Posted on 10/24/2010 6:57:34 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
(this was posted in a previous thread about America dying, with no reply from men, as has become too sadly familiar) ----------------------------------------------------
When a country lifts up a man like Bill Clinton that defiled the Oval Office as none has ever done, the media throws their arms around him, he is not held accountable nor has HE EVER OFFERED THE MUCH TORTURED APOLOGY SO MANY CONSERVATIVES ARE ASKED TO DO, FOR MINOR SLIPS OF THE TONGUE....
Our world has gone upside down.
Clinton should have hung his head in shame and and been ostracized from society. This lack of moral decency, a lowering of any standard of integrity other than some manufactured BS, opened the doors for a corrupt and lying Barack Obama.
We, the people, including the media should have rejected Clinton for his craven acts in our most honorable place. He should be invisible today.
But since so many citizens now are addicted to pornographic behaviors that they do not want to exorcize, once good people said nothing.
Come on, Free Republic people—especially the males—to be a decent human beings, you need to stop protecting the moral decay for your own tittilation and stand a stand, make a decision, take a side. It is required of you.
That means raising yourself to a better place, and it begins with each of us.
I notice again and again, when the topic is brought home, the males either rabidly castigate this as puritannical ( it is not, it about slow genocide at the altar of individidual and selfish base sensation)-—or they dive under a rock and say nothing while the world their families are supposed to thrive in, withers away in putrid decay.
And yes, violence is begetted, because love is lost and selfishness and loathesome, base addiction wins.
The bitter irony is that the fashionable target to attack instead is the church, religion, faith—while protecting the vile inhumanity of rank and devouring pornography flowing into every aspect of our living.
The church is not perfect, because it is made up of imperfect people, but her sextant is clear. Her tonic is essential.The church is always in the process of being purified, but it is not possible —on earth—because this is not heaven—for the church to be a shimmering and flawless place when in the hands of a flawed people. But those of good heart and high spiritual connection continue to protect her in God’s name.
The future is up to the males, to take a stand for decency, come what may.
Do males of this calibre even exist anymore?
Stand up MEN.
I am referencing previous threads, regarding these issues. Such as Fox Babes, Jessica Lynch, etc. You’re correct, it takes two to tango and when it comes to men and temptation, the problem doesn’t always involve a woman.
“The women are the current warriors in this fight; a burden God never intended for us to carry.”
The Woman in a Basket
Zechariah 5: 5 Then the angel who was speaking to me came forward and said to me, “Look up and see what this is that is appearing.”
6 I asked, “What is it?”
He replied, “It is a measuring basket. [b] “ And he added, “This is the iniquity [c] of the people throughout the land.”
7 Then the cover of lead was raised, and there in the basket sat a woman! 8 He said, “This is wickedness,” and he pushed her back into the basket and pushed the lead cover down over its mouth.
9 Then I looked up—and there before me were two women, with the wind in their wings! They had wings like those of a stork, and they lifted up the basket between heaven and earth.
10 “Where are they taking the basket?” I asked the angel who was speaking to me.
11 He replied, “To the country of Babylonia [d] to build a house for it. When it is ready, the basket will be set there in its place.”
Women are needed to counter certain types of evil that men aren’t as effective in dealing with without being hamhanded in the process. Other types of evil only men are capable of dealing with. All Christians of both genders are needed to work in complementary fashion on a broad front.
“The future is up to the males, to take a stand for decency, come what may. “
That mayonnaise based BBQ sauce from down in Alabama is about as indecent as it gets.
I can tell you this, Bill Clinton was elected due to the women who voted for him. Clinton received the majority of the women vote, most of whom found him “handsome” and “charming”. Even before the Monica Lewinsky incident, we knew of Bill Clinton’s propensity for harassing and sexually abusing women. Gennifer Flowers and Paula Jones were two earlier victims who came forward. But these women were branded “tramps” and “gold diggers” by the very women who should have stood up to support them. The National Organization for Women, an organization that purports to advance the cause of women was not only silent on the matter, but they actively supported Bill Clinton 100% and even actively worked to tarnish and destroy the reputations of Bill Clinton’s accusers.
Bill Clinton is not the only example in which the majority of women will throw their fellow women to the wolves in exchange for a male politician that supports their political agenda, yet treats women like dirt and like sexual objects. The Kennedys (all of them) come to mind. Need I go on?
Well, we don’t have to worry about this with good ol’ Barack Obama
Wonder why???
Billiary Clinton is not a man, he is a parasite. He is a emsucalculated male figure with no balls, no dick and has raging hormones. Obummer is the same not a male, with no balls, no dick and no backbone, in other words Obummer is like a parasite he feeds off others. Similar to Billiary Clinton. An example of a parasite is a lawyer, an orchid, or a tapeworm - sucks out the lifeblood of a man by latching onto the intestinal wall, depriving a person of the essential nutrients and minerals essential to life. hopefully this clears up why many men did not respond to a poll about Billiary Clinton. Men do not care for Billiary Clinton, nor do they care for Obummer, because both men are just like many of the feminazi’s
Bottom line. I’m very clear on the foibles of females, I get frustrated with my female friends, I’m undaunting, the conservative path is as clear as day to me.
But then my logical brain tells me females are encoded to want protection, so although their emotional reaction drives me nuts, I understand unfortunately that it translates to supporting the absurd and manipulative snake oil of Clinton and Obama that promise everything ( aka socialism).
This is why it’s so important that MALES in personal r/ships take the stand—if women knew they could depend on the man in their life to ‘be there’, they’d probably be less likely to fall for the left wing crap.
That’s it really, all these shattered r/ships, broken female-led familes, single females—the gov’t is stepping in, saying “I’ll be your man”.
MEN....STAND UP! Do you now see the connex?
And don’t think I’m not savvy to the fact that this distingration of the family unit has been ALL thought out by the left wing and how to exploit—ie, where else do people ( fems especially) have to turn but the nanny state—hence why I connect to destructive proliferation of porn, which supports attack on traditions, family and faith.
I truly believe the left WANTS males numbed and disassociated by an addiction to pornography, it’s powerful, undermining influence to the humdrum of everyday commitment to a spouse and family.
Because his wife is far more masculine than he is??
These gender based fighting threads are hard to stay away from. They are loaded with bait.
Republican women are taking lots of arrows, but they are one rung up the P.C. ladder from the men, who rank at the very bottom of things. Our Republican men aren't fighters. That is true. They play by marquis of queensbury rules. But so did Reagan.
Our system of amassing tyranny is based on political correctness, with vast arrays of disposable wealth in the ruling class, and a police state administered through corrupt, politicized judges. Our politicians are the head of the hydra, nothing more.
So somebody wants us to go sit in some jail somewhere, because they are unhappy that we aren't crusading hard enough against the hydra. Sounds brilliant.
I know you are out there and I believe that your sons will be as well and that is what we need.
I remind myself that there is nothing new under the sun. These times are hard, but others have gone through similar times and usually it is the quiet heroes, both men and women who prevail and turn it around.
It looks disgusting but really doesn't taste all that bad, lol.
But then again, I'm something of a barbecue agnostic. I love eastern NC, I love western NC almost as much, and I'm even fond of the odd transitional styles you find sometimes in between, like around Burlington. They have a hybrid coleslaw/red barbecue slaw that's actually pink. Again, disgusting to look at but tastes pretty good.
Now, South Carolina mustard mush, you can just forget that mess. Gotta draw the line somewhere and that's where I draw mine.
Herein lies the answer to the proposed problem, but in my mind, it is diametrically opposed to the statement above.
At least in Western culture (ie: Christendom), it has been the female who has always been the guardian of chastity, not the male. I believe the culprit to be feminism, and a degradation of the matriarchy generally by it's effects.
Man has always been the base sex, having both the opportunity and the compulsion to scatter his seed upon any suitable soil.
It has been (and still is) the female who sets the tone of the courtship, and the requirements with which the male must comply in order to court the lady.
When the women, seeking equality, LOWERED that expectation, they did in fact, lower themselves to a position of equality with the man, and threw away all the inherent benefits that come along with the title of "the weaker sex."
And it is a simple thing to prove: Simply stop at the door when with a man, and see what his reaction is... 99% will react by opening the door for you. These things are so ingrained in our society that they are not easily removed.
When women return to the kitchen (where they belong), then these things will be rectified.
LOL! Yes I really mean that, though I used inflammatory language precisely to get a rise:
Women need to return to the old matriarchy, which worried more about the hearth and the children, the schooling and the poor, and was not in the least concerned about being able to look a man in the eye. In fact, they could easier look a man in the eye that the feminist today, and they could get from a man what the feminist will never have. Respect.
I never see anyone refer to the electromagnetic layer of filth wrapping our planet. Yes, that's what we have, with the porn and other filth of demonic influence constantly being broadcast via electromagnetic waves wrapping our planet and being sent out into the universe.
If God had made men with the bodily facilities to see electromagnetic wave in the frequencies of the signals our technology broadcasts, the bottom of a filthy well we inhabit would be evident. Is it any wonder that God will tolerate our filthy state not much longer?>[?
If there are advanced civilizations roaming the galaxy, using knowledge of temporal and spatial warp and woof which we have yet to comprehend, then they must have some moral fabric to their behavior mechanism else they would have terminated their civilizations long before becoming galaxy spanners.
How utterly depraved we earthlings must appear to them! And ya know what, there is a class of beings who can sense this rot: Angels! And there is a where/when we do not acknowledge which is no further away than a man's arm, and Heaven only knows what our filthy realm must appear to them should they look 'over here'.
If God knows the thoughts of a man, He certainly knows the electromagnatically carried rot we've wrapped our planet in. The hallmark of our advanced technology seems to be that we've set about to image for tuned in consumption the most depraved desires of our darkened human souls, and we've wrapped our planet in a layer of electromagnetic signals carrying this filth, surrounding us 24/7/365.
Here we are a week away from a somewhat important election, and you bring THIS crap up?
Sounds like you have been spending way too much time watching teleevangelists, have run out of money to send them, and decided FR needs some moral cleansing.
Well I, for one, probably do.
But I'll go elsewhere to get it, when and IF I think it is due.
Thanks anyway.
But go away now.......please.
BS. Women are responsible for Clinton - twice and 0 once so far. As far as organized religion goes I will never participate. When it is time things will change. It will be rapid and violent.
Most of the fighting Republican men have abandoned the party. See my tagline.
Watch “Swamp People”.
Do you now see the connex?
I see conjecture, not a connection.
No, you go away, you’re another myop ignoring the elephant in the middle of the room.
You can skim over the surface all day long, but until you face the root cause pal, nothing will change.
Read my last post—about how/why women vote the way they do (imho), before you start popping off.
Of course, I say ‘probably’....this is a discussion forum, i am not presenting an exhaustively researched thesis on the topic.
However, from interactions, conversations and obervations of ‘how women think’ I feel strongly I am on track.
But more to the central point—since you reject it as ‘patently absurd’...(ahem, really?) let’s hear your counter “conjecture”.
I know what you are trying to do here. I know you are not blaming men for the sexually dehumanizing fad that is currently griping the nation. You are asking them to reject it and lead in that rejection which means saying out loud, it is not attractive nor healthy for anybody.
But many of the men here grew up under the heel of femenazis where their sexuality was essentially made criminal and their cultural love and honor for their women and children was mined by the elite as a weakness. No flirting in the workplace. No making love w/o the fear it would be called “date rape” by some kook. Sexual witch hunts against all non-socalists as it served leftist power. Abusive “progress” in family law where men were made into ATM’s and femenazi doctrines that claimed men were a burden to the family even while they worked hard to support their families. Discrimination in the work place. Dehumanizing Maoish sexual harassment re-education sessions in the work place and school. So much more destruction and hate to the love and relationship of men and women for the sake of socialists winning elections through divide and conquer was happening the 8o’s and 90’s. This sex war was all going on during Clinton’s time (remember “soccer moms”?), until Clinton ruined the game and exposed femenazis.
Finally, femenazis were no longer in power to order men around; but their legal framework of male oppression and the damage to the basic trust and honor of many men and women was already destroyed. The liberal elite then shifted into the other extreme - the final striping love making from all of it’s human inspiration and boiling it down to purely physical gratification. Every American is now protrayed as the elite’s sex objects and toys - including children. There is no love; no romance nor emotional and spiritual basis in making love recognized in the culture anymore. People are protrayed materially, like soulless animals, sexually.
What you are asking is that these men now wander back into a position of love and honor again; the place where femenazis empowered by women, moved in on them for political, sexual and legal oppression. They won’t do it. They won’t forgive women for turning against them and abusing them during the femenazi phase of divide and conquer power and for using the legal whip femenazis gave them to hurt men.
Feminists set out in the 70’s to totally destroy the social construct of the the West’s heterosexual relationship and family. They divided men from women and children from their parents. They named love hate and honor a lie.
Once men finally stood up to them and the women they led like brainless and heartless robots, (that angry male vote - it was not just white) the damage was already been done to a generation of men. When socialists realized the gig was up, they moved into the current phase of total dehumanization through homosexuality and porn and the total rejection of morality, spirit and decency. Now it is men who follow the elite’s latest phase of destruction and dehumanizaton of the women who did it to them. Women are essentially sex toys devoid of honor and love. So they have made men into ATM machines and women into sex toys.
There are exceptions to everything I have written here but this is the road we have traveled as a society and it is everybody’s fault who has permitted the elite to influnece and tear apart their ethics, lives and souls. Many conservatives did not go along with all this and fought against it. It was women like Ann Coulter who based the femenazis from power by demonstrating they don’t representing “women” as they claimed and waking women up to the destruction they were causing. Now it is time for talented men like Ann Coulter to stop the liberal elite’s current phase of dehumanizating women.
This sexual hate and the Left’s new and improved race hate divide and conquer of the post segregation era game is, centrally, why I became a conservative as a kid. I love the nature of men (there are execptions) and I love the name of women (with execptions). I don’t believe in race meaning and an order of rights nor of group guilt and group innocence or group justice, etc.
One thing, discernment. The liberal elite don’t just stop fashioning social trends of dehumanizing people. They will fashion another one that follows this current one. Another group of victims who were made pawns in the two hate games have been abandoned children so this next round will focus on their wounded nature. It will most likely be another round of man hate for “abandoning and abusing” women and children and the State’s final suspension of all parental social influence and rights.
They are going to focus on turning children against their polluting, dishoronable and oppressive parents as environmental and social informants like they have done in Britian but worse. The only people who, in the past, organized against these trends, have been Christians but look what they have done with their latest trend to debase faith’s integrity among young people in the name of new age “spirituality”, libertarianism and freedom!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.