh, and the northern yokels like to laugh at the hick redneck rubes about young wives?

In Delaware, until about 1895 or so, it was 7.

[thouworm]

CORRECTION to my original post. Post #849 below was the initial post on this thread regarding the layering.

To: All

Whoa. I was listening to Rush just now...and he was talking about an email he received from someone who said that this document is an obvious fraud...and here’s how you can check.

Download the PDF from above and open it in Adobe Illustrator, and you can see all the layers showing how the document was pieced together.

So... I did. I downloaded the file...and opened it in Illustrator...and indeed... this document has been pieced together. It’s a layered file. You can click and hide various layers until the screen is blank.

Now... look. I’m tired of this stupid argument. I really am. But as a graphic artist, I can tell you that if someone scanned in an image and saved it as a PDF, it would have been a solid, single layer. The only way that I know of for it to be broken down into layers is if it had been manipulated and created digitally.

Feel free to call me a whatever...but see for yourself if what that person Rush mentioned said is right.

849 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:08:58 PM by PowerPro (Conservative Revolution Reborn! Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711155/posts?page=849#849
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

See new aphid post #984 on this thread
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

and related thread on layering I previously cross-posted by RED SOUTH

Obama’s Birth Certificate, Dissected
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711307/posts

[Khepri]

Thanks for stating it so powerfully!

Thanks, but it's a cut and paste...from the link...can't take credit, but was equally impressed with the way he stated it!...;)

[rlferny]

My daughter was born in 1992 in Montana and she received a long form birth certificate. So not that long ago did states still issue long forms

[KarlInOhio]

Here are the 9 images I found in the PDF file. They came out of "Some PDF Image Extract" http://www.somepdf.com/some-pdf-image-extract.html rotated 90 degrees and I decided not to modify them any further. I don't know if the jpg image is the original compression or if the extractor recompressed it. Also I didn't change images 1-8 which came up as white on black images.

There might be more image information in the PDF which I didn't extract, but this should give an indication of what is in the PDF file.

Image 0 is the background with most of the text knocked out like cyberaxe showed.

mage 1 was the main body of the PDF file stored as a monochrome image. Those letters still shown in full in Image 0 are missing from Image 1.

Image 2 was the registrar's signature block.

Image 3 was the APR 25 2011 date stamp.

Image 4 was part of the date stamp from block 22. The rest showed up in image 1.

Image 5 was the date stamp from block 20 missing the final 1 in the date, which showed up in image 1.

Image 6 was the letters "Non" from None in block 17a (the E showed up in image 1).

Image 7 was a 243x217 pixel region of somewhat random pixels. I can't tell the source.

Image 8 was a similar 132x142 pixel region.

[Tatze]

Janice Okubo has said that for Oahu births the BC# was assigned on the “date filed”.

Ok. Thats what I assumed as well. And if the Nordyke and Obama COLB's were 'filed' on the same day (the dates on the forms are 'Accepted' not 'Filed'), it is still very plausible that the forms were filed such that the Nordykes would have lower numbers than Obama.

[TennesseeGirl]

Seriously, folks, WHY is Honolulu's Local Registrar U-something-Lee (almost looks like Ukelelee) on Aug 4, 1961 for Obama's certificate, but a different name on the Nordyke twins BC (Aug 11, 1961)???? Did the Registrar change in 7 days?

[Gaffer]

Yankees....go figure..