According to AP, a U.S. local official said: "Muhammad was not part of any terrorist group, nor was his attack part of a larger conspiracy." But is this relevant?
If anything, this is evidence that some official does not understand that Jihadi terrorists aren't necessarily part of a terrorist group and or of a vast conspiracy.
This is a new type of threat which is penetrating the United States that we need to be aware of.
Similarly, a local official told AP: "We believe that it's associated with his disagreement over the military operations."
This is further evidence that authorities may not comprehend the true motives of the Jihadists.
It is not about "disagreement over military operations." It is about indoctrination of individual U.S. citizens or residents to turn them against their own society for a much larger purpose."
“Muhammad was not part of any terrorist group,....
Then what the hell was he doing in Yemen on a Sudanese passport?!?!?!
On a vacation?
Again, more media being the mouthpiece of the current administration. I am no longer calling it cluelessness, the MSM has willfully become the “MiniTruth”.
“Muhammad was not part of any terrorist group, nor was his attack part of a larger conspiracy.”
Oh, THAT’s rich. Radical islam, of which this guy is a part, is not considered a larger conspiracy with the goal of destroyed the United States?