Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

“In a 1996 paper, “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine,” Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.”

So, what’s new?


5 posted on 05/10/2010 6:24:33 PM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Filly-bust-her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

This one’s worse than sotomaywhore. No matter. The pussy pubs will approve her anyway. They don’t have the cojones to bork the biotch.


81 posted on 05/11/2010 12:37:29 AM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson