Posted on 07/28/2010 12:44:55 PM PDT by Marty62
Judge Napolitano just reported that he has had an interview with Julian A of W@ikileaks. JA told him that he gave the docs to the White House for response two (2) weeks ago. Never receive a response.
White House approved of Security Breach? Who at the WH received the Docs and who else did they give access to the docs?
It, (as much as it pains me to think it,) seems as if we will continue to take it as long as they continue to dish it out.
I don’t see ANYONE willing to pledge their lives, their fortunes, OR their sacred honor to rid us of this cancer.
Think about it. Here we are...and the entire world is just...waiting...to see what happens next. To see what this administration will do next. Waiting.
Waiting for what??? Why? What has happened to us???
Once Afghanistan resumes it's position as the main friendly homeland for al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, Obama wants to pretend it's not his fault.
Exactly correct in my opinion. As well, contrary to some folk's wishful thinking, no one's going to be held legally accountable for this. Bank on it.
I want this SOB impeached. How many lives will be lost as a result of those leaks? How many relationships with those working WITH us have now been destroyed? We won’t hear about the impact for years but you can bet your #^@ it’s happening.
Treason,
Where will the buck stop in the Obama Junta? No hearigs you say? Hoder says, nah, don't sweat the small stuff? What does PAtreus have tio say I wonder?In the old days the CIA and MI5 in Britainn would have shut WikiLeaks down.
Its time to leave Afghanistan? Obama wants Patreus to fail as revengefor winning Iraq?
Fascism on the rise.
So this is why Obama is saying there is nothing in the papers everyone did not already know.
Not exactly correct. I was just watching Fox and they said Julian asked the White House THROUGH THE NEW YORK TIMES. He never gave the White House the documents.
He must be sweating bullets.
They knew. And not only did they know, they permitted it. THAT is the salient point here. Plausible deniability.
Thread posted recently from May 2010
National Security Strategy of the United States
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2560037/posts
I’ll watch the Judge and find out. Who was the anchor that stated this?
Barry will wave his hand and then someone we have not heard of will fall on their sword, get thrown under the bus etc. It’s like watching Star Trek back in the day. The guy wearing the red shirt always takes the fall.
Do you REALLY believe the NYT would print ANYTHING that ZERO didn’t WANT printed.
Boy are you naive. (not meant as an insult)
I just relayed what J. Hunt said on FOX at the time.
Thanks for the latest details.
How’s this?
Article 1
RESOLVED, That Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.
ARTICLE 1
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:
On July 24, 2010, and prior thereto, agents of the President committed unlawful publication of sensitive National Secret documents for the purpose of undermining national interests. Subsequent thereto, Barack Hussein Obama, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal publication, and to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities.
The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following:
. making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony;. interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
. approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful publication and other illegal activities;
. endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
. endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.
In all of this, Barack Hussein Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore Barack Hussein Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.
I was frantically searching for the J Hunt story when the Judge came on. I was wondering why and How he got the interview as some have mentioned. IMHO he is p’od about something, Fox is not exactly the Pravda of News orgs.
Julian Assange?
Reading through the thread I saw where the little twerp asked the white house by way of the times, right?
Is someone at the times calling the shots now? Has BO named someone there a *czar*?
Praying that our country can survive all that these sob’s have thrown at us.
Hi azishot!
Please see #94.
The communist losers bit more than they can chew. The American people are getting pile on and we all know when the giant awakes, he’ll not go back to sleep before ALL is well.
History support my conclusion.
If they do, it will be some mid level functionary who will get a minimal sentence and then a cushy job with some liberal organization or at an Ivy League university.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.