Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue

WND ^ | 9/8/09 | staff

[pissant]

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

[US Navy Vet]

Is this Hugh or Series?

[SeattleBruce]

No, I do not agree to speculation. It is your opinion, not mine.
+++++++++++++++++

I wish I didn’t have to speculate on any of this. Perhaps you’re referring only and specifically to speculating about Judge Carter. Yeah, I hope he’s the exception of an honorable Democrat or an honorable independent - or whatever he claims to be..

[FARS]

good parry but not as credible as your perverse pleasure in highlighting negative turns rather than progress designates

[PA-RIVER]

Yes, but if a judge orders Hawaii to produce, Hawaii can say “Stick it, we only answer to Hawiian courts”.

I think he will order Hussein to provide the documents, and corner him.

[SeattleBruce]

You asked, “If this Judge orders documents released from Hawaii, Will Hussein refuse to comply with the order?” If Judge Carter sends a court order for the HI Vital Records, the Obammy will not be in the loop. He cannot refuse when it is HI being subpoenaed.
+++++++++++++++

In which case this may finally be spinning out of control to the puppet masters of the WH. If this is finally revealed, it will also send strong signals to any other feaux candidate for the POTUS, which is one of the biggest reasons that any of us on the BC, NBC, school transcript side, have pursued this issue - for our posterity and the integrity of the US Constitution and the office of the President of the United States.

I really would like to see a SCOTUS ruling on what NBC is in the USC.

[little jeremiah]

I for one appreciate your slamdowns of NS. He asks for it, and you deliver. It’s a beautiful thing imo.

[AmericanVictory]

Everything filed to date in the case by the appellees in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, under the signatures of Robert Bauer and kate Ellen Andrias of Perkins Coie also bears the signature of R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U. S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney;s Office (USA) Appellate Division, Civil Unit, 555 4th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20530. Why do you think your pals in the White House are not more open about this appearance?

[the anti-liberal]

bkmrk

[little jeremiah]

I agree.

[MHGinTN]

No, provenance cannot be guaranteed by ordering Obammy to produce the documentation. Contrary to NS's claim that an Internet image cannot be deemed a fraud, the first exhibit Hussein tried to post as his proof of eligibility was clewarly a fradu since it lack a rasied seal, which when questioned he had added to the first fraud and then re-exhibited on the Internet. There are telltale markers which show the first was altered to create the second fraud, but I sure am not revealing the markers here.

The third exhibit Obammy allowed Factcheck to photograph and handle was not the same exhibit used the first and second frauds because it lacked the markers in the first and second frauds. Authenticity is still in question, and anyone who tries to convince you that the effort to use fraudulent exhibits from the start has no bearing on the questioning of provenance of the handled exhibit is blowing smoke up your leg to put you off the trail.

We've has another obamanoid named WOSG trying to float that little deceit, even goning so far as to tell us that we should ignore the first fraudulent exhibits and focus solely on the third exhibit.

[RummyChick]

The son of FMD said that FMD and Helen Canfield Davis were listed as parents on his birth certificate. I thought that was an odd way to say who his parents were.. Does he look like Obama

[Non-Sequitur]

good parry but not as credible as your perverse pleasure in highlighting negative turns rather than progress designates

I don't see the progress that you do. This case is proceeding slowly but surely, one step at a time. The next hurdle for Taitz is the motion to dismiss, and that should be settled on October 5th or shortly after. And while I don't really expect it to survive that, I kind of wish it would go to trial if for no other reason than to see Taitz perform in an actual courtroom in an actual trial.

[FARS]

So you would prefer she drop the case and let you handle it?

At least she has carried the ball at her own expense - in many ways - to where it now has a chance of getting the Defense to have to show some documents.

The blocking of discovery motion as Sibre Fan crows about as a negative, has not been granted. Obamabots are trying their best to derail anything they can.

I wonder if Kreep is as straightforward as he claims and not runing interference.

You might both ant to hold back on MOnday morning quarterbacking and rooting for the opposing team

[PA-RIVER]

Game, Set, Match???

If the judge Orders the Long form and all companion documents from Hussein, that exist in the Hawaiian state files, and Hussein fails to comply, then the Plaintiff wins by Default.

Then it goes to the next appeals court that will probably want to help Hussein. But the peril is, it gets bigger legs.

[mojitojoe]

Non-Sequitur has said many times that he enjoys causing arguments with fellow FReepers and that he comes to the Civil War and BC threads to call people names and fight. Dissension is not a bad thing, but staying on FR because you get your jollies from fighting and flooding threads where other FReepers are doing serious investigating is not fair and should be addressed by the mods and owners. NS is a very slick, but very obvious Obama fan.

[mojitojoe]

I sent you the link, did you donate to FR? or are you here just to use the site for your own benefit?

[mkjessup]

Oh I don't know about that, I've been hitting the bullseye on your lying ass with pretty good accuracy.
So you would like to believe.

Go back and read the thread, I've been kicking your ass up one side and down the other, and most of that was easily done just by quoting your own puerile sputterings, i.e., as Pogo might say "you has met the enemy, and he is you", lol

[mojitojoe]

Perfection, sheer perfection. I hope you sent that to the mods and Jim.

[mojitojoe]

YES you are and your past posts are being copied one by one, and will be sent to JR

[mkjessup]

I for one appreciate your slamdowns of NS. He asks for it, and you deliver. It’s a beautiful thing imo.

It's kinda like one of those old games of 'Whack-A-Mole' except in this case, the mole is a little less creative.