Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IT'S NOT OVER - COULD HOFFMAN WIN? Recanvassing shows NY-23 race tightens even as Rep.
Syracuse ^ | 11/12/09 | Mark Weiner / The Post-Standard

Posted on 11/12/2009 2:09:01 PM PST by American Dream 246

Democrat Bill Owens delivers his victory speech at his headquarters in Plattsburgh last week. Owens declared victory after Conservative nominee Doug Hoffman conceded the 23rd Congressional District race election night. Now recanvassing shows the special election has narrowed to a 3,000-vote difference, and will be decided by a count of absentee ballots.

The Associated PressDemocrat Bill Owens delivers his victory speech at his headquarters in Plattsburgh last week. Owens declared victory after Conservative nominee Doug Hoffman conceded the 23rd Congressional District race election night. Now recanvassing shows the special election has narrowed to a 3,000-vote difference, and will be decided by a count of absentee ballots.» Updated county-by-county NY-23 vote totals (PDF)Washington -- Conservative Doug Hoffman conceded the race in the 23rd Congressional District last week after receiving two pieces of grim news for his campaign: He was down 5,335 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted on election night, and he had barely won his stronghold in Oswego County.

As it turns out, neither was true.

But Hoffman’s concession -- based on snafus in Oswego County and elsewhere that left his vote undercounted -- set off a chain of events that echoed all the way to Washington, D.C., and helped secure passage of a historic health care reform bill.

Democratic Rep. Bill Owens was quickly sworn into office on Friday, a day before the rare weekend vote in the House of Representatives. His support sealed his party’s narrow victory on the health care legislation.

Now a recanvassing in the 11-county district shows that Owens’ lead has narrowed to 3,026 votes over Hoffman, 66,698 to 63,672, according to the latest unofficial results from the state Board of Elections.

In Oswego County, where Hoffman was reported to lead by only 500 votes with 93 percent of the vote counted election night, inspectors found Hoffman actually won by 1,748 votes -- 12,748 to 11,000.

The new vote totals mean the race will be decided by absentee ballots, of which about 10,200 were distributed, said John Conklin, communications director for the state Board of Elections.

Under a new law in New York that extended deadlines, military and overseas ballots received by this coming Monday (and postmarked by Nov. 2) will be counted. Standard absentee ballots had to be returned this past Monday.

Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District, and therefore the state had not certified the election. But the letter noted that Owens still led by about 3,000 votes, and that the special election was not contested -- two factors that legally allowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to swear in Owens on Friday.

"We sent a letter to the clerk laying out the totals," Conklin said. "The key is that Hoffman conceded, which means the race is not contested. However, all ballots will be counted, and if the result changes, Owens will have to be removed."

Before Owens was sworn in Friday, Rep. John Garamendi, a Democrat who won a special election in California, was sworn in Thursday. The two gave Pelosi the votes she needed to reach a majority of 218 and pass the historic health care reform legislation in the House.

The bill passed 220-215 late Saturday with the support of only one Republican. The Republican, Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao of Louisiana, said he voted for the legislation only after seeing that Democrats had the 218 votes needed for passage.

Now Hoffman, who campaigned against the health care reform bill, is carefully watching as the 23rd District race tightens and he is left to wonder if he conceded too soon.

"I don’t know if we would have conceded on election night," Rob Ryan, Hoffman’s campaign spokesman, said Wednesday while discussing the latest results of the recanvassing. "I’m someone who doesn’t like to look back. But would we have taken longer to make a decision on election night? Probably, if we knew it was only 3,000 votes making the difference."

Ryan, while acknowledging that Hoffman’s chances of pulling off a come-from-behind victory are still remote, said the campaign is looking at its legal options.

"We’re basically watching and waiting," Ryan said. "We’ve been looking very closely at the recanvass. We’re going to see how this week shapes up, and then we’re going to determine what to do."

Ryan said an important factor in the decision to concede was the unexpected -- and erroneous -- close vote in Oswego County, where polls had Hoffman with a double digit percentage point lead heading into Election Day.

"That’s the thing that threw us off," Ryan said.

Oswego County elections officials blame the mistakes on "chaos" in their call-in center that included a phone system foul-up and inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results. Of 245 races in the county -- not including the congressional and court races -- 84 had incorrect totals reported election night.

In the congressional race, more votes were cast in Oswego County than any other in the 11-county district.

The district’s second biggest voter turnout was in Jefferson County, where Hoffman also has benefited from a turnaround since election night, gaining about 700 votes. Owens led Hoffman by 300 votes on the final election night tally. But after recanvassing, Hoffman now leads by 424 votes, 10,884 to 10,460.

Jerry Eaton, the Republican elections commissioner for Jefferson County, said inspectors found a problem in four districts where Hoffman’s vote total was mistakenly entered as zero.

"Hoffman definitely gained votes where he didn’t have them," Eaton said.

Jefferson County, home of Fort Drum and the Army's 10th Mountain Division, distributed 2,299 absentee ballots for the special election. As of this week, 1,303 had been returned but not counted, Eaton said. He said the county will begin counting the absentee ballots earyl next week.

Conklin, of the state Board of Elections, said officials did not have updated absentee ballot totals from the other counties.

When asked about the tightening race, Owens spokesman Jon Boughtin released a statement without directly addressing the election. "Since being elected, Congressman Owens has remained focused on the issues at hand: working with local leaders to address the Champlain Bridge closure, meeting with commanders at Fort Drum and continuing the work to strengthen Upstate New York," the statement said.

Ryan said the absentee ballots are likely to favor Hoffman because most were likely mailed before Republican Dede Scozzafava suspended her campaign three days before the election.

"For Doug to win, we needed a three-way race," Ryan said, adding that the campaign’s internal polls showed Hoffman would win with all three candidates.

"Given the majority of these ballots are from a three-way race, we think the ballots are going to break Doug’s way," Ryan said.

Ryan declined to say what percentage of the absentee vote the campaign believes Hoffman would need to win the race. Nevertheless, Hoffman’s campaign is optimistic.

"When people look back at this race, it was a remote possibility that Doug Hoffman would be a contender," Ryan said. "But miracles do happen.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 111th; bush; duncanhunter; education; elections; government; healthcare; hoffman; hunter; military; notbreakingnews; ny2009; ny23; obama; obamacare; palin; politics; presidentbush; publiceducation; sarahpalin; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last
To: OldDeckHand

I don’t know if Scuzzy would have won without Hoffman in the race, but even if she would have, it would have been bad for Republicans.
++++++++++++++++

Exactly. This is the whole point and why it was a victory for her not to win and we’re still talking about Hoffman having a shot at that seat TODAY.

Maybe a slim one, but you have to hand that to him.


161 posted on 11/12/2009 5:52:55 PM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: soycd
I can only presume that when they looked at the number's and they do, what is outstanding, what is in and Hoffman's team chose to concede withOUT all the information and now it seem’s he was wrong to do so.

Had he followed what was allowed under the law, to wait until the votes were in, Owens wouldn't have been sworn in and HC might not have passed. I am sure a lot of looking back.

I am sure you read my frustration in post 8, even now the more I think about voter's disenfranchised, in particular, our military who need to plan in advance, they did not have the same choices as boot's on the ground in NY, I just think that goes against all we believe in when it comes an open and honest democratic system.

162 posted on 11/12/2009 5:59:13 PM PST by Former Military Chick (Please pray for our troops as they selflessly serve in harm's way say an extra one for my beloved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Had he followed what was allowed under the law, to wait until the votes were in, Owens wouldn’t have been sworn in and HC might not have passed.

$$$$$

Don’t kid yourself. Ms Pelosi would not have called the vote without her 218 ayes. Every dem who voted no was given permission to do so from her horribleness.


163 posted on 11/12/2009 6:05:04 PM PST by maica (Freedom consists not in doing what we like,but in having the right to do what we ought. John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Totally agree. Hoffman wasn’t much of a factor prior to about 2-3 weeks before the election, plus military members overseas don’t have access to talk radio and FOX news where the issue really got traction.

Combine that with the deadlines for mailing and I agree Scuzzy will get the majority of the votes because of the ersatz (R) behind her name!


164 posted on 11/12/2009 6:19:15 PM PST by GatorGirl (Eschew Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

There is no way a third party nominee will get the majority of absentee votes.

So Hoffman was right to concede.


165 posted on 11/12/2009 6:27:47 PM PST by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

A seat does not have to be filled if no one is deemed qualified for it by the House or the Senate. In post 70, OldDeckHand pointed out that a lawsuit could be brought by the elected official, so it behooves the House and Senate to have an extremely good reason to deprive the citizens of representation. Such a decision apparently goes to a committee for inquiry and then to the floor for a vote, so it’s not strictly up to the Speaker of the Majority Leader.

Victor L. Berger (early 1900s’ Wisconsin socialist/anti-war politician, charged with espionage, but his constituents didn’t care) was denied the seat he won in back-to-back elections. The House decided to leave the seat vacant until the next election. Several years later, after the charges were dropped, he won again and was seated.

NY-23 is a fill-in election and the House could refuse to seat Hoffman, particularly since Democrats have the majority. Elections cost money, after all. At least, Owens would be out...I hope.


166 posted on 11/12/2009 6:52:48 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: skr

“Several years later, after the charges were dropped, he won again and was seated.”

Isn’t it nice in the old days, even the question of guilt counted for something, and even the politicos acted on it and ostracized the subject, to avoid any appearance of unseemly taint to the whole.

Nowadays, even in private groups like the NFL, it’s always this milquetoast/cop-out “he hasn’t been convicted of anything”, before they’ll consider possibly removing the questionable from action.


167 posted on 11/12/2009 7:01:53 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I should’ve said the House, not just Pelosi. The House has denied seats on more than one occasion, but perhaps you just mean under this Congress?


168 posted on 11/12/2009 7:05:24 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: soycd
Par for the coarse from the democrats.

Dissolve the Union Now!

America you have been sold out to foreign powers!
169 posted on 11/12/2009 7:14:27 PM PST by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The article said Owens would be removed if Hoffman actually won.


170 posted on 11/12/2009 7:24:02 PM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246; 1000 silverlings; xzins; blue-duncan
Of 245 races in the county -- not including the congressional and court races -- 84 had incorrect totals reported election night.

The New Math in old style Chicago politics.

171 posted on 11/12/2009 7:52:57 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246
Don't worry. Commucrats will “find” an extra ballot box or two-just enough to put them over the top.
172 posted on 11/12/2009 8:34:26 PM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

i took the comment to be that the rat counters will ‘screw’ with the ballots...


173 posted on 11/12/2009 8:35:36 PM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force... Like fire, a dangerous servant & master. GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Fear not, Hoffman winning means nothing because he is not the Democrat.

Such an event only counts if the electoral reversal goes to the Democrat.

The USA no longer does honest elections, being electorally a corrupt, 3rd World nation moving yet faster thus courtesy President “Chavez” Obama and the Neo-Fascist Party (formerly the “Democratic Party” but truth in advertising mandated the name change...and to be bipartisan, the Republican Party is now the “We Be Idiots” Party, in view it the lack of leadership and spine.


174 posted on 11/12/2009 8:51:39 PM PST by OldArmy52 (The German High Command sent Lenin to destabilize Russia. Who sent Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
This is why close races shouldn’t be conceded until the recount at least.

Yep.

175 posted on 11/12/2009 9:11:24 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; Kansas58
Hoffman did a FANTASTIC job, for a 3rd Party candidate. Of handing the seat to the Democrats.

Having a liberal Republican would've done more harm than good. Pelosi would've had TWO republican votes on her health care fiasco, to call it a bipartisan bill.
176 posted on 11/12/2009 9:20:26 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I posted, on this site, on election night, that there was no way Hoffman only won Oswego county by 500 votes. I also said I hated the new optical scan voting machines and that there would be problems. This may sound rude and insulting to some, but the fact of the matter is that many of the people that work some of the local elections around here are clueless and borderline,shall I say, “special”. A guy that signed me in to vote had trouble with the lever machines when we had those. Now he's totally in over his head, but he's there to help run the election... and a democrat... and is available to work on election day because he was fired from a convenience store job because he couldn't count money... I kid you not.

That being said, absentee votes usually follow the same pattern as the votes cast on election night, but who knows with all of these irregularities? When most of them were mailed in it was a 3 way race. I do know Hoffman will pick up 4 votes from senior citizens in my family that voted absentee.

I also find it strange that NY doesn't count absentee's until at least a week after the election and doesn't certify any election until after that, yet they swore Owens in so quickly. You can't even sit on a town board in a town of 1000 people total around here until the vote in your election is certified.

Maybe, just maybe,(wouldn't it be great?) that Owens was sworn in so soon not just for his health care vote, but to muddy the waters when we find out he really didn't win. (I can dream can't I?)

177 posted on 11/12/2009 9:26:04 PM PST by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

I don’t understand how Hoffman can win after he conceded.
Even if he did win the vote... he bowed out of the race.
he shouldn’t have conceded.


178 posted on 11/12/2009 9:29:31 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Scamozza and Hoffman were splitting the Republican vote—what is so hard to understand about that? With all the circuslike aspects of this race—Scamozze still on the ballot after she dropped out, the absentee ballots having been cast before all the shenanigans started, the in-and-out and candidate switching (but only partially) by the RNC—you cannot fairly say he didn’t represent his district.


179 posted on 11/12/2009 9:36:06 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: livius
Of course, then I think back on how the anti-immigration lobby here on FR destroyed a lot of conservative candidates who weren’t perfectly in line with their anti-Mexican obssession - and landed us with McCain, selected by the RNC that didn’t care one way or the other and simply felt that John deserved his turn.

Learn to work with people who at least agree on major principles - and I think Hoffman does, although I’m not 100% in agreement, either - or you’ll end up part of the circular firing squad that has left us with nothing but loser RINO candidates.


Of course - playing the race card. 'Illegal Alien' is not a race. Conservative candidates are not pro-amnesty, it's the RINOs that brought about their own demise by voting for and pushing amnesty - against the base's will. Enforcing existing laws IS a major principle - not rewarding law-breakers who come here with no respect for what they get here, just looking for more free handouts. It's like saying I'm conservative except that I'm for higher taxes. If someone is for amnesty, they are likely not conservative or are getting money off of hiring illegals and put that above principle. And therefore, not conservative.
180 posted on 11/12/2009 9:38:54 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson