Posted on 09/17/2009 4:49:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
The part on the under-aged prostitution ring begins about 5 minutes into the 35 min audio segment. And it continues on at about 11 mins into it (following other news).
Wrong! If a huge, federally-funded right-wing organization was arranging loans for paedophile brothels we would want them caught.
ACORN and Obama were spawned in the same swamp.
Exactly and that is the difference between us and them
Saunders is barking up the wrong tree here. I don't see how it was Beck's responsibility to verify that. It's just one more example of what sort of people are working for ACORN. There seem to be no limits to what some of them will say, or what advice, legal or otherwise, they will offer those who seek their help.
Debra J. Saunders didn't watch Beck or others. Everyone said they didn't know what to make of it. Beck said law enforcement was contacted and had no comment. Showing her saying she shot her husband made the point ACORN hires lunatics whether she did kill or husband or not.
What was Beck supposed to do? Hide that part of the tape?
If he did the left would say he hid the part proving she is delusional.
What is the matter with Saunders? She's usually brighter than this.
The corruption @ ACORN pales in comparison to the shoddy goods being marketed by the msm, which has now been clearly exposed.
Acorn is Obama.
The President is merely one of the Democrat Criminal Enterprise entities connected by a line to the center of the web of criscrossing threads of deceit and corruption.
The web and all the contents must be physically destroyed to return America as America. As long as one entity is allowed to live, it will regrow
A strong case can be made that the two young activists established the proverbial "pattern of behavior" where ACORN is concerned. I expect that is why they visited so many ACORN offices. Isn't Saunders some sort of conservative? This is a terrible column from her. Why is she trying to diminish what was accomplished?
Debra got a big “but” at the end there, and she has been expressing sympathy for the devil for years. Melanie Morgan wrote her off a long time ago.
I wonder what you’d come up with if you went out to some of the ACORN locals posing as ACORN reps, and ask if they’ve scrubbed their paperwork and briefed the workers on what to tell the investigators.
Gee, Deb, just a little pouty that the right is starting to fight by the left’s rules of engagement....
Saunders is barking up the wrong tree here. I don't see how it was Beck's responsibility to verify that. It's just one more example of what sort of people are working for ACORN. There seem to be no limits to what some of them will say, or what advice, legal or otherwise, they will offer those who seek their help.
Yes, Beck and the couple didn't claim she had killed anyone, she said it in her own words. For this guy to claim it was Beck's responsibility to verify is like saying there was a smear done on Van Jones by using his own words against them.
Beck made a disclaimer on his show and said they couldn't confirm she had actually killed anyone. That's all he needed to do to cover his butt and the couples.
BTW, Breitbart has a document on his website(biggovernment.com)that shows there is a dead husband in her background.
Not only that, one of her recent husbands(I think she has two on record)has a restraining order out against her, gotta be a reason for that.
The fact is she said it, talked about it, confessed it...and it was a falsehood? If she hadn't killed her husband, if I were him I'd be watching my back. How many other young girls has she given the murder advice too?
Monday, July 13, 2009
Michael McCray: “No one knows how much ACORN i
EXCERPT
Q: One of the complaints we’ve heard related to funding among all of the various ACORN-related entities. What were some of the more egregious activities you saw perpetrated by top management?
A: Well the multi-million embezzlement and 8 year cover up has to lead the list of egregious illegal conduct. The embezzlement was publicly reported to be $1 million, however the board was notified that the true number was at least $5 million.
Senior Staff and the Executive Committee knew about the embezzlement and covered it up for eight years.
We believe that any participated in, benefited from or knew about and withheld information about the embezzlement from the board should be terminated and/or removed from any association with ACORN. We demanded a forensic examination and independent financial audit of ACORN and all of its related entities to ferret out the wrongdoers.
Q: Mixing of non-profit funds with those of the for-profit entities has been mentioned repeatedly as an ACORN theme. How bad is or was this situation and where do you see it leading?
A: Our position is simply this we do not believe that the national board of directors has ever been given access to ACORNs corporate books and financial records. Thus, no one really knows how much ACORN is actually worth and how much non-profit vs for profit funding has flown through ACORN unless and until there is a forensic examination and independent audit. We know that all funding flowed through Citizens Consulting Inc. (CCI). But CCI claims to be a private company but it is really the financial management division of ACORN.
Ultimately, their must be a forensic examination and audit of ACORN. Otherwise know one will ever know for sure how much went into ACORN, how much money was co-mingled at ACORN or how much money was embezzled from ACORN. Its just that simple.
She sounds mad because she didn’t think of this herself.
This isn't a couple of stupid quotes, this is a pattern done over 5 different offices now and more coming. This sting wouldn't work on some one who is honest, it isn't as if the words were taken out of context, they are caught giving illegal advice too a pimp and his hooker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.