Posted on 03/01/2010 7:46:57 AM PST by HDCochran
Barack Obama plans 'dramatic reductions' in US nuclear weapons stockpile. Headline only.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
0bozo the boy commie pig usurper, lurches from one debacle of his own choosing to another. His strategy is to assult America with so many directions to destroy & tear down our country, that eventually just a few of his boneheaded ideas will hit somewhere. What a commie pig traitor he is....
You are aware how much of the world we are trying to deter and how many warheads are aimed at us, right?
WW2 it was easy to pick 2 targets- try narrowing your target list in this world- in a multi theater, multi front war - and then project to 20 years from now since that is what today's decisions affect.
Or maybe you agree with the brilliant obama Harvard academic strategic thinkers who think the world will be a less dangerous place 20 years from now, with sane logical leaders in full control of their own WMD, if the US halves its deterrence?
If we have 2800 warheads now, it's not because of the bellicosity of our past presidents and Pentagon, but because of the threat(s) we face and the prudent planning decisions they made to posture us to deter an attack, or to defend us if one begins.
this fixation on reducing US nukes- UNLITERALLY- is simply Barry carrying out his thesis he wrote as a goofy illiterate affirmative action college senior.
Check it out. Maybe he got better grades in military strategery than he did in Economics. We can only hope.
Didn't Gaddafi give lots of money to Farrakhan's group?
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Wpngall.html
The Hiroshima bomb was 13 kilotons, the Nagasaki bomb was 21 kilotons.
We can afford to reduce some of our nuclear weaponry.
Spreading the wealth, nuclear style.
Sigh....
Tell me about it...nothing about this psycho and his minions is a joke.
As long as this coincides with advancements in a modernized nucelar arsenal, including possibly smaller, more tactical versions, but an all-round more modern and effective arsenal then I’m for it...of course the likelihood of that is nil.
I can’t wait for November, when it’ll be:
US plans ‘dramatic reductions’ in government!
Why don’t you just give them to Iran, Hussein
You don’t do that unilaterally, you negotiate a 3 way deal with China and Russia to scrap their unwanted devices too.
This policy is more Dem Bullsh1t.
One advantage to having a larger number is that even if a traitor gives an enemy the means to conduct an effective surprise attack on 90% of our strike capability, we'd still have enough left to strike back with that our enemies would be unwilling to take such a chance. If we reduce our strength too much, or eliminate too much of its diversity, an enemy might realistically hope to knock us out completely before we could respond. Having an enemy attempt such a thing would be disastrous, regardless of whether it was successful.
I just checked. Farrakhan received about 1 BILLION dollars from Gaddafi, in part to help Clinton get re-elected (via the minority vote).
FEDS PROBE FARRAKHAN-LIBYA TIE
By Richard Sisk
February 17th 1996
WASHINGTON The Justice Department yesterday fired off a letter to Louis Farrakhan calling for an accounting of the reported $1 billion deal the Nation of Islam leader made with Libyan dictator Moammar Khadafy.
Justice officials said they were seeking to determine "whether a violation of federal law occurred" during Farrakhan's tour of Africa and the Mideast, which has included meetings with Khadafy, Iraq's Saddam Hussein and the rulers of Iran.
According to the government-controlled Libyan media, Khadafy pledged $1 billion to Farrakhan's group, partly to help turn out the minority vote in the November elections.
If true, Farrakhan could have violated federal law by failing to register with the Justice Department as the agent of a foreign government seeking to influence American policies or politics.
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1996/02/17/1996-02-17_feds_probe_farrakhan-libya_t.html
I was thinking the same thing this morning. Obama's 90 million to schools if they fire principals and close down schools and open up Charters. I thought if we trusted him that is a good thing. But with Obama he will clear out conservatives and bring in liberal only principals and close down all the wrong schools just like he did car dealerships.
He has proven he is not to be trusted.
Luckily, I was in between sips of scotch when I saw that- else my sinuses would’ve been on fire.
“As an act of spreading the wealth, is he gonna give all of ours to North Korea and Iraq?”
Of course not, silly. He going to spread them around in various muslim countries - to make them all equal, except Saudia Arabia which will be more equal than others...
Heh
Excellent posts on this thread, ETL. From his Harvard writings to present. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.