Skip to comments.
Ban-happy SF targets male circumcision
Washington Examiner ^
| 11/12/2010
| Joshua Sabatini
Posted on 11/12/2010 12:25:33 PM PST by markomalley
The Board of Supervisors just banned toys in Happy Meals, which drew worldwide attention.
Now the latest ban being proposed in San Francisco is on male circumcision.
A proposed ballot measure for the November 2011 ballot when voters will be electing the San Franciscos next mayor would amend The Citys police code to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.
Doing so would result in a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail, according to the proposed measure submitted to the Department of Elections.
The measure was submitted by San Francisco resident Lloyd Schofield, who has spoken up on this issue in the past.
He was not immediately available for comment.
For the ordinance to make it on to the November ballot, it would require the collection of 7,168 valid signatures by April 26, 2011.
It's unknown if Schofield approached members of the Board of Supervisors asking them to vote on such a measure before deciding to take it to the voters.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; circumcision; culturewar; judeochristian; napl; sanfrancisco; sanfransicko; sexpositiveagenda; sheeruttermadness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: VOA
It's been a while, but in the Roman Catholic tradition, 1 January USED to be celebrated as The Feast of the Circumcision (formerly a Holy Day of Obligation), referring to Jesus' ritual circumcision.
Both of my sons were born in the Army hospital at Camp Zama, Japan. All male infants were circumcised before mother and child were discharged.
41
posted on
11/12/2010 12:55:33 PM PST
by
Ax
To: day10
“Why on earth should this person (or persons) care? Seriously.”
Well, when they have sex with young boys, they like the foreskin to be there.
42
posted on
11/12/2010 12:56:26 PM PST
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Right Cal Gal
But having a BRIS is a public outrage. Got it.Apparently its all about the JOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSS! (And simply preventative hygiene.)
43
posted on
11/12/2010 12:57:07 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
To: markomalley
First cops in barber shops and now THIS? What - will it now be illegal to 'take a little off the top' no matter where you go?
Outrageous!
44
posted on
11/12/2010 12:59:53 PM PST
by
Quality_Not_Quantity
(A half-truth masquerading as the whole truth becomes a complete untruth. (J.I. Packer)
To: FrogMom
Does this apply to both males and females or are they giving the mooselimbs a pass?
_____________________________________________
You would think that circumcizing the foreskin of a penis would apply to males.
But, this is San Fransicko we’re talking about, so who knows???
Look. Even the language in this bill is ambiguous....
to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.
I think they should have been more Frisco specific.....
to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person (MALE, FEMALE, SHEMALE, IT, WHATEVER, ETC.....) who has not attained the age of 18.
45
posted on
11/12/2010 1:00:15 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: markomalley
Hospitals in Oakland and San Jose better expand their birthing wings.
46
posted on
11/12/2010 1:01:01 PM PST
by
Minn
To: markomalley; All
Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Why? What is really behind this?
47
posted on
11/12/2010 1:01:08 PM PST
by
ColdOne
(Repeal HealthCare......)
To: ColdOne
See post 38. I think this FReeper may be onto something.
48
posted on
11/12/2010 1:03:08 PM PST
by
day10
(Integrity has no need of rules.)
To: FrogMom
or are they giving the mooselimbs a pass?Male circumcision is required by Islam.
To: Notary Sojac
I have a mohel on the Court who leaks information to me from time to time..... :-)
50
posted on
11/12/2010 1:03:19 PM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: markomalley
If Mickey Ds had changed the name of their Happy Meals to Gay Meals they wouldn't have been banned!
Saw this somewhere today (?????)
51
posted on
11/12/2010 1:03:58 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: markomalley
If Mickey Ds had changed the name of their Happy Meals to Gay Meals they wouldn't have been banned!
Saw this somewhere today (?????)
52
posted on
11/12/2010 1:04:22 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: markomalley
"Oy vay, and WTH am I supposed to do?"
53
posted on
11/12/2010 1:04:44 PM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: markomalley
What a bunch of schmucks.
54
posted on
11/12/2010 1:05:12 PM PST
by
rfp1234
To: goat granny
The government now owns your johnson....could your boys be next...
hold tight onto them guys...
_____________________________________________________
I.... I......
I can't believe you said that!
55
posted on
11/12/2010 1:05:49 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: markomalley
Tolerance is all about telling people what they aren’t allowed to do.
56
posted on
11/12/2010 1:05:49 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: ShadowAce
>>This measure could make abortion illegal if its interpreted correctly.<<<
Good one.
Only for male babies, however—females could still be aborted.
To: markomalley
To: markomalley
BUT, it’s okay to stuff gerbils up your butt.
Perhaps these freaks have gotten this procedure confused with Happy Meals.
59
posted on
11/12/2010 1:15:21 PM PST
by
Gator113
(Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
To: Question Liberal Authority
60
posted on
11/12/2010 1:19:42 PM PST
by
Nea Wood
(Silly liberal . . . paychecks are for workers!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson