bama lied,
and jobs died
Posted on 07/15/2009 11:24:16 AM PDT by balls
Major Cook has been fired from his civilian defense contractor job. See details at link.
Spok, it is hard to give credence to the lack of information about Obama’s past, though it is undoubtedly suspicious. The more important issue, and one stressed in most of the lawsuits involving military officers, is that every officer swears to protect the constitution. Obama was in-your-face about not meeting the absolutely clear statement by our first chief justice, John Marshall, defining a natural born citizen has having two citizen parents. The reasons have to do with allegiance. Our president’s allegiance is to a British/Kenyan Marxist father. Find and read Marshall’s decision on “The Venus†from 1816. There are dozens of other references among court cases. Read Patrick Leahy’s Senate Res. 511., 2008. Obama does not feel bound by the constitution, and won’t be unless we demand that our legal system observe and protect the constitution. Some of us still have jobs, and many are too busy to investigate the truth of assertions about Obama’s eligibility. Many of those in the military are putting their lives on the line, and already seeing both cuts in defense programs, and some very troubling engagement orders. If my commander in chief would risk my life and country for a foreign idealogy, and I include Marxism, I like to think I’d act too.
Found it...thanks. (I need to go put my contact in!)
“how could he take orders and work in a normal military environment on a daily basis”
You make a good point, but I would also remind you that as a soldier he has sworn to uphold the constitution of the united states, not obey the commander and chief.
What is Jim Thompson’s opinion on this?
DOD RETALIATION AGAINST MR. COOK IS SWIFT AND BRUTAL
Moreover, however, retaliation has occurred or begun against Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook for the exercise of his First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances and Plaintiff Cook accordingly here seeks an injunction against the continuance or full implementation of this official governmental retaliation or in the alternative for a writ of mandamus, order to show cause, or rule nisi be issued to the Department of Defense commanding it to cease, cure, or remedy all retaliation against Plaintiff Cook. The circumstances are as follows:
Late on Tuesday afternoon, July 14, 2009, at around about 4:30 pm, Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook returned a call to an unknown telephone call from (813) 828-5884 and was told that his services were no longer required in Afghanistan and that he need not report for duty. In addition Plaintiff an e-mail with the revocation order attached from Master Sargent Miguel Matos (Exhibit C). Upon receipt of the revocation, Plaintiff Major Cook called his civilian boss, the CEO of Simtech, Inc., a closely held corporation that does DOD contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Plaintiff Major was employed until taking a Military Leave of Absence on Friday July 10, 2009, a senior systems engineer and architect, in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan. (Plaintiff has five Cisco Systems certifications in information technology dating from 2000 and just recertified in June 2009 for the Cisco Certified Design Expert qualification exam.)
The CEO of Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, explained to Plaintiff over a series of four conversations within the next two hours, that he had been terminated. Grice told the Plaintiff that he would no longer be welcome in his former position at SOCOM but that Grice wanted to see whether he could find something within the company (Simtech, Inc.) for Cook. The upshot was that at this time Grice did not have anything for Plaintiff to do. Grice told Plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become “nutty and crazy”, and that Plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position.
Grice explained that he had been in touch with Defense Security Services (an agency of the Department of Defense[1], with regional offices located in SOCOM Headquarters at McDill Airforce Base in Tampa, Florida), and that DSS had not yet made a determination whether Plaintiff Major Cook’s clearances would be pulled, but Grice made clear to Cook that it was DSS who had compelled Cook’s termination. Essentially, because of the “nutty and crazy” situation and the communications received from DSS was no longer employable by him at all. So he was not optimistic about getting me another job at the company. Grice also reported to Plaintiff that there was some gossip that “people were disappointed in” the Plaintiff because they thought he was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes. Grice then discussed Plaintiff’s expectation of receiving final paychecks (including accrued leave pay) already owed, without any severance pay, and wished the Plaintiff well.
A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. What has happened in the present case of Stefan Frederick Cook is that a federal agency appears to have taken action against Stefan Frederick Cook’s private employer, Simtech, Inc., which is a closely held corporation owned and operated by members of a single family, who are as much victims of the Department of Defense’ heavy-handed interference with Plaintiff Cook’s private-sector employment as is Plaintiff Cook himself.
bama lied,
and jobs died
Not a bit different than the Soviets. Consider all the professionals who’s services were no longer needed. They wandered about dejected and outcast. The ruling class had so successfully created a rift between the haves and the have nots with class envy that the populus considered the professionals as having gotten what they deserve.
What would you do if you were willing to stand by your principles but instead of threatening you they threatened someone you love who is innocent? What would you do? What would you do?
Communism is here! Putin must have been mentoring B. Hussein Obama during his recent trip to Russia.
You can have that so long as I get the tar, feathers, and rail concessions...
my bad, thread juggling and I read this one insufficiently and did something unheard of in freeperland. I posted a comment with less than a full grasp of all the issues.
Needs to get a speaking tour set up.
Um, no.
Just because we may not be able to prevent it does not mean we are allowing it.
You lost yours too?
He’s going to get rich on “whistleblower” laws.
You can have the rails. Darks has the tar and feathers concession.
*snort*
(27) However, Barack Hussein Obama, in order to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as President, basically needs only produce a single unique historical document for the Plaintiff’s inspection and authentication: namely, the “long-form” birth certificate which will confirm whether Barack Hussein Obama was in fact born to parents who were both citizens of the United States in Honolulu, Hawaii, in or about 1961. It is no answer to show the short-form birth certificate which has no seals and is signed by no one and is produced, as most birth-certificates are, by computerized reproduction.
My Buddy, a fellow Freeper, just told me that he wants to send Major Cook a check for $1,000 to help support him and his family during this fight. Any one know how to contact him?
*looking fearfully skyward for lightning bolts*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.