If true, it means that Obama LIED in the “autobiographies” that made Obama famous in the first place.
If true, it means Obama, instead of being “transparent” -— made a PROFIT, a HUGE profit, off of a bogus, made up “past” -— most “authors” are disgraced by that conduct, what should that do to an “author” President?
This thing has POLITICAL legs, even if it does not get any LEGAL legs!
Obama is illegitimate, and we need to pound that home every chance we get!
A politician lied? Horrors!
Anything he’s done or said can be spun around an axlerod and twisted out of all recognition.
Unlike every other issue, constitutional ineligibility cannot be fixed, finessed, spun, or ignored out of existence.
It is the ultimate show stopper, the wooden stake, the silver bullet, the gold kryptonite that will PERMANENTLY slay this monster.
Not only could he never ever ever run for the office again (Richard Nixon lost the presidency and permanently retired from politics in 1960, remember?) the very fact that the dems let an unqualified candidate get into the White House would damage their street cred for an entire generation!
Speaking of damage, every bill he signed, ever executive order he issued, every treaty he negotiated would instantly become null and void. We’d get a ‘reset’ to the moment he took office.
That is why I’ve devoted so much of my run time to this issue, although there is a very low probability of success, the rewards are very great indeed.
If that makes me a simpleton in your eyes, so be it.