Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We're still wondering.. (the Muslim murderer -even Politico gets it)
Politico ^ | 6-2-09 | Politico Staff

Posted on 06/03/2009 6:57:05 AM PDT by STARWISE

..why the White House didn't put out a statement responding to the shooting at a military recruitment center Monday.

Doesn't that clash a little with their response to the killing of Dr. George Tiller?

...how much Republicans are willing to put on the line to slow Sotomayor's confirmation process - and whether the White House has active plans to undermine opposition. How big a fight would Obama pick to get Sotomayor confirmed by August, rather than in September?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abdulmuhammad; americanjihadist; arkansas; carlosbledsoe; cicdoesntcare; military; muslimshooter; obama; obamaappeaser; obamatruthfile; soniasotomayor; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
ARKANSAS' LONE JIHADIST: HOW ALONE IS HE? - By Walid Phares

Excerpt:

In an armed attack outside the Army-Navy Career Center which handles recruiting, in Little Rock, AR, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, 23, killed one soldier wounded another.

Muhammad, an American citizen who is a convert to Islam and previously known as Carlos Bledsoe, already had been under investigation by the FBI at the time of the shootings. He had traveled to Yemen, received indoctrination from radical clerics, according to a watch group, and possessed a false Somali passport.

He was charged in the death of Pvt. William Long, 23, while a prosecutor said Muhammad admitted shooting Long and another soldier "because of what they had done to Muslims in the past."

Here we have a new case of an individual U.S. citizen who committed an act of terror in the name of his ideology (Government officials have called it inaccurately a "political and religious motive") against U.S. military targets.

Do we see a pattern here? Are we witnessing a repeat and copycats?

In fact, as we review several previous cases, from the Miami cell case, to the Fort Dix Six, the Georgia two, the New York Four, the Virginia Paintball network, and many other cases, we're witnessing the surge of a phenomenon we have been warning about.

I have repeatedly coined it Mutant Jihad, including in my book Future Jihad.

Two important elements are to be taken into consideration: One is the fact that in many of these cases, U.S. military personnel and targets have been on the short list of these "homegrown terrorists."

If you study the repeated targeting process of these urban Jihadists, they systematically focus on military deployment inside the United States. In a sense, even as the perpetrators are separate, dispersed, and not connected, their targeting seems war-like: attacking the enemy's forces on the homeland.

The second element to be taken into consideration is the clear fact that in all these cases, without exception, we're seeing one ideology: Jihadism. Despite various levels of understanding and sophistication, the cells and lone wolves who were involved in the terror acts, legitimized their action under the label of "Jihad."

In several media interviews and defense and security workshops conducted over the past few years and months, I've made the case for the existence of a "force" behind these activities, pushing the Jihadi agenda and indoctrinating the "militants" into "fighting elements."

As I studied the cases and compared them to each other, I found out that in each one case, there is a "clicking moment." Several U.S. and European legislators asked me about defining the "clicking moment" where a militant becomes a terrorist.

My answer has been and continues to be:

once one is indoctrinated into Jihadism, the mutation into a terrorist is at the discretion of the militant. We need to stop the terrorists at the indoctrination level.

~~~~

SAME DEAD EYES ...

Pathetic, Obama! I wrote to the White House, stating the need to express outrage at this slaughter ... he's the CIC! I urge all to do the same.

White House contact

1 posted on 06/03/2009 6:57:06 AM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; All

Amazon Book Review:
"Vastly Illuminating!" September 25, 2004
By Kat Bakhu

"I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.

It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.

Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.

This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air."
$27.00
http://www.amazon.com/Unholy-Alliance-Radical-Islam-American/dp/089526076X

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left -by David Horowitz
Not all dissent is equal, and Americans whose actions are calculated to give aide and comfort to the butchers who murdered 3,000 innocent people on September 11, 2001 are not patriotic at all... they are, in fact, quite the opposite.

$18.00 from David Horowitz's website, FrontPageMag.com:
(click on either of the two books shown in the column on the left side of the page to get to his 'book store' section)
http://frontpagemag.com/

2 posted on 06/03/2009 6:58:55 AM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; BulletBobCo; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

~~PING!

God bless and protect our brave military.


3 posted on 06/03/2009 6:59:27 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It’s simple enough: The White House doesn’t want to offend Muslims. Will eonough noise be made so that they have to reverse their position? I guess we’ll have to see, but I doubt it.


4 posted on 06/03/2009 6:59:59 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

When will the media REPORT we were attacked the other day via a terrorist via the recruiting shooting?

The abortion doctor killer was a militiaman and not part of a Christian anti-abortion group, has the media lost interest in the story? The story has already disappeared from the "top stories" section of the MSM pages!

It seems like the media were all over the story until it was learned that the murderer was not part of a Christian group. Now they don't seem so interested anymore.

The recruiting shooting is being ignored. Anybody else notice this?


5 posted on 06/03/2009 7:00:31 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
SAME DEAD EYES------------------------------- ------------------------------------------0--
6 posted on 06/03/2009 7:01:00 AM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

It’s simple enough,
the occupant of the White House IS a Muslim,

and plans to use people like the Black Panthers as his own personal secret police enforcement squads.


7 posted on 06/03/2009 7:01:40 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
"In fact, conversion by itself isn't the front issue but studying Jihadism under radical ideologues is the stage where individuals turn into Jihadi militants, regardless of their affiliation with a group or a conspiracy. Which brings us to law enforcement’s understanding of what we're dealing with.

According to AP, a U.S. local official said: "Muhammad was not part of any terrorist group, nor was his attack part of a larger conspiracy." But is this relevant?

If anything, this is evidence that some official does not understand that Jihadi terrorists aren't necessarily part of a terrorist group and or of a vast conspiracy.

This is a new type of threat which is penetrating the United States that we need to be aware of.

Similarly, a local official told AP: "We believe that it's associated with his disagreement over the military operations."

This is further evidence that authorities may not comprehend the true motives of the Jihadists.

It is not about "disagreement over military operations." It is about indoctrination of individual U.S. citizens or residents to turn them against their own society for a much larger purpose."

8 posted on 06/03/2009 7:02:38 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The white house response will be a smart ass remark from gibbs.........nothing else.

The real response should be a gallows and a hanging on prime time.

Until we are proactive we will be victims.......Obama and his handlers love victims, they are easily ruled.

9 posted on 06/03/2009 7:03:07 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Indeed. Taking everything as a whole, I don’t know how much more clearer it could be.


10 posted on 06/03/2009 7:04:52 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The contrast between the attack-dog “reporting” of the Tiller shooting and the sugar-coated non-reporting of the Little Rock attack could not be starker. I wonder what force of fate scheduled these two events for consecutive days. They offer, among other things, a case study in media bias.


11 posted on 06/03/2009 7:07:00 AM PDT by jay1949 (Work is the curse of the blogging class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I haven’t followed the daily press conferences at the White House- I wonder if anyone in the press even asked Gibbs about this?

It seems Obama is unwilling to make a statement of any kind about this- he’s in the Middle East after all- and doesn’t want to offend the muslims he’s going to court.

Imagine what a GI thinks watching this all unfold..


12 posted on 06/03/2009 7:07:12 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
The media lost interest in Tiller's killer the moment that his bio surfaced. He is a dysfunctional mental case loner who had been diagnosed a schizophrenic. (See Lifesite.net) Telling that ruins their goal of making prolifers pay and pay again for Tiller's death.

A Mooslim terrorist attacks US military in the middle of the country, and 0 can't express his true feelings about it in public. Part of his program of “transparency” doncha know.

13 posted on 06/03/2009 7:07:59 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The White House doesn’t want to offend Muslims.

It may be more simple than that....Isn't the penalty for a convert from Islam death? Wasn't BHO once one of them and now a convert?

If there was a truly open discussion about the subject bHo would truly have a target on his back....Just another groups he must appease.

14 posted on 06/03/2009 7:08:38 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

My heart aches for our troops ... their CIC, fergodssakes!


15 posted on 06/03/2009 7:08:50 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Why can’t he be tried for treason? - a legal reason not a political reason please. Thank you.


16 posted on 06/03/2009 7:11:20 AM PDT by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

From obama’s actions and words the conclusion is that he shares the same belief system of tiller and of the muslum terrorist who gunned down two innocent soldiers. God Help the United States.


17 posted on 06/03/2009 7:11:33 AM PDT by jesseam (Been there and done that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Mapping the “climate of hate” (Tiller vs. American Muslim Beast by Michelle Malkin)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2263722/posts


18 posted on 06/03/2009 7:13:04 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Looks like the corrupt american media is too busy playing with Obama’s dog to report on this or the potential missle miss of an airplane near Houston...(cue GIANT EYE ROLL)

Bo visits W.H. reporters
By AMIE PARNES | 06/02/09 9:08 PM

Earlier: Bo—tennis ball in mouth—made an appearance minutes after POTUS took off on Marine One.

Reduce...Reporters and photographers played with the first dog and took pictures of him, too.

http://www.politico.com/politico44/


19 posted on 06/03/2009 7:13:11 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“Muhammad was not part of any terrorist group,....

Then what the hell was he doing in Yemen on a Sudanese passport?!?!?!
On a vacation?
Again, more media being the mouthpiece of the current administration. I am no longer calling it cluelessness, the MSM has willfully become the “MiniTruth”.


20 posted on 06/03/2009 7:13:55 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Minnesota - You all can go to hell. I'm going to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson