[PA-RIVER]

Yes, but if a judge orders Hawaii to produce, Hawaii can say “Stick it, we only answer to Hawiian courts”.

I think he will order Hussein to provide the documents, and corner him.

[MHGinTN]

No, provenance cannot be guaranteed by ordering Obammy to produce the documentation. Contrary to NS's claim that an Internet image cannot be deemed a fraud, the first exhibit Hussein tried to post as his proof of eligibility was clewarly a fradu since it lack a rasied seal, which when questioned he had added to the first fraud and then re-exhibited on the Internet. There are telltale markers which show the first was altered to create the second fraud, but I sure am not revealing the markers here.

The third exhibit Obammy allowed Factcheck to photograph and handle was not the same exhibit used the first and second frauds because it lacked the markers in the first and second frauds. Authenticity is still in question, and anyone who tries to convince you that the effort to use fraudulent exhibits from the start has no bearing on the questioning of provenance of the handled exhibit is blowing smoke up your leg to put you off the trail.

We've has another obamanoid named WOSG trying to float that little deceit, even goning so far as to tell us that we should ignore the first fraudulent exhibits and focus solely on the third exhibit.