Skip to comments.
Susan Daniels signed affadavit confirming Obama used deceased man's SS#
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20509291/KEYES-v-OBAMA-78-4-Exhibit-Affidavit-PI-Susan-Daniels-Obama-s-use-of-SS-number-of-the-deceased-Taitz-Orly-Entered-10-01-2009-Gov-uscourts ^
Posted on 10/11/2009 10:02:29 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
This is outrageous. I believe we really are experiencing a bloodless coup.
Our representatives need to be forced to ask questions about Obama's Social Security fraud recorded in this affadavit dated September 30, 2009.
Look at the document at the link.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bcrepository; birthcertificate; birther; birtherhilarity; birthers; certifigate; daniels; obama; orly; orlytaitz; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-253 next last
To: cycle of discernment
I believe 34 is the number of SS#’s he has used. And this man is allowed to proceed as president and sign an executive order, (his first action) to seal ALL of his own documents/records.
2
posted on
10/11/2009 10:05:27 AM PDT
by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: cycle of discernment
Excuse my ignorance but who is Susan Daniels and why is an affadavit from her important?
3
posted on
10/11/2009 10:05:31 AM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(atement)
To: cycle of discernment
4
posted on
10/11/2009 10:05:41 AM PDT
by
varina davis
(Life is not a dress rehearsal)
To: cycle of discernment
5
posted on
10/11/2009 10:07:09 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: xkaydet65
Go read the link. It’s a short read. Interesting!
To: xkaydet65
7
posted on
10/11/2009 10:08:37 AM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: cycle of discernment
OK- so what does this mean? The Fed assigned a previously used SS# and recycled it to Zero?
This is nonsense....I'm all for nailing the kenyan, but this is a pig in a poke.
8
posted on
10/11/2009 10:08:38 AM PDT
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: cycle of discernment
Ah.’cmon—I’m sure that obamination just “miswrote” just as he “mispeaks” without a teleprompter to guide him. /s
9
posted on
10/11/2009 10:08:53 AM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: cycle of discernment
That link triggered a big warning from my mcafee. I’m just sayin’.
10
posted on
10/11/2009 10:09:16 AM PDT
by
Canedawg
(FUBO)
To: gidget7
“”””””I believe 34 is the number of SS#s he has used. And this man is allowed to proceed as president and sign an executive order, (his first action) to seal ALL of his own documents/records.”””””””””””
Link?????
To: cycle of discernment
12
posted on
10/11/2009 10:10:04 AM PDT
by
houeto
(I peered inside the Treasury's door, the entire vault was empty. We've been robbed!)
To: cycle of discernment
Anything or anyone associated with Orly Taitz is questionable, IMHO.
13
posted on
10/11/2009 10:11:32 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians BS.)
To: cycle of discernment
5. I located a social security number for Barack Hussein Obama and found that it was issued between 1977 and 1979 in the state of Connecticut
7. Further, the number asigned to Barack Obama may have been assigned previously, as it appears to also be associated with someone born in the year 1890
8. The true and correct copies I personally obtained are attached
Signed by Susan Daniels Oct 30, 2009
hmmm
14
posted on
10/11/2009 10:11:53 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: cycle of discernment
From the PI’s affidavit;
“7. Further, the number assigned to Barack Obama may have been assigned previously, as it appears to also be associated with someone born in the year 1890.”
To: nuconvert
“Signed by Susan Daniels Oct.30,2009”
You mean a big HMMMMM?
16
posted on
10/11/2009 10:14:03 AM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Canedawg
That link triggered a big warning from my mcafee. Im just sayin I'm starting to get concerned. Someone else said last nite that their McAfee showed a 'trojan' on a link that was posted. I have Norton and haven't received any warningswhen clicking on the links. Maybe my security settings are off? What's your opinion?
17
posted on
10/11/2009 10:14:39 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(In Defense of Liberty.........Radicalism may be necessary.)
To: cycle of discernment
To: nuconvert
“hmmm”
-
uhhh ... it says September 30.
To: LucyT
20
posted on
10/11/2009 10:16:28 AM PDT
by
houeto
(I peered inside the Treasury's door, the entire vault was empty. We've been robbed!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-253 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson