Kentucky elections officer wants eligibility investigated

An official in the office of Kentucky's elections chief has referred to state Attorney General Jack Conway for investigation the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.

In a letter to Conway, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Leslie A. Fugate noted the issue of "President Barack Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot in Kentucky."

There was no immediate word on the status of any investigative work that might be launched by investigators for Conway, the 49th attorney general for Kentucky, who was elected in 2007 and has made targeting cybercrimes a priority.

If a formal investigation actually is begun it apparently would be the first time the many lawsuit plaintiffs across the country would see a door opening to some answers about the murky circumstances surrounding Obama's eligibility to be president.

Among the typical responses to eligibility challenges WND has reported was a federal judge's dismissal of a case because the issue already had been "twittered."

Further, lawyers hired to defend against such cases also have begun threatening sanctions against plaintiffs' lawyers unless they agree voluntarily to leave the issue of eligibility unquestioned.

"Because our office does not have investigative powers … we are referring the matter to your office," she wrote.

The letter followed a visit to elections officials by California attorney Orly Taitz, who is working through her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation on several court cases challenging Obama's eligibility.

A committee of concerned citizens accompanied Taitz to Fugate's office to ask that the eligibility issue be investigated.

And you are the one who IS genuine here?

ROTLFMAO! A genuine FOOL perhaps.

Get over yourself, or chill out and kiss my grits.

Never at any point have I suggested “setting aside” the Constitution, nor am I by a hellaciously long stretch, guilty of “ignoring the claims of the birthers”.

Arlen Specter - so far as I am concerned, the sooner he is unemployed, the better. He can go to hell...and you can bloody join him.

Sorry, you do not strike me...

as having the proper focus to accurately determine who IS and who is NOT - Conservative - based solely upon your subjective view of whether or not they set about achieving the goals of upholding the Constitution using YOUR approach.

And that is what it is all about, your argument.

You have not leveled a single claim against me that would stand up to scrutiny, except were you to assert that I was an advocate for being methodical, and doing as much as possible behind the scenes and below the radar for the longest time possible.

I advocate as stealthy approach as is possible for as long as reasonably possible (four years is too long - we do not have that long to act in order to preserve our constitutionally established representative republic from partial or total socialist destruction) because I believe it is necessary to achieve victory.

Why?

Flatly stated, because we have enemies foreign and domestic who oppose us. Our especial concern right now is those domestic enemies who are in the process of disassembling our structure of check-and-balance government.

They are the ones who will leave us vulnerable to our foreign enemies.

We have those domestic enemies in our midst - even among our conservative movement. They are working actively to sabotage our efforts.

I am not one of them - not in any way whatsoever.

At rallies and tea parties and protests, they will be the ones who are acting up, attempting things which violate the law (like trying to destroy public property, or inciting others around them to riot).

They will be the ones carrying signs reading [for example] “Kill a faggot for Jesus”, or “Death to Obama/Pelosi/Reid”. Anything they can do to associate us with extremism as it is portrayed by the manistream media, is what they will do.

They will also, of course, be trying mightily to identify individuals in positions of leadership and/or power within our midst, in order to isolate them, separate them from the group, attack and discredit them, find a means (legal or illegal) to immobilize them by freeaing their financial assets and/or detaining them indefinitely on some spurious charge(s).

They understand completely the chilling effect that this often has on opposition. They will do it with vengeful and wanton glee. It may inevitably happen to a few among us, but by exercising an intelligent strategy, we may together minimize the numbers and mitigate downward to nothingness any of their desired effects.

They will try to sabotage any initiative petition efforts by signing phony names and addresses to petitions in order to invalidate our labors out of hand. I believe that there is nothing they will NOT stoop to, because we are bound by morals and ethics, by an innate sense of honesty and fair play, while they are absolutely not.

They accuse us of every despicable behaviour under the sun, all the while doing exactly the same and worse behind closed doors. When publicly questioned, or presented with facts, they of course label us as “racists, sexists, bigots, and homophobes” - or “haters” in short.

Contrast the difference between the actual proven behaviours of Barney Frank (may he rot in hell) versus Senator Larry Craig of Idaho and the unfounded accusations made against him as a perfect example.

Why in hell is “Chappaquiddick Ted” Kennedy not only still serving in the US Senate, but getting lauded on a weekly basis for the last two decades?!?!

Their “prime mover” is the naked lust for power and control, and they do not care what they have to do to achieve it, exercise it, and hold it.

They do not believe they sould be held to account for the “perks of power” they enjoy while they misuse it.

They are insufferably arrogant, elitist snobs who believe they absolutely DO know better than you do how to run your life and spend your money, run my life and spend my money...ad infinitum, ad nauseum...

They are not qualified to be our “moral compass” any more than I am qualified to be yours, or you mine

I am not in the least bit acquainted with “Scottish law”. The only law which concerns me here is ANY/ALL of that which falls within the purview of the United States Constitution, as applied in an originalist manner without prejudice and without any imaginary “umbras” which lefties are so fond of finding.

My ultimate goal is to see “b.-’HO” either resign in disgrace under threat of impeachment and removal, or be forcibly removed from office based upon sound investigation and a mass of undeniable evidence presented in embarrassing breadth and depth with cold-eyed clarity in full public view.

Along with him, I want to see Vice President Biden and every cabinet appointee resign or be removed - even including SecDef. Gates., who is probably one of only two who are qualified for their position (the other possibly being Shinseki in Veterans’ Affairs - maybe).

If Pelosi and Reid have their fingerprints ANYWHERE in the whole mess, the full extent of their guilt ought to be exposed, and they should all be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, go to prison, serve full sentences, and NEVER, EVER be eligible for a position of public trust again.

The same goes for Hussein, Biden, and all who are legally culpable.

To achieve such an end, we have to cross every ‘T’, dot every ‘i’, all the way down the line. We have to understand that our opponents - our enemies - are already fully prepared to use the legal system against us.

They will twist, distort, coerce, extort, bribe, call in favors...the fight will have to be fought on an uneven playing field, and if we fail to recognize that, and have plans to counteract it, we put ourselves at greater risk.

The question is not whether to fight the battle or not, but how to fight the battle in order to win.

What is so wrong, or so hard to understand about that?

A.A.C.

Obviously there are none so blind as...

If you choose to see me as anything other than the hardcore capital’C’ Conservative that I am now, and have been for over 28 years (My first vote was in the general in 1980 for Ronald Reagan...) then it is your shortcoming, not mine.

I’m no FR newbie. All here (agree with me on a subject or not) who know me more than in passing say that my FR “handle” is accurate.

Those who know me in real life consider me the most Conservative person they know. My lib brother thinks I’m a stereotypical Conservative. He won’t even talk with me because of my Conservatism, and its sharp conflict with his liberalism.

If you’re so myopic you find fault with my pitching for a stealthy, strategic approach to succeed in toppling zer0bama from an office he hasn’t the skill, or the legal right to occupy, that’s not my prob.

Storming the beaches at Normandy and pushing the Germans back inland was urgent too, but there had to be a plan

{I think we have the same - or similar basic goals of bringing Conservative principles back to the forefront of leadership. Where we differ is on how to make it happen.}

I want his useless ass out of the WH and gone - along with every other traitor we can round up. Looking at him...listening to his moronic sound bites that say nothing, brings me to the point of puking, or breaking things.

You’re clearly not a strategist, probably not a strategic thinker.

No spittle, no “exposure”, only common sense. Uncommon for you, it seems. Nothing to “revert” to.

I am the Conservative I am (always have been) without need for your approval - earned my bona fides long ago.

I’ll leave you be, won’t bother to read/comment on your posts; you go do whatever...

My time is too important to waste on petty agent provocateurs like you.

A.A.C.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.