Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New gun law aimed at asserting sovereignty
daily paul ^ | 4/16/09 | KAHRIN DEINES

Posted on 04/16/2009 3:58:48 PM PDT by Flavius

Gov. Brian Schweitzer has signed into law a bill that aims to exempt Montana-made guns from federal regulation, adding firepower to a battery of legislative efforts to assert states’ rights across the nation.

“It’s a gun bill, but it’s another way of demonstrating the sovereignty of the state of Montana,” Democrat Schweitzer said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailypaul.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; banglist; iran; shallnotbeinfringed; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Flavius

Despite a full-court press by the media to ignore and/or ridicule the issue, there is both a huge effort by the current government to expand their powers far beyond what they already were, and a lot of citizens who do not care for it at all.

That said, I am pessimistic about the eventual outcome.


21 posted on 04/16/2009 5:04:43 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

That depends on whether you’re talking to the Montanans or the Feds.


22 posted on 04/16/2009 5:09:22 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: manc

I’m still waiting on AL to shift their butts. *sigh*


23 posted on 04/16/2009 5:18:23 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The smallest minority on earth is the 'individual'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Now we need to get a bunch of mfgs to move their production to MT.


24 posted on 04/16/2009 5:24:37 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

“Gov. Brian Schweitzer has signed into law a bill that aims to exempt Montana-made guns from federal regulation...”

Oh my...when Holder finds out he’s going to $h-t a purple Twinkie right there during his daily staff briefing.

Also, would this action mean that the Governor of Montana is now on Napalitano’s DHS rightwing extremist watch list?

...just asking...


25 posted on 04/16/2009 5:31:19 PM PDT by Towed_Jumper (Stephen Hopkins: Founding Father who had Cerebral Palsy.."My hand trembles, my heart does not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal
I wonder what would happen if small arms were outlawed and cities decided to deputize their citizens to get around the gun laws. The federal government could pressure any manufacturers into staying out of Montana. They could stop federal contracts and withhold funds to other countries that buy weapons from the manufacturer around the world.
26 posted on 04/16/2009 5:39:44 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Obama is a wimp!

The Liberal Messiah already caved regarding California's act of State Nullification towards the Controlled Substances Act and Gonzales v. Raich. It will be hard for Him to do otherwise towards Montana's State Nullification in this case.

27 posted on 04/16/2009 5:44:12 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ditto h
here is a quick link i found
28 posted on 04/16/2009 5:47:51 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If the Average nObama Voter is Antyhing Like Peggy Joseph, The Next 4 Years Will Be A Hoot!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Part of the deal is the weapons don’t leave the state, else they become subject to federal laws.

Makes sense. We need a flurry of states to enact similar laws. There will be 'them' and 'us' states.
29 posted on 04/16/2009 5:49:41 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

Many times, the Dems in Montana are a lot better than most of the Republicans we have in the Northeast.


30 posted on 04/16/2009 6:28:12 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ditto h
So where can I get a Montana built semi automatic?

IIRC, they are going to manufacture and sell only 20 of these particular Fed exempt guns, and part of the deal is that they don't leave the state of MT.

31 posted on 04/16/2009 6:36:54 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If Liberals would pay their taxes, there would be no deficit..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
"They could stop federal contracts and withhold funds to other countries that buy weapons from the manufacturer around the world. "

Yep! Overlooked that small detail...{:-(

32 posted on 04/16/2009 6:43:48 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: manc

I haven’t heard anything on a sovereignty bill for Florida. Even if, by some strange quirk the legislature passed it, what are the chances Charlie Crist would actually sign it? I did a quick search of the official site and didn’t find it, but I’ll spend a little more time on it. I was curious about it myself...


33 posted on 04/16/2009 7:02:07 PM PDT by tstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: manc

Charline Crist is a panty waisted wimp.

People also go crazy about “automatic” rifles or fully automatic.

Anyone in the military or a gun owner knows that a semi-auto rifle in capable hands beats “spray and pray” automatic. At full auto you burn through ammo rapidly. In addition, the barrel can heat up and the gun becomes almost useless.


34 posted on 04/16/2009 7:11:15 PM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tstarr

[;ease thank you so much and if you do find anything then please let me know if you get a chance and have time as I really would love to know about this


35 posted on 04/16/2009 7:42:04 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

i thought the commerce clause was for trade between states... if you aren’t selling it why is that subject to federal laws...

take up residence for a week, buy it, move out.

seems legit to me.
t


36 posted on 04/16/2009 9:36:53 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper
Also, would this action mean that the Governor of Montana is now on Napalitano’s DHS rightwing extremist watch list?

Somebody said something like "In a society that imprisons honest men, the only place for an honest man is in prison." I thought it was Voltaire, but I can't find a cite.

37 posted on 04/16/2009 9:44:03 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

There was a case years ago in which a Fed ruling was that even if a crop like corn were grown in a state, and it was intended to be sold and consumed in the state, that it could still be transported across state lines, therefore the crop was covered by the commerce clause. I have no doubt with these present courts that some Fed judge will come up with the same reasoning about a gun made in the State of Montana.


38 posted on 04/16/2009 9:54:52 PM PDT by Enterprise (Hey Pirates - you got yer asses kicked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

A previous poster mentioned the Supreme Court case “Wickard v. Filburn” under FDR. The Court found against a farmer growing wheat on his own land to feed his own cattle! Here’s a link :
http://www.conservapedia.com/Wickard_v._Filburn


39 posted on 04/17/2009 6:05:59 AM PDT by Bonneville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
This could be a double-edged sword.

States would be able to ban firearms under this legislation.

I wouldn't fall back to a position of states rights. The Second Amendment states the right to bear arms. The Constitution must be defended first.

40 posted on 04/17/2009 7:25:06 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson