Posted on 05/16/2010 6:21:52 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
According to a search done by former British police detective Neil Sankey, now a U.S. citizen and a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles, Barack Obama reportedly has 27 different social security numbers under 21 different personal and/or familial name variations in 22 different states plus the District of Columbia.
Along with PI Susan Daniels, Sankey generated a large social security public data base in his lengthy research project, titled “List of Properties associated with Barack Obama and his family.”
Sankey’s research is featured in a web video entitled Dossier2MP4 produced by Jim Przybowski. The Sankey/ Daniels social security investigation segment alleges Obama currently is using a social security number of someone born in Connecticut in l890.
When asked, “How long does a social security number have to be set aside after a [death] . . when can it be used again after someone dies?” a Social Security agent named “Kathy” said “it can’t be used again. . once it’s been assigned, it can’t be used again. . .”
Sankey and Daniels report that Social Security numbers connected to Barack Obama and the addresses they trace to are as follows.
363 Notlem St., 34982-7358 Fort Pierce Florida non existent address.
A Social Security number beginning with zero is connected to “White House, Irvine, CA.”
A number starting with 282 connects to “713 Hart Senate, D.C.”
There was one connected to “White House, Baltimore, MD.”
Six more social security numbers beginning in the 400s show up with addresses in Washington, Colorado, Georgia, New Jersey, Tennessee and Maryland.
Another five beginning with 500 connect to more cities in California, Washington, Maryland, and Georgia.
Two starting with 600, trace to Florida and Texas. Of the three numbers beginning in the 700s one is listed as “Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, Utah.”
Still more….
(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...
Yep. It's pretty much common knowledge that they operate here, and on lots of conservative political forums.
Our job is to spot them and call them out.
Thank you for posting the link to this article. Extremely interesting and of course he asks the obvious question .... why are we importing more of these people???
if there was even ONE mroe Barak Hussien Obama, dont you think that person would be well known by now???
They don't realize house dangerous and destructive this behavior is for everyone. Short-sighted and ignorant.
The past three days, I’ve attempted to use the posted info and verify that Barry did use that SS# when he registered for the Selective Service .
This is the message that I have gotten all three days, when I just typed in one request per 24 hrs.
Error.
Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials.
(5/16/2010 9:37:00 PM)
Is something funky going on at the Selective Service Verification page or is it just my computer ?
Yes. We all know that politicians can't be trusted and they're always playing games, but to knowingly turn the country to someone who's goal is to destroy America can never be forgiven.
It is the very definition of treason. I'm just sick to my stomach over what Dick Cheney did at the electoral vote count.
We must look to the Founders for an antidote.
They’re playing the game with Hawaiian rules. Anyone who asked about you-know-who is automatically a vexatious requester.
Interesting read on a number of both Barack and Michelle Obama’s use of multiple SSNs also assigned to other people.
Interestingly, NONE of the SSNs were EVER issued out of Hawaii, indicating he never was a citizen of Hawaii.
Posted here on FR
Can you post a link to this version of events?
You might be right. If that was my name, I’d probably be hiding from the media or would have changed it by now.
Bookmark
My hubs was busy today (programmers find it hard to step away from the keyboard ;)), but I told him I’d like to pick his brain on the subject. I read a really good book about hacking a couple of years ago; I’ll try to find it if anyone is interested. The whole subject is almost Greek to me, but I find it a bit frightening, as well. ;)
“Strikes me as though it would be useful temp cache accounts, filtering the electronic transactions from a source account through a series of intermediaries until it reached one ultimate payout account, with intermediate draws available at any time.”
***********
OK, I didn’t understand a word of that. ;) I’ll ask Chris; maybe I’ll have him read the thread. He’s my tech translator. ;)
Iknow, !Pottery Barn! of all places. Turns out their furniture is pretty expensive. ;)
Something funny and fraud-related: We moved into a townhouse in 2004, and just left. From literally the first day I had the phone turned on we received probably _hundreds_ of fraud calls from debt collectors, lawyers, etc. For some reason our phone number was like the go-to number for people opening fraudulent accounts. One of the funny things was that the collectors never even noticed that often our area code was completely unconnected to the city and/or state listed on an account. I spent a lot of time talking to these reps and telling them that so-and-so didn’t live at our house, so they didn’t need to call us again. I do not envy those people their job. ;)
Okay, so I went back to reread what I wrote so I could understand the context of your response. I said:
“I agree that the mentions of Pennsylvania Avenue, etc., are ridiculous. I really do think they’re too childish to be much more than a stupid prank.
“....My husband is in computer tech, has been programming/legal “hacking” for about 20 years now, and he’ll say this sounds exactly like one of the stupid stunts 4Chan and groups like that pull, just to see people’s reactions. These guys are 20 or 30 with the maturity of an 11-year-old and have nothing better to do than be “subversive”. Not limited to one political party, either. Some libertarians, some Marxists, some anarchists, some apoliticals. All warped. ;(”
You said: “Hm?..Sign up is: 2010-15-14,
And...You have been on the education threads defending government schooling and government teachers.”
Okay, I think I get it, but I’m not sure. I don’t know if/why you read my very first post. I’ve been reading FR for over a year, enjoying the discussions but a little nervous to post anything because people can be a bit harsh, esp. with newbies. But I finally decided to respond to someone who was a bit disparaging about “tech coordiators” in schools. I replied that I feel they’re important because kids need computer skills. And after that, I just decided, what the hay, there are so many posts that make me think and give me questions, so I might as well start participating. ;) Definitely a n00b, but really enjoying the give-and-take so far.
I’m not sure what I said that gave you the impression I’m defending ALL government schools and ALL government teachers. I know sometimes I’m a bit sensitive about this, because as I told you I’ve known some good teachers, and we generally have enough to do in elementary school just working on language arts and math. Not a lot of time for the other subjects, including communism. ;) In a day school, you are actually *expected* to teach social studies and science, which is one reason I like it.
But in any case, I’m not sure how this relates to my comment about 4Chan and the dweebs who have the maturity level of an 11-year-old boy. Not to disparage 11-year-olds, but my private school students thought poop jokes were hilarious (not that I don’t enjoy a good poop joke now and then). Doesn’t mean they’re not smart or gifted, but they tend to find really juvenile stuff funny. As do the 20-30 year-old hacker/slackers. They love to do things to p*** people off, to get a rise out of people. I don’t think that means I don’t think there aren’t private and public school teachers doing a good job, though.
Sorry so wordy, but I’m trying really hard to be clear. Does that make any more sense?
“Good point. I’m not very adept on the computer, so if your hubby says it’s a possibility, I believe him. I do think this was done on pupose, is it to Prank, or done to make the couple of “real” fraudulent ones look like part of like a prank? It’s one or the other, I wish I knew which.”
********
From what Chris says, for these guys the difference between a “harmless” or “malicious” prank can be slight to non-existent. They like to get attention, rile people up, watch reactions. I think of them as being like the kid in “War Games” but generally more malicious. I’m not sure, but the kid who hacked into Sarah Palin’s email struck me as sort of that type — he might be one of those guys. A jacka** who needs to grow up and learn about consequences. Bleh. ;(
I know, the SS# really freaked me out. The only explanation that seemed to make sense to the police (I never really got an answer from Pottery Barn) was that the salesperson who filed the new account didn’t check everything thoroughly or something like that. Funny story — one time someone used my husband credit card info to purchase about $500 worth of tickets and stuff at the L.A. County Fair. Just that — no other spending sprees, etc. Isn’t that weird?! We kind of had to laugh about it, after it was all fixed. It made him mad, but really??? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.