Dinosaur Soft Tissue Finally Makes News

ICR News ^ | December 2, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

[GodGunsGuts]

Although creation-based organizations have reported for over a decade on the technical scientific journal articles published about soft tissue found inside dinosaur remains, mainstream media outlets have largely been silent on the subject. But a recent segment that aired on CBS’s 60 Minutes finally broke the news to a broader audience. The soft tissue issue may be gaining more traction, and even “may be changing the whole dino ballgame,” according to correspondent Lesley Stahl.[1]

The program is currently viewable online at the CBS website. In a field test demonstration to determine whether a dinosaur fossil was real bone, and not bone replaced by minerals, Stahl touched her tongue to it...

[metmom]

Perhaps it will mean that everything we know about radioactive decay, geology, cosmology, anthropology, time, and biology needs major revision.

You anti-science HERETIC, you!!!!!

(Just didn't want you to feel neglected...)

[editor-surveyor]

"How do you think she got her job?"

Leslie was a real 'looker' once upon a time...

[editor-surveyor]

Excellent sarcasm!

[humblegunner]

Dinosaur Soft Tissue Finally Makes News

I can't see it replacing Kleenex.

They need better marketing people.

[xcamel]

"For the record, this post BS is being posted in News/Activism for the express purpose of personal self edification of a militant creationist"

[null and void]

;^P

[GodGunsGuts]

Let's face it, this was a spectacular find that should have been all over the MSM (esp. on the broadcast news), but instead the evos (and their MSM allies) tried to keep a lid on the find while they did their best to discredit it. Unfortunately for them, there have been numerous similar finds since then. And they didn't just find bone matrix, they found blood vessels, blood cells, and various other soft-tissue. If memory serves, they even stank like decaying flesh inside. These soft-tissue finds in animals that were thought by the Temple of Darwin to be between 65-80 mya directly contradict both what is known about the rate of soft-tissue decompostion --and-- the long-age evolutionary timeline.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

G3, although we completely disagree on the age of the Earth, I saw this show when it aired, and knew you’d be interested. Meant to ping you the next morning, but got involved at work, and forgot. Sorry!

[null and void]

Leslie was a real 'looker' once upon a time...

Agreed. She had the best looking top of a head for her day...

*nully ducking and running for cover*

[editor-surveyor]

"Well, except the whole issue of coordinated fraud, no evidence and a massive socialist political machine that pushed the creation and acceptance of AGW from the beginning."

A perfect match so far...

"Natural Selection started as an underdog and grew on its own scientific merits despite claims of heresy within a highly religious environment."

And the most ridiculous statement of the day, at the least! (fraud has scientific merit?)

[metmom]

I knew I could count on one evo to come through.

[GodGunsGuts]

Yeah, right...LOL!

PS Last I checked...virtually all the global warming nazis masquerading as scientists have made the universe their god, worship at the alter of mother earth, and view darwin as its messenger.

[xcamel]

“I knew I could count”

Most of us had serious doubts.

[urroner]

GGG said: “AGW nazis ain’t got nothin’ on the Temple of Darwin fanatics.”

I guess you’ve never had to deal with the “Temple of Young Earther and Other People Who Damn All Who Believe Differently To Hell Even Before Those Others Come Before the Judgment Seat of Christ.” I have no idea why these people are so willing to push Christ of his Judgment Seat so they can put their fat butts into it. Maybe somebody can tell me why.

[stormer]

I remember that too. Horner related an exchange he'd had with a colleague:

“These fossils stink” said the colleague.
“Hell Creek fossils ALWAYS stink” Horner replied.

He went on to explain how stupid he felt for not asking the question “why?”.

[GodGunsGuts]

No problem. It was very nice of you to think of me :o)

[GodGunsGuts]

I don't know of a single major Creationist organization that believes that a belief in biblical creation is necessary for salvation. They believe it is important to church doctrine, they believe that stretching the biblical account of creation to accommodate evolution compromises God's Word, but they don't believe it keeps you out of Heaven, nor do they believe it damns you to Hell.

[editor-surveyor]

You got no place to hide!

[editor-surveyor]

"I don't know of a single major Creationist organization that believes that a belief in biblical creation is necessary for salvation."

I tend to think that statement turns cause and effect upsidedown ;o)

[urroner]

I guess either you don’t know many Creationist or you don’t know those who have damned me to Hell several times.