Had a sign similar to this one been hanging
on the White House front door it just
may have scared him off.
Posted on 07/31/2009 10:59:02 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
In a recent telephone poll conducted by Research 2000 for the website Daily Kos, 58 percent of Republican respondents when asked if Barack Obama was born in the USA answered "no" or "not sure."
The Daily Kos, which calls itself "the largest progressive community blog in the United States," nonetheless found a reported 527 Republicans and 601 independents to accompany its 743 Democrats in answering the question.
Among Republicans, 28 percent answered they believe Obama was born outside the U.S., while 30 percent answered "not sure." Among independents, 83 percent affirmed their belief that the president was born in the U.S., while an overwhelming 93 percent of Democrats insisted it is so.
Join the petition campaign to demand President Obama resolve the question by revealing his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!
While the disparity between Republicans and Democrats is massive, the poll also demonstrated that where respondents live also makes a significant difference.
(Story continues below)
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Better people than me have speculated that Obama keeps it hidden because there is other embarrassing stuff on the birth certificate. So use your imaginations
It took a freedom-of-information request just for him to release the photos of Air Force One over the statue of liberty. “Transparency” indeed!
Hardly anyone’s heard of Rodinia. But the later continent of Pangea is well known (and has a cooler name), so no, I don’t believe this either.
So Bamster was produced by Granny and Frank, who you left out was also bisexual in the Bill Ayers mold. I like your speculation!
Lou Dobbs is correct. Show it and be done with it.
The thing that will destroying him is not the "what on it" speculation by people
It the "why he fighting it?" speculation thats building...The "why" will be the cancer
The "why" no matter what he does or does not do now, can never be really answer now (unless what he release is bad for him) ...
Because people will fill in the why" and in their mind the logic will tell them it could only be something bad (why fight or hide nothing)
Had a sign similar to this one been hanging
on the White House front door it just
may have scared him off.
Whenever a Democratic says "clearly" or "transparency" or "sustainable" you know they are about to lie
Ah, yes.
The Sarah Palin scenario in reverse.
Well, the lefties have set a precedent,
OK
There could be nothing conceivably embarrassing about:
His time of birth
His birthday
His city of birth
His county of birth
His island of birth
His religion (religion is not even listed)
His mother's race
His mother's maiden name
The date it was filed
A few things could be a slightly embarrassing:
The serial number? Maybe? Suppose it's really 151-1961-010666 instead of the asserted 151-1961-010641
His father's name wasn't listed. Not terribly unlikely if he and Stanley Ann split up before he was born. A politician who’s a bastard? No one cares.
Suppose Stanley Ann used her Anna Toot alias and named him Mortimer Snerdly Toot? Embarrassing? Sure. But he changed it as soon as he could (Why the Hussein middle name, though?)
Unless the real BC shows birth outside the USofA the only truly embarrassing thing left is if his sex is listed as female.
That would explain his pitching style. (Although Larry Sinclair says he’s more a catcher)...
Transparency? 
pacity!
“Better people than me have speculated that Obama keeps it hidden because there is other embarrassing stuff on the birth certificate. So use your imaginations”
I’m a bit late to the game, what are the possibilities if anyone here can tell me, that would be embarrassing? Like dual citizenship?
IF he was born in Hawaii, AND his father is Frank Marshal Davis, then he would be an NBC by even the most stringent definition - born on American soil of American parents
End of problem, he's constitutionally eligible.
******
I don't understand your statement above about Frank Marshal Davis being Obama's father.
1. What about all those eligibility forms that Obama signed in each state as Barack Obama?
2. What about the fact that Obama took the oath as President as Barack Obama?
3. My point is this: If Obama is really a Davis and not an Obama, doesn't that fact invalidate the eligibility forms he signed as Obama and also invalidate the presidential oath Obama took as Obama?
4. In other words if the person known as Barack Obama never legally existed, how can he receive votes for President of the United States and occupy the White House?
5. And if Obama signed his eligibility forms as Obama but Obama knew that he was really a Davis, isn't Obama/Davis guilty of terrible crimes against the United States?
It would be a tad embarrasing to know he is ineligible to run for El-Presidente. Other than that, discretions frowned upon would probably be forgiven by the people.
In that statement I'm only addressing the narrow issue of Constitutional eligibility.
He's demonstrated he's not qualified, the question is: is he eligible?
isn't Obama/Davis guilty of terrible crimes against the United States?
Yes. But he's guilty of those crimes regardless of his birth name or his Constitutional eligibility.
Yeah, that'll work, after four years of allowing this controversy to grow and fester in the minds of the public.
Yep. Brilliant strategy.
Fair enough. I have a feeling this is growing and I love it!
I am coming to the conclusion that he is not legal. I left this matter alone until this week. He refuses to quell a simple matter. The media knows the waves of America and he is the New Wave.
If true, it means that Obama LIED in the “autobiographies” that made Obama famous in the first place.
If true, it means Obama, instead of being “transparent” -— made a PROFIT, a HUGE profit, off of a bogus, made up “past” -— most “authors” are disgraced by that conduct, what should that do to an “author” President?
This thing has POLITICAL legs, even if it does not get any LEGAL legs!
Obama is illegitimate, and we need to pound that home every chance we get!
Referenced by Jet Jaguar, posted on FR by pissant.
Constitutionalists v. The AfterBirthers
Brief, humorous and very on point.
* *
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2304170/posts
The Island of Dr. Fukino - Bizarre Statements on Obama’s origins
PA Times | 7/29/09 | Pissant
Back in October 2008, after the dreaded Constitutionalists began closing in on Obama’s fraudulent Certification of Live Birth (COLB), out popped the Head of Hawaii’s Dept of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, a middle aged, balding, sturdy woman, to provide the first of two statements she would make in an attempt to tamp down the controversy.
“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record”
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i,....policies and procedures.”
But the controversy was NOT that Obama did not have an original birth certificate. The controversy was that he had not RELEASED it.
The Constitutionalists and AfterBirthers both understood that the COLB scan Obama allegedly sent to leftwing organs FactCheck and DailyKos was at best a modern, computer generated summation document with limited info culled from a State database. Constitutionalists claimed it to a fraud, while AfterBirthers claimed it reflected reality...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.