Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carrie Prejean: ‘I was not having sex’ in video
msnbc.com ^ | 11/10/09 | Mike Celizic

Posted on 11/10/2009 9:10:29 AM PST by VAFreedom

Carrie Prejean on Tuesday defended a recently surfaced erotic video of her as a youthful indiscretion and questioned whether it could actually be called a “sex tape” since no one else appears in it.

Prejean admitted to making the video of herself and sending it to her boyfriend when she was 17 years old.

(Excerpt) Read more at today.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: blackmail; carrieprejean; childporn; extortion; gaystapotactics; homosexualagenda; itsjustsex; jailbait; lavendermafia; masturbation; misscalifornia; missusa; pornification; prejean; samesexmarriage; sexting; tmz; underage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: OCCASparky

“Sorry Carrie, but it involves sexual activity, and therefore by definition is a sex tape. Doesn’t matter if nobody else was in the video with you.”

How do you know that? Carrie says there was no sex on the tape. So, how do you come to say there was sexual activity on the tape? Have you seen the tape yourself? Were you there when she made the video?


141 posted on 11/10/2009 2:17:03 PM PST by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

What part of “she admitted it” confuses you? And since when is masturbation not sexual?


142 posted on 11/10/2009 2:25:48 PM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
The boyfriend that sold the tape, guilty of selling child porn?
Pagent officials guilty of possessing child porn?

The problem is that if it can be classified as child porn, then by making the video and giving it to her boyfriend she could be charged with producing and distributing child porn.

143 posted on 11/10/2009 2:27:18 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Should she be charged as an adult, if so, is she guilty of child porn?


144 posted on 11/10/2009 2:53:54 PM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky; jessduntno
"I would definitely have to examine the tape before making a judgment..."

"Yes, frame, by frame, by frame. Several times."

Hmmm! Just to be really fair, I would insist that she give live reenactment so that we could be sure there was no chance of photoshoping or video editing...

145 posted on 11/10/2009 3:38:00 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

If one of those girls later becomes an attorney and runs for political office, she, too, will painfully discover the truth of the Boortz axiom.


146 posted on 11/10/2009 4:35:55 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP
Except she was a minor at the time. So she gos to jail till she is 18. But since she is over 18 now it makes no difference and her record is wiped clean.

So she says. Everyone seems to assume that she is telling the truth when she says she was 17 at the time.

Pageant participants are required to sign a contract assuring the pageant that they've never posed nude before they participate. As we all know, she did pose nude before the pageant. And she first claimed that those pictures were taken when she was 17, though others disagree:

Although Prejean said the pictures were taken when she was 17, others have alleged that they seem to have been taken after she underwent breast-enhancement surgery six weeks prior to the Miss USA pageant. That surgery was paid for by the Miss California pageant. Miss California: I’ll fight on despite racy photos (^) May 12, 2009

It certainly is convenient, isn't it, that, just as with the nude pictures, she claims to have been underage when she video taped herself? Because if she was underage, it can't be distributed...

If she was underage, then of course this video shouldn't be distributed. But I'm not sure we should automatically take her at her word.

Fool me once, shame on you...

147 posted on 11/10/2009 10:09:51 PM PST by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this huckster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

And just as many stupid young girls who fall for them.


148 posted on 11/10/2009 10:12:39 PM PST by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: hsrazorback1
Actress Vanessa Hudgens learned that innappropriate photos can end up in places you never intended them to. (CBS)<<<=== WARNING: Do NOT click on photo!

Actress Vanessa Hudgens learned that innappropriate photos can end up in places you never intended them to. (CBS)
149 posted on 11/10/2009 11:11:06 PM PST by Brown Deer (4 Google execs are on Obama's staff - YouTube is owned by Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DryFly

so true


150 posted on 11/10/2009 11:23:42 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (I will die on my feet before I live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

LOL...dont click on photo.....yeah right...

*CLICK*


151 posted on 11/10/2009 11:24:28 PM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

She states that there was no sex, you are getting confused by the propagandic writing.


152 posted on 11/11/2009 12:07:01 AM PST by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

You mean like when Clinton claimed he and Monica weren’t having sex?


153 posted on 11/11/2009 3:31:13 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

Are we talking about sex as it was defined pre-Clinton or post-Clinton?


154 posted on 11/11/2009 3:40:59 AM PST by Fresh Wind ("Prosperity is just around the corner." VP Charles Curtis, 1932)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

I think this is more like the LaCrosse team saying they didn’t have sex...so you still haven’t answered the question to your stupid statements...how do you know there was sex in the video? Did you see the video? Were you there when the video was made? If not, STFU and go back under your rock until the next conservative comes along for you to hurt. I will be waiting...


155 posted on 11/11/2009 6:52:45 AM PST by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

I get it. You’re being obtuse, but you call ME stupid? So tell me, is someone masturbating on a tape sexual in nature, or not?


156 posted on 11/11/2009 7:03:52 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

It so wrong how she is being treated. The hell she must be going through. Teenagers do all kinds of stupid, immature things. This is so dirty. She doesn’t deserve this, she had every right to tell what was in her heart. People are so twisted. She is a perfectly decent person and she had every right to answer the question, was she supposed to lie? Sick!


157 posted on 11/11/2009 11:30:53 AM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
was she supposed to lie

The more I think about various news stories these days,
the more I see the common theme - yes, we are supposed to lie (Political Correctness).

The "god of this world" insists on it.

158 posted on 11/11/2009 11:33:44 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

She states there is no sex on the tape, you say she is masturbating...did you see the video? Were you there? I call you stupid because you have yet to answer the simple question, yet you continue to bad mouth this young lady. I don’t think you know what is on the video, do you?


159 posted on 11/11/2009 12:40:13 PM PST by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Wpin
No sex as in no intercourse. The report had her masturbating. No, I did not see the tape, and given the fact it's of a 17-year old, nor do I wish to. I'm not "bad mouthing" her. She made a mistake, yet you and she still try to play it down. I think you're just upset because she isn't as pure as the driven snow, as you would wish her to be.

Part of being a "conservative" means taking personal responsibility for one's actions. What she's doing is spin. I'm not afraid to call out my own, why are you?
160 posted on 11/11/2009 12:44:30 PM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson