Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The human body is built for running (and Richard Dawkins develops a crack in his misotheist armor!)
Science Literature Blog ^ | October 29, 2009 | David Tyler, Ph.D.

Posted on 10/30/2009 7:49:53 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

Alongside all the public interest in sporting prowess, recent research has added significantly to our knowledge of how the human body actually works. Many characteristics we take for granted now appear to be critical success factors. Take, for example, our toes. We do not need long toes, like monkeys and apes, because our toes are not used for grasping branches. But are they vestigial - withered remnants of once-grand appendages? The answer is: most definitely not! Whilst it is possible to walk comfortably with longer toes, running is different. Increase toe length by just 20% and there is a doubling of the peak digital flexor impulses and the mechanical work required.

It emerges that the human body has numerous traits that all support the ability to run...

(Excerpt) Read more at arn.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anatomy; anthropology; belongsinreligion; catholic; christian; creation; divideandconquerfr; evangelical; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; judaism; notasciencetopic; philosophy; propellerbeanie; protestant; science; spammer; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last
To: GodGunsGuts
You’re on, and welcome aboard the HMS Creation ping list!

I would like to create an ID ping list but don't know of any FReepers that are IDers.

141 posted on 10/31/2009 8:56:05 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
More words and opinions for your perusal and dismissal at posts 127 and 130.

Mo better.

142 posted on 10/31/2009 9:02:10 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

dumber than dumb...crudwater.


143 posted on 10/31/2009 10:15:49 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

No data. Dismissed.


144 posted on 10/31/2009 10:21:21 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
dumber than dumb...crudwater.

It took you 26 hours to come up with that?

145 posted on 10/31/2009 10:47:41 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

My son had a 12mm difference before I took him to the chiropractor. After 3 months of adjustments only 5mm. Before he’d whine and complain about walking any distance over 1-2 miles. After he’d walk 5-6 miles and even took a teacher up on a challenge to a 5k race. He didn’t train for it though, but won anyways (just barely), and walked like a 90 year old man for a couple of days afterward.

See my homepage for more about chiropractic care.


146 posted on 10/31/2009 10:56:27 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

A regular paced walk can finish a marathon - 26.2 miles - in 6-8 hours.

Before automation mankind worked sun-up to sun-down which would allow the fittest to easily cover 40-50 miles/day.


147 posted on 10/31/2009 11:06:45 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

Not without stopping.


148 posted on 10/31/2009 11:23:54 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Before automation mankind worked sun-up to sun-down which would allow the fittest to easily cover 40-50 miles/day.

Marathon horses carry riders over 100 miles in the same time.

149 posted on 10/31/2009 11:26:40 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Part of the 100 mile ride ....


150 posted on 10/31/2009 11:28:10 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

Endurance Rides (ERs), these are only for advanced horse and rider combinations. They are the hardest test for both. All FEI and International competitions are ERs, but there are also many ERs on the National calendar. They usually begin with a mass start, and the riders aim to cover the distance as fast as they can, taking into account the terrain and welfare of their horse. During the Ride the rider will be required to present their horse to the vet at various set intervals to be checked as fit to continue. Following this are rest periods called “holds” where the horse and rider can eat and take a breather before continuing. Many riders’ ultimate goal is the successful completion of an Endurance Ride. These vary from 80 –160 km in a day or longer over several days.


151 posted on 10/31/2009 11:30:03 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

Endurance riding was first developed in the early 1900s as a military test for cavalry mounts. Horses were required to go on a 5-day, 300 mile (483 km) ride carrying at least 200 lbs. The cavalry test became a civilian sport in the early 1950s.


152 posted on 10/31/2009 11:32:29 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Still up on your high horse I see. /s

I was just sayin what was possible for the avg. human in good condtion,
but lookin back and extrapolatin it appears 1800mi in a 31 day period is also possible.

I do admire the ability and strength of the horse and you’ll find God singles out and says very favorable things about horses too. However, it’s apparent that anything longer than several 100mi endurance days is not something any horse should be punished by man with just to try an prove a point.


153 posted on 10/31/2009 11:52:59 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Would you then concede, in a purely hypothetical situation, that the faster runner would be able to pass his genes on to his offspring while the slower runner would spend eternity as tiger poop?

But where did the genes come from in the first place? How many mutations do you see that make legs (two at a time) longer, stronger and coordinated? Are your children, if taller than you, because of mutation? No because the genes were present in them already and because of good nutrition.

On the other hand you will see many, many defective legs because of mutation.

154 posted on 11/01/2009 1:26:20 AM PDT by Bellflower (If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
and extrapolatin it appears 1800mi in a 31 day period is also possible.

Are you saying that it is possible for a human to walk 1800 miles in 31 days?

155 posted on 11/01/2009 7:53:23 AM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Yes of course - but then anything is possible when you are a believer in the one true God, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is seen and unseen, all-powerful, all-seeing, all-knowing.


156 posted on 11/01/2009 10:33:15 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

I missed your comment until tonight when I was going back and looking for another one.

An example error is this: “This is nothing unusual, because most biologists working in this field have come to accept Darwinism as their interpretative paradigm. “

Darwinism is very far out of date...the current paradigm is far more advanced than this strawman.


157 posted on 11/02/2009 6:43:07 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson