Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kagan: Some speech can be 'disappeared'
wnd ^ | 5/10/10 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 05/10/2010 6:20:29 PM PDT by Nachum

NEW YORK – President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, argued certain forms of speech that promote "racial or gender inequality" could be "disappeared."

In her few academic papers, Kagan evidences strong beliefs for court intervention in speech, going so far as to posit First Amendment speech should be weighed against "societal costs.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: authoritarianism; disappeared; donttreadonme; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; gaygan; homosexualagenda; kagan; kagantruthfile; liberalfascism; localism; netneutrality; scotus; socialism; speech; totalitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
Hey, that's a nice constitution ya got there...
1 posted on 05/10/2010 6:20:29 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 05/10/2010 6:21:49 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

>>Hey, that’s a nice constitution ya got there... <<

Yep — gotta go to the can and I need something to wipe with /kagan


3 posted on 05/10/2010 6:23:30 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who rides on a scorpion should not be surprised when he last hears "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

YEAH....the “Constitution” can be “disappeared” in her and Obomba’s world....


4 posted on 05/10/2010 6:23:39 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Destroy AMERICA.....Vote DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“In a 1996 paper, “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine,” Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.”

So, what’s new?


5 posted on 05/10/2010 6:24:33 PM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Filly-bust-her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I have a friend who somehow escaped even though being on “The List” in Argentina. Why he never became one of los desaparecidos I will never know.


6 posted on 05/10/2010 6:25:44 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Kagan's academic writings are sparse – just nine articles, two of which are book reviews.

And yet she was Dean of Harvard Law School...

7 posted on 05/10/2010 6:25:52 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

She, ruth buzzie, and the wise latina will make quite the trio of old stooged maids. Our judicial system is one big joke.


8 posted on 05/10/2010 6:26:57 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Utterly unqualified Fat Pig Lesbian Kagan has major problems with that Bill of Rights thing, I see.

Obama’s new litmus test is hatred of Free Speech.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 6:27:03 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember ("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Yeah; consistent with "societal costs", like the crap they put out on Hate Crimes, "offensive to some minorities", etc., etc., and have drummed into mushy young heads about "victimhood" being a way of escaping responsibility for deviant behavior (such as herself, who cannot be morally sexually adjusted, and is a sex deviate, and expects special recognition of sexual behaviour in Law to "protect" the rights of individuals to screw goats if they want to).

Just what we need on the SCOTUS; someone intent of CORRECTING the short-comings they THINK are in the U.S. Constitution.

When the Court is finally packed to the top with these goofballs, we are screwed, and there's no place to go for relief except via musketry.

10 posted on 05/10/2010 6:27:14 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Countries that disappear speech, disappear people.


11 posted on 05/10/2010 6:27:25 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Her radicalism will slowly come out over the next few days. Rush was right today( as every other). She IS Barack Obama and Obama wouldn’t have picked her if she wasn’t. What Obama needed was an extreme radical without a paper trail to prove , and she is it.


12 posted on 05/10/2010 6:29:05 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Where they burn books they burn people.

Where they “disappear” forms of speech they “disappear” people.

The woman is a Stalinist totalitarian, just like the guy who appointed her.


13 posted on 05/10/2010 6:29:07 PM PDT by Nahanni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, argued certain forms of speech that promote "racial or gender inequality" could be "disappeared," ...going so far as to posit First Amendment speech should be weighed against "societal costs.”

Of all the frightening things a government functionary can possibly ever say, "disappeared for societal costs" has got to up around number one.


14 posted on 05/10/2010 6:32:29 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie
Kagan's academic writings are sparse – just nine articles, two of which are book reviews. And yet she was Dean of Harvard Law School...

It's the Democrat way. Obama proved that one can win an election with NO RECORD. So they don't have to screen for bad records or too much experience, just find somebody that has never done anything.

Viola!

15 posted on 05/10/2010 6:32:35 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Everyone needs valid ID except illegal aliens and the President - only in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Doesn’t matter, you already have Republicans talking about how great she is. She will get in because she is a member of a protected group and Republicans don’t have the guts to touch her.


16 posted on 05/10/2010 6:34:12 PM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

So true.


17 posted on 05/10/2010 6:37:18 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Wow. Just...wow.

Ebert, if you’re still wondering if the TPers can figure out why they wouldn’t want Elena Kagan on the Supreme Court, there’s your Exhibit A right there.


18 posted on 05/10/2010 6:37:32 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There is no justice in the land.


19 posted on 05/10/2010 6:37:35 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Cool...Judicial Inquisition means that the reeducation camps will be full in short order because society is always impacted by free thinking and the resulting speech and writings.
20 posted on 05/10/2010 6:40:24 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson