Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Stimulus Bill Explicitly Grants AIG the Legal Right to Give Unlimited Bonuses
ButAsForMe.com ^ | 03/17/09 | ButAsForMe

Posted on 03/17/2009 10:44:34 AM PDT by wrrock

http://www.butasforme.com/2009/03/17/obamas-stimulus-bill-explicitly-grants-aig-the-legal-right-to-hand-out-bonuses/

From page H1412 of the Final Stimulus Bill, ``SEC. 111. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:

"(iii) The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a writte employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, as such valid employment contracts are determined by the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary."

This amendment provides an exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009, which exempts the very AIG bonuses Obama is condemning every single chance he gets. The amendment is in the final version and is law.

Sen. Dodd was AIG’s largest single recipient of campaign donations during the 2008 election cycle with $103,100, according to opensecrets.org — According to the Wall Street Journal, Sen. Dodd placed this section into the final stimulus bill, making him responsible, along with Obama, for AIG receiving these bonuses.

(Excerpt) Read more at butasforme.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aig; animalfarm; bho44; bonuses; cultureofcorruption; democrats; democratscandals; dodd; first100days; obama; obamabreakspromises; obamaflipflops; obamalies; orwelliannightmare; porkulus; pravdamedia; smokeandmirrors; stalinisttactics; stimulus; worst100days
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: bronxboy

Voiding contracts by government fiat is the first break in the chain in the Rule of Law.

Voiding the Rule of Law is probably not conducive to either the economy or freedom. But it’s a great first step to despotism.

Be careful what you wish for. This manipulated outrage serves the One’s purpose.


81 posted on 03/17/2009 12:25:15 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Sending to Drudge.


82 posted on 03/17/2009 12:29:54 PM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

PING!!


83 posted on 03/17/2009 12:39:55 PM PDT by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucsonican

Tucsonican, the Govt SHOULD be able to set limits on comp when using our money (notice I didn’t say Govt $). But in the contract between the Govt and AIG it should be clearly stated that they have this ability.

If AIG says no, then the 2 can negotiate.

IMO, this is all political theater on both the Govt side and the Private Sector. AIG, GS, JPMorgan etc are all in bed with Congressional powers at be. Faux outrage is sickening.

I just get bent out of shape when posters here on FR are all too willing to make excuses for Wall St., as if it is part of being a conservative. No different than Dems who will never blame liberal Govt. no matter if facts or voting records expose them.


84 posted on 03/17/2009 12:46:58 PM PDT by roofgoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Thanks for posting this.

Also take a look at this.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2207793/posts

This whole thing seems planne from way back. Look at the list of sponsors. This didn’t just spring up 2 days ago ... this has been in the works a long time.

We’re being played.


85 posted on 03/17/2009 1:08:31 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
The truth is these executives should get their bonuses because there is a contract to give them the bonus

What does the bonus contract say? Lose a billion, get a million? Lose 100 billion, get 100 million?

86 posted on 03/17/2009 1:08:49 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: roofgoat
Nobody should make excuses for AIG, but neither should anyone excuse the government when it tries to manage an insurance company. The Secretary of the Treasury gave AIG billions of dollars because he wanted the company to keep meeting its obligations. Those obligations included tens of billions of dollars owed to foreign banks and about 170 million owed to AIG employees. If we didn't care that the company continue operating the government could have let it declare bankruptcy. Then the banks, both foreign and domestic, and the employees could have lined up to collect whatever they could strip off the carcass in the bankruptcy proceeding.

As it is we've kept the company afloat and there is no reason why we should be funding payments to profligate banks but not to foolish employees. If it is outrageous to save anyone from the consequences of an AIG collapse then the payments to counterparties on credit default swaps are at least a thousand times more outrageous than the bonuses.

This bonus business is just misdirection. The Obamunists want you to obsess about the minor outrage so that you will forget about the big one. Keep your eye on the shell with the pea under it.

87 posted on 03/17/2009 1:12:35 PM PDT by fluffdaddy (Is anyone else missing Fred Thompson about now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

This was typical pay for play. After Obama got his 100G check from AIG, he signed the stimulust bill into law with the language AIG needed to ensure their bonuses would be paid.


88 posted on 03/17/2009 1:13:42 PM PDT by Spokane (Yeehaw! Change has come to Washington! Free money for everyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluffdaddy

I agree with what you wrote. But if you read what I have written in my last 2 posts, I clearly stated that this was all Political Theater for the masses and both Pres/Congress AND Wall St. are all laughing.


89 posted on 03/17/2009 1:26:51 PM PDT by roofgoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

bttt


90 posted on 03/17/2009 1:32:24 PM PDT by 1035rep ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
It's simply a political ploy. Take wads of money from companies like AIG, bail them out while protecting the pay of those who fed you money, then raise hell and stomp your feet at how unfair it is when it comes time for the bonus pay.

At this point, you drag a few execs in front of Congress, wag a stern finger at them, do nothing substantive so as to ensure they still get paid their bonus, and then everybody can laugh about it together in a few months at some DC cocktail party paid for by the suckers paying everybody's salary.

God Bless America.

91 posted on 03/17/2009 1:37:16 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

I tell you NONE of them read it..... These Idiots are the most incompetent group in government ever....

Next thing you know a bunch of Trial Lawyers will be represting AIG against the government (the taxpayers) and we wont get a penny of our money back...

Obama the train is off the track, Please resign immediately and take Plugs Biden with ya.


92 posted on 03/17/2009 1:55:11 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (We are living in The Night Of The Obama Zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
I guess he should have had someone READ the bill before he signed it. Suckered. Rove’s invisible hand?

Translation:

0bama!

You absolute FUBAR!

You didn't read the bill!

93 posted on 03/17/2009 2:06:16 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Glenn Beck doing a great job on this right now.


94 posted on 03/17/2009 2:12:48 PM PDT by Carley (President Obama Dropped a MOAB on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

To discover that AIG gave out bonuses with bailout money is as shocking as finding out that people are using Food Stamps and welfare money to buy booze, cigarettes and lottery tickets.


95 posted on 03/17/2009 2:17:34 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roofgoat
Tucsonican, the Govt SHOULD be able to set limits on comp when using our money (notice I didn’t say Govt $). But in the contract between the Govt and AIG it should be clearly stated that they have this ability.

It isn't unusual at all for the government to put restrictions on how taxpayer funds are expended. In fact, it's prudent to do so and, as a taxpayer, I expect my representatives to take such a stance EVERY time they hand some of my money to someone I don't know. However, these restrictions are supposed to be in place BEFORE the money goes out the door. Such was not the case with this current so called "scandal".

I'm not here to make excuses for AIG or anyone else. They all did their fair share of stupid stuff. What I AM here for is to make sure that all this hyperventilation over these bonuses doesn't create MORE problems.

When we allow government to dictate specific compensation for a private sector firms we're setting a pretty bad precedent.

When we allow the government to take measures such as they are proposing once the horse is already out of the barn we're just being vindictive and that helps nobody.

When we allow such measures without acknowledging that this wouldn't even have been an issue if the people that were DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the care of their charge wantonly and frivolously disbursed taxpayer funds without proper restraints in place we are hiding our heads in the sand as the spectre of a "planned economy" looms above us!

When we allow the government to make a huge issue out of these bonuses when we're talking about less than 1/100th of a percent of the total money these thieving, incompetent, self dealing barbarians in congress have doled out we're being played for suckers.

96 posted on 03/17/2009 2:31:40 PM PDT by Tucsonican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: RC2
If the bonuses were legal, they can’t do a thing about it. Other than make a lot of noise.

Yeah...until some poor basta&d gets killed for simply working at AIG. This is how Hitler ramped up the anger in pre-war Germany that lead to Krystalnacht. Every tyrant needs a whipping boy...welcome to Brack's America.

97 posted on 03/17/2009 3:05:27 PM PDT by JrsyJack (ct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
Atlas Puked...
98 posted on 03/17/2009 3:26:59 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucsonican; All
I expect my representatives to take such a stance EVERY time they hand some of my money to someone I don't know.

I agree in principle, although obviously that's hard to do when they don't even bother to read bills they pass. I think "our" government should stop all bailouts until they at least understand exactly what the bailee's liabilities are (all of the liabilities) and what the bailee can do with the money.

Looks like good old hypocrite Christopher Dodd went beyond just being negligent: Link: Congressional lawmakers are scrambling to think up creative ways to recover at least some of the $165 million in bonuses that bailed-out American International Group is paying executives -- but they could be their own worst enemy. Though Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., is among those leading the charge on retrieving the bonuses, an amendment he added to the $787 billion stimulus bill last month created a roadblock to getting that money back.

In any case, looks like the Dodds' attempt to tax the bonus money is unconstitutional. He may know that but wants to grandstand until this tempest blows over:

The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3 provides that: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law will be passed."

"Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences, in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more-industrious and less-informed part of the community." James Madison, Federalist Number 44, 1788.

Meanwhile:


99 posted on 03/17/2009 3:54:28 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
Thus we can stop the bonuses or make AIG get them back

WE? speak for yourself and the liberals. The government has no business deciding who gets paid and how much in a private company. The government shouldn't have been giving them money anyway. But even so AIG can claim the source of the bonus money is not from the feds but incoming revenues.

100 posted on 03/17/2009 4:35:59 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson