Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
pretty please, if you wouldn't mind, if it's not too much trouble, if you feel so inclined, if it doesn't go against your scruples, or interfere with your Christian sensibilities, would you be good enough, to consider, just for once, making a contribution to this thread...
or get off the soap box?
Hello Fred, I sent a email to Orly Taitz and this was the reply i got back- could you help with SAD birth certificate to see if its valid— Orly dont think it is—thx
I do not believe it is
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:51 PM, (removed my email address)
Hello Orly, Did you have a chance to see if “Stanley Ann Dunhams” Birth certificate was a legit BC? the number issue that you told me about?- and it being hand written? and the seal? — thanks a bunch -darin
—
Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
orlytaitzesq.com
You understood me perfectly, but understanding won’t endear you to the resident critics, who have some weird idea that I’m some sort of subversive who’s trying to magically convert the two little boys you see in the photographs into two little boys whom they are not. Got that? They don’t believe their own eyes, and that presents a real problem.
Perhaps my immediate contribution is to highlight how disgusting it is for a couple of contributors to these threads to relentlessly, neverendingly insult, mock, demean & lie about everyone w whom they disagree. Perhaps people are finally sufficiently sick & tired of that MO to want to see a change.
Of course those for whom insults are their only real stock in trade can never give them up. Yet merely highlighting the frequency & degree to which certain posters resort to personal insults, put-downs, ridicule, etc., can serve a valuable purpose. Adults don’t like being treated like children, and it’s only children who insult as relentlessly as some on eligibility threads do. The time may have come to say, ‘enough’. We shall see.
The World needs to see this. (sarc) Orly doesn’t think the BC for Stanley Ann Dunham is real! (I have my doubts about her Social Security Application having the right birthdate on it myself, but that’s only because I think her birthdate has been fudged, she was probably too young to have been Class of 1960, and that’s why the ‘classmates’ can’t show you a yearbook, she wasn’t in it for 1960. And you know what that does, don’t you? That means she was still in high school somewhere when the little tiger was conceived.)
And she’s not his mother.
What you really want is an excuse to complain to the boss so that you can get the entire thread removed, because the contents bother you. Almost 11,500 comments down the shute. You’ve done it before. Good luck with that, I don’t give a brass razoo.
btw, that’s how the muslims work, they provoke and prod and push until someone fights back and then they claim VICTIMHOOD.
LET ME BE VERY CLEAR— I DONT “THINK” IT IS EATHER.. But- should “varify” IT..— If it is a fraud and proven a fraud it would change things alot— WHY WOULD STANLEY ANNS BC NEED TO BE FORGED????????????
Projection. Look it up.
MIGHT IT BE BECAUSE SHE’S NOT HIS MOTHER? HELLO!
But zero also has a forgery and so far no one seems to give a d*mn about that. EITHER.
thats true, it could be anything— lets figure it out
“Who at these two Us hates Obama so much that they wd commit large scale academic fraud for the purpose of undercutting Dreams?? & how did they persuade so many liberals to go along w cutting the legs out from under Obama’s much ballyhooed ‘memoir’?”
Exactly! Those wanting to claim that INS, UH and UW documents are all forged have to come up with a motive for destroying Barry’s Dreams narrative. And such widespread forgeries of documents and microfiche records would be immediately detected by subpoenaing witnesses and during forensic examination in any discovery.
Just like the birth certificate for Barry? You really are living in Dreams...
So far no one has been permitted to proceed to the discovery stage in challenging Obama’s BC. But many, such as Tim Adams, have raised red flags & challenged the BC’s authenticity. Kindly point me to a single whistle blower who has challenged SADO’s official transcripts. If they were forged to the degree required by the ‘she didn’t set foot in HI till ‘63’ theory, someone [actually, many someones] put themselves in serious legal jeopardy. Odd, no one has ever alleged such a thing, outside the group of people who require the transcripts to be forged in order to validate their theory.
They seem to be missing the fact that if the transcripts were forged as alleged [by the Mal-Val theory] the results HURT Obama’s Dreams narrative. What about that is so hard for them to comprehend???
Oh, & although the transcripts were forged in such a way as to call Obama a liar to his face, not a single academic liberal has spoken up. Obama is their hero; if anti-Obama/Dreams-debunkers at HoHI & UoWA [who knew they even existed???] contrived fake transcripts to undercut the left’s big hero, you can’t tell me at least one of these pointy headed moonbats wd not have opened his/her mouth by now.
Last I heard, it wasn’t illegal to tell lies, so her schoolfriends and various classmates are safe, and there have been no transcripts from Hawaii U for a start, just a letter confirming that Stanley Ann Dunham was enrolled from the Fall of 1960.
If that student was Ann S Obama listed in the Honolulu Polk for 1961, and if that student only attended for a short while, the author could be forgiven for assuming Ann S Obama was Stanley Ann Dunham, for hasn’t the whole world been told she married the kenyan student?
As for the rest of it, don’t look to me for any legal action, I’m an Australian, I don’t even understand your system or its language as it is written in Latin. Look to your own countrymen. And you, my little sweetheart, might just be a perfect example of why no one has stepped up to the plate and taken it further, or taken risks to their own lives, or kicked in the millions of dollars it would take...the moment any indication appears that that myth or its various accepted offshoots aren’t all there is to the fraud, out come the shears, snip snip snip...let’s nip this one in the bud...there’s someone trying to tell us that the whole myth from start to finish is a fabrication, and we cannot allow that. Lalalala...I’m singing so I’m deaf.
Congratulations. With everything you write, you make the point more clear. Like the man said, ‘You can’t handle the truth.’
And the truth is you don’t know who his parents were or where he was born or when his birthday was, all you’ve been doing the last four or five years is sticking the round peg of Stanley Ann Dunham into the square hole of mother-hood and you can’t make it fit, because there’s no physical evidence of her presence in Hawaii before 1963.
Carry on all you like.
Corsi said he has seen the transcripts. He is the one who, as a result of the transcripts he has seen, places SADO in ‘61 first in HI & then in Seattle. If you are asking me to call Corsi a liar, you have come to the wrong party.
“Obama is their hero; if anti-Obama/Dreams-debunkers at HoHI & UoWA [who knew they even existed???] contrived fake transcripts to undercut the left’s big hero, you can’t tell me at least one of these pointy headed moonbats wd not have opened his/her mouth by now.”
Correct! UH and UW are crawling with leftie supporters of Barry and they HATE WND! Why haven’t they denounced Corsi as a fraud...oh, wait...well at least regarding the UH and UW transcripts?
Exactly. What is more, one of the articles I read yesterday said that ‘Obama’s supporters say Stanley Ann was not in Seattle in the fall of ‘61.’ It actually said that. Well, you can see why. Corsi says she was there—he says he confirmed it w UoWA officials—& that destroys the Dreams narrative. So Obama’s ***supporters*** contrived some wacky scenario to argue that in fact she wasn’t there.
Kind of makes you want to stop & think for a minute or two...doesn’t it?
And now that the pics have been sorted out,* the attention is turned to authenticity of college transcripts and a single letter difference in a first name.
I remember the discussion about transcripts; in which thread was the claim that they were fake/altered/forged debunked?
Need to put the link in ...
*
There are three different boys in that batch of pics that were posted
Two of them have rectangular faces, eyebrows that turn/angle down at the nose ends.
One of the above two has a “widows peak” at the middle of the forehead hairline, and is dark complected. This is Mark. The other lighter skinned kid with rectangular face is his brother David.
Mark and David are the two boys in the outdoor pix with Obama SR and the white lady with straight bangs. Lady is Ruth who he married after divorcing Stanley Ann.
The third boy has a face with the forehead wider than the jaw, a pointed chin, and eyebrows that go straight across.
This is 0, Obama’s son by Stanley Ann.
Its not correct to mix everyone together and say the light skinned kid with the rectangular face and the kid with the oval pointy chin face are the same kid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.