Posted on 07/17/2009 5:48:28 AM PDT by kellynla
OK, I confess, the title is a bit misleading.
It should read Obama And His Lack Of A Birth Certificate Is About To Make History.
Yesterday, World Net Daily broke the story of Army Major Stefan Cook, who argued that he should not have to deploy to Afghanistan because President Obama has not proven that he is a natural-born citizen, therefore he is unable to serve as Commander-In-Chief.
This is something that will receive little, if any, coverage from the mainstream media.
However, the fact that the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a soldier about to be sent overseas based wholly upon such a claim is unprecedented.
This controversy over Obamas failure to produce a valid birth certificate has been an ongoing saga.
And all calls for him to do so have either been belittled or ignored by the White House. Which may lead some folks to suspect that the reason he doesnt simply produce the blasted thing and put this story to rest once and for all is because he doesnt have one!
About the only attention we have seen regarding this issue was the presentation of a Certificate Of Live Birth supposedly issued by the State of Hawaii.
This proves less than nothing, as first, to look at it you would think that a 12-year old made it on their home computer, and secondly is the fact that a child does not have to be born in Hawaii in order for the state to issue such a document to the childs parents.
Even if this document is legitimate, it is a far cry from an actual birth certificate, and it surely is not proof of where Obama was actually born.
However , there are literally thousands of articles and opinions floating around about Obamas birth certificate, or lack therof, and I dont want to bore you with re-visiting the same stories.
Rather, I would like to expound on my claim that Obamas lack of a birth certificate will make history. Consider the following:
If indeed it is proven that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, and therefore is unable to serve as President, he will not be remembered as Americas first black President, rather history will remember him as the man who was the cause of the biggest Constitutional crisis this country has ever seen!
The question will be raised of what will happen to other troops deployed by Obama, and the troops already serving under orders from an ineligible commander in chief.
Every piece of legislation that Obama has signed since taking office would now be considered under law to be null and void.
Imagine what this would mean to the stock market, financial institutions, the auto industry, as well as every other facet of the American economy.
Not to mention, the people who already accuse the presidents critics of being racists will no doubt try to use this as their proof and stoke racial tensions to the point of riot.
Every appointment he has made, regardless if it was an appointment as a Czar, or a Cabinet-level position, would have to be overturned, and it would become the duty of the Vice-President to re-fill those positions.
Which leads to perhaps the most intriguing scenario of all.
The Constitution states that if the President is unable to serve, the Vice-President shall assume the duties of the office.
However, if the man who chose you to be his running mate was found to have been elected to the office in violation of Constitutional law, where does that leave you Mr. Biden?
After all, we (well, some of you poor misguided individuals) voted for the two of you as a team running on the same ticket.
So if it is found that the man who picked you to be his running mate did so in direct violation of federal law, doesnt it follow that you were also elected to the Vice-Presidency under false pretenses?
Barack Obama. CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!
When the U.S. military accepts the claim of a soldier that the man posing as Commander-In-Chief has failed to produce his eligibility to hold that title, we may be on the verge of seeing change beyond belief.
okay...I will...I’m watching the Market as we speak...
Carter is in Santa Ana I believe.
Been Hidin' or Zer0Bambi, What the difference?
...both have (proven) Hatred for America and its Enterprise system.
What are you smoking?
It was not a certificate of live birth it was a certification of live birth.
Certifications were given to those born outside the state.
Certificats were given to those with documented births inside the state.
The very fact that he put a certification on the web is proof enough by itself that he was not born in Hawaii.
John
Only the “usual” cities would riot and burn. LA, Detroit, DC, the south side of Chicago. Would we really miss them? It could be seen as a way of ending urban blight once and for all.
“Wishful thinking on my part, of course. ;)”
... and mine too.
Every piece of legislation that Obama has signed since taking office would now be considered under law to be null and void.
Not to mention the executive orders
There is no such thing as "votes for Obama/Biden". There were votes for Obama as President. There were votes for Biden as Vice President. End of discussion, even if the idiotic Birther conspiracy theory had any validity to begin with.
true but Biden first act would be to officially sign them in. not like they are going away.
Would they not have to go through the legislative process again as the time for a legitimate signature was passed, causing a pocket veto of each thing Obama signed?
Forget the birth certificate... Go after the Social Security Number issue!!!!!! Dr Taitz PI found evidence O has used up to 39 different social security numbers, the one most frequently used being borrowed from some guy in CT who would now be 119 years old. HELLLLLLOOOOO thats identity theft and social security numbers leave lots of paper trails that would be much more difficult to clean up than a BC.
________________________________________
I keep coming back to this.
This is INSANE that he could get away with this without being investigated.
Orly has proof re; SS numbers on her website.
.
Paging Mr. Quixote... Mr. Don Quixote... We have some windmills that need locating....
Perhaps someone has a source for the truth of this declaration.
Leni
The only alternative which would allow for McCain/Palin to take the Presidency would be for SCOTUS to rule that 1) the electoral college results are not valid and 2) a re-vote of the college is necessary and 3) the electors are not allowed to vote for Obama / Biden and 4) McCain / Palin elector’s hold together in their votes and finally 5) the dem electors split their vote between potential candidates and a few cross over.
In short, only the slimiest remotest wildest possibility could result in McCain/Palin based upon the prior election.
More likely that SCOTUS would invalidate the election results of all states and force a re-election but I think that is even a remote possibility.
Originally, didn’t the Constitution mandate that the second-highest vote getter become Vice President? What was the reason for changing that system - anyone know?
If I didn’t think Mark Levin would dismiss the question from the caller, it would be great if a Freeper could pose the question on his show - Mark’s quite the Constitutional expert and if anyone would know the most likely scenario, he would. But I don’t think he really wants to open the issue up for discussion, although he’s made snide reference from time to time, in passing.
Joseph Biden, natural-born US citizen, (well) over 35 years of age, inhabitant of Delaware for the past 14 years, received the votes of 365 properly chosen Electors for Vice-President of the United States, and these votes were properly counted by a special Joint Session of Congress on January 5, 2009 with Richard Cheney of Wyoming in the chair. Biden's election as Vice-President of the United States was then certified by that session, and signed by Cheney.
His election as Vice President has NOTHING TO DO WITH OBAMA, and if Obama is no longer President, Biden will assume the office.
not sure...but we do KNOW that that “Certification of Live Birth” is BOGUS...last I checked, we didn't have Microsoft software in 1961 which is what was used to produce that “document.” LOL
as far as “is the fact that a child does not have to be born in Hawaii in order for the state to issue such a document to the childs parents.” I just don't know for sure. You'd have to do some more digging...I “think” others have but I don't recall the determination...
Nope. A natural born citizen is born to at least one citizen parent — in Washington DC, in Hawaii, in Panama, in Kenya, or on the Moon.
Don’t think so...the case here in CA has to do with Hussein’s eligibility to be POTUS.
You can get more info on Orly Taitzs website.(attorney for Major Cook
_______________
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
I’m watching the Market now but if you go to Orly’s website and wnd.com you can get a lot of info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.