Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soviet commander admits USSR came close to defeat by Nazis (banned Zhukov interview aired)
Telegraph ^ | 05/05/10

Posted on 05/05/2010 7:01:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Soviet commander admits USSR came close to defeat by Nazis

An interview in which a Soviet commander admitted how close Moscow came to defeat by Germany during the Second World War has been broadcast in Russia for the first time.

Published: 11:58AM BST 05 May 2010

The Soviet Union nearly lost the war in 1941 and suffered from poor planning, according to Marshal Georgy Zhukov in the frank television interview that has been banned since it was recorded in 1966.

Zhukov, the most decorated general in the history of both Russia and the Soviet Union, admitted that Soviet generals were not confident that they could hold the German forces at the Mozhaisk defence line outside Moscow.

"Did the commanders have confidence we would hold that line of defence and be able to halt the enemy? I have to say frankly that we did not have complete certainty.

"It would have been possible to contain the initial units of the opponent but if he quickly sent in his main group, he would have been difficult to stop," he told the interviewer, the Soviet writer Konstantin Simonov.

Zhukov also revealed details of his exchanges with Joseph Stalin, the wartime leader, in the interview broadcast on state-run Channel One.

In giving the reasons for the Soviet victory, Zhukov made no mention of Stalin, who was taken unawares by the Nazi invasion of Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: dithf; germans; godsgravesglyphs; history; nazi; soviets; stalin; ww2; wwii; zhukov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; SunkenCiv; Homer_J_Simpson

interesting!


41 posted on 05/05/2010 7:46:51 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

Add Lend Lease. 750000 military transport vehicles,8000 Sherman tanks, 25000 locomotives,100 octane aviation gas,1000s of A20 attack planes ,P39s,P40s Hawker Hurricanes,diesel fuel, and the list goes on. No soft skin transport and the great Russian advances lose momentum and bog down. T34s sans accopnyiing infantry are targets for 88s and panzerfausts.No deuce and a halfs, no accompanying troops. If Soviet industry has to make up the motor transport, then fewer T34s are built. Without Lend Lease there are no dramatic Soviet offensives and the war stalemates in the East.


42 posted on 05/05/2010 7:47:40 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Never compromise with evil! Even in the face of Armageddon!! Rorshach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
If Hitler had beaten Stalin then we beat Hitler we would not be havng such a communist problem right here now.

We would own the world!! lol

43 posted on 05/05/2010 7:49:53 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
What!You suggest another measly 50 or 60 divisions might have turned D-Day into the worst debacle and bloodbath of history?

Actually,some people need to recognize that the American army fought only a small portion of the German army,and our men ,were not supermen either.

I concur with the poster that IF Hitler's army had defeated the Soviets the world would be a very different place today.

Ultimately it was Hitler's insanity that lost the war for the Germans:Hitler exterminated millions of loyal,or at worst indifferent polically,Jews who could have contributed mightily to an "ordinary" war effort,he failed to utilize the strong dislike of the Czechs,Ukrainians, and others and turned down the certainty of another 500,000 or more soldiers fighting against Red Russia...in all Hitler was NOT a brilliant leader,just a vicious demagogue bent on destroying those who didn't worship him.

44 posted on 05/05/2010 7:52:42 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I don’t think your analogy holds up at all. The allies were essentially exhausted by the time of the Bolshevik coup in November 1917, and yet with the addition of the doughboys in 1917, the allies were able to turn back the desparate gamble, and last ditch effort of General Ludendorf. Yes, we defeated the vaunted German army, even with the collapse of the eastern front precipatated by Lenin’s strategic surrender at Brest-Litovsk.

As for the Germans hooking up with the Japanese, a lot of good it would have done, since the Germans were essentially bled dry by the Russian red army, and would have surely faced unrelentless guerilla warfare from the partisans from the Urals to Vladivostock. And don’t worry about the Japanese, my father’s boys and the rest of the heroic American Navy, Marines, and Army service men in the Pacific theatre would have taken care of Japan, whether Hitler was able to resupply them or not.


45 posted on 05/05/2010 7:54:10 AM PDT by AdvisorB (Obamatude could be defined by Blago as something tangible, but not quite as tangible as JJJ's offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Good thing Hitler ordered his forces to turn away from Moscow and head to Stalingrad

That worked out well. lol.

46 posted on 05/05/2010 7:54:25 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: caver
I believe this was already known. Stalin’s purges of the
military was what hurt the Soviet Union. Stalin is the one that
almost lost the war.


That is my (very inexpert) understanding.
I remember being aghast at a documentary about Stalin's pre-WWII
purge of the Soviet officer corps. (or corpse, so Obama can understand
if he's lurking!).

I hope I don't mis-remember too significantly, but I think the
documentary claimed that no army, in war or peace, suffered as
great a loss of officers as the Soviet military thanks to Stalin.

Additionally, my understanding is that when outlaying Soviet military
units called Moscow with desparate reports that they were being
attacked by German/Nazi forces; Moscow replied "you must be
out of your minds!".

Stalin did all he could to lose that war!
47 posted on 05/05/2010 7:56:08 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Napoleon captured Moscow in 1812. Of course conditions of war were much different at that time.

The Germans were taken by surprise by the onset of the Russian winter in 1941. Plus Hitler's refusal to let them retreat from Stalingrad (winter 1942/43) was a major error.

48 posted on 05/05/2010 7:57:30 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VOA

That’s what I remember too.


49 posted on 05/05/2010 7:57:40 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AdvisorB

I hope that Freep LS is lurking and will weigh in on this.


50 posted on 05/05/2010 7:59:38 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Wonder if Deep in the Hurtgen Forest will show up?


51 posted on 05/05/2010 8:03:31 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

God directly intervened by providing two of the most brutal winters in history, even by Russian standards.


52 posted on 05/05/2010 8:06:57 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Lend-Lease as a Function of the Soviet War Economy. There are also other good stats on that site.
53 posted on 05/05/2010 8:13:21 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet; LS

I would enjoy the good Professor’s take on the subject. It would certainly enhance the debate. Currently, I’m reading his “Patriotic History of the United States,” and I can’t put it down. Professor Schweikart has a great chapter on “Democracy’s Finest Hour 1941 to 1945,” and within this chapter there’s a subchapter entitled “Putting the Ax to the Axis.”


54 posted on 05/05/2010 8:13:42 AM PDT by AdvisorB (Obamatude could be defined by Blago as something tangible, but not quite as tangible as JJJ's offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I am not so sure about that claim;if so then why did not God intervene directly by having Hitler and his top advisors all die of food poisoning at some conference ,or plane crash or one of the many assasination attempts succeed?You know Hitler claimed God protected or spared him from about a dozen attempts.

You can't have free will and God constantly stepping in to correct the mistakes at the same time;you can have a God who gave us the rules and commands us to do good yet gave us the free will to do good or ill,and who will judge the results in the end.

55 posted on 05/05/2010 8:16:11 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
God directly intervened by providing two of the most brutal winters in history, even by Russian standards.

Did God intervene with Katrina?

56 posted on 05/05/2010 8:18:38 AM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Cool Site!


57 posted on 05/05/2010 8:23:05 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (RAT Hunting Season started the evening of March 21st, 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I was thinking the very same thing; the industrial base was still far to the east so I'm not sure Moscow was the end-all be-all of the war. In addition, the Siberian reinforcements that stopped the advance the winter of ‘41 were already well on there way regardless of the condition of Moscow. So, the counterattack would have started slightly east of where it happened historically; same result more than likely. Also simply reaching Moscow, and taking Moscow are two very different things. I imagine that attempting to capture Moscow would have ended up much like Stalingrad ended for the Germans later in the war where almost all of the city was under German occupation but ultimately was lost due to overwhelming reinforcements surrounding the battle area. This would have been the situation in the winter/spring of ‘42 had Moscow been occupied. its an interesting discussion to be sure.
58 posted on 05/05/2010 8:30:29 AM PDT by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Add Lend Lease. 750000 military transport vehicles,8000 Sherman tanks, 25000 locomotives,100 octane aviation gas,1000s of A20 attack planes ,P39s,P40s Hawker Hurricanes,diesel fuel, and the list goes on. No soft skin transport and the great Russian advances lose momentum and bog down. T34s sans accopnyiing infantry are targets for 88s and panzerfausts.No deuce and a halfs, no accompanying troops. If Soviet industry has to make up the motor transport, then fewer T34s are built. Without Lend Lease there are no dramatic Soviet offensives and the war stalemates in the East.

great point...the T-34 gets all the glore but it was our motor-t (and other) that kept there army moving


59 posted on 05/05/2010 8:30:29 AM PDT by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

That makes H’s opening up the Western Front so bizarre to me. I guess it could not be avoided following the invasion of Poland considering the treaties then in force. If I recall correctly, even the German high command was surprised France folded like a cheap suit. Seems to me like such a crazy gamble.


60 posted on 05/05/2010 8:31:50 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson