Posted on 10/19/2009 7:25:00 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Via Breitbart. I wont spoil the surprise by telling you her answer, but suffice it to say, its not much of a surprise. Im not sure why they stopped with a psychiatrist, though. Wouldnt Jane Goodall have had some potentially valuable insights here? Or an FBI criminal profiler?
Remember, this is the objective cable news network.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Because listening to barry scares the shit out of me!
This is the White House’s idea of ‘news’, as opposed to the FNC.
Can we get Glenn Beck to fact-check this CNN interview? Or maybe someone on Saturday Night Live would volunteer to do it?
Let's reverse the concept: "What kind of problem do people who watch CNN have?"
I'm not too concerned, there's only like 11 or 12 of them these days...
Idiots.
Of course they won’t.
A better question would be to ask: “Why do the few people that watch CNN continue to watch that news network? Is there some kind of masochism involved, or is CNN just doing a very good job of keeping people ignorant?”
A better questions is “Why don’t they listen to CNN?”
Because it is government packaged propaganda.
What was her answer ?
communists use to ran psychiatry wards for all the opposition
Psychotics at CNN seek psychiatric help?
Can't they just get a medical marijuana card?
Rush has more money than CNN I bet. Remember his spatula city routine? Or his ‘’Ft. worthless Jim’’ jab? That’s the 1st one I recall hearing.
Libs are certifiably insane if they think they can prevail in psychological warfare against ccnservatives.
With the TV remote now neither CNN or many others can claim many regular viewers, ‘’channel serfing’’ ya know.
This is nothing new. Back when Goldwater ran for president, all sorts of leftist shrinks were saying he was certifiably crazy. There was a relentless barrage by the leftist media (even then they were dominant) against Goldwater. In about four or five years of the Johnson admin, the public knew who the crazy people were.
The real question is why do people listen to CNN.
It’s funny that libs just can’t accept the basic reason why conservatives listen to conservative talk radio: it’s a medium that’s friendly to our point of view. Simple as that. Naturally since libs like to portray conservatives as “angry”, they have to lie about it. Listen to Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, or a host of conservative talk show hosts, and then tell me they’re angry people. Even Rush rarely talks in an excited tone. Hannity only gets mad at smart-aleck lib callers. I’m wondering who’s the lib talk show host in the top ten. They, lib talk show hosts, are all pathetically boring.
later
We are poor little sheep, who've lost ther way.
BaaaaaH! Baaaaah! BaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaH!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.