Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Cannot Be President: Obama is Disqualified by the Known Unknowns
Canada Free Press ^ | November 12, 2008 | Dr. Robert B. Coambs

Posted on 03/14/2009 2:50:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

(1) At the time of the November 4 election, Obama’ eligibility was unknown to the majority of the American electorate. That is, the vast majority of the American electorate did not know whether Obama was eligible to become the President of the United States (POTUS).

Furthermore Obama’s eligibility remains unknown, even to Americans who are very interested in this question, and have inquired deeply into it. When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence. Thus, the US citizenry did not know on November 4 if Obama was eligible, and they still do not know.

(2) Among the US citizenry are the following: The current POTUS The current VPOTUS & President of the Senate The US Supreme Court The US Congress The Senior Staff of the Pentagon The Senior Staff of the Federal Elections Commission The Members of the Electoral College

To best of my knowledge, none of these individuals have officially and publicly declared Obama to be eligible to be POTUS. They have not produced or provided sufficient evidence to prove this eligibility.

(3) The news media, television, radio, and the Internet transmit huge amounts of information each day. However, to the best of my knowledge the eligibility of Obama to be POTUS is not known by the general public (See Note 1).

Method of formal logic (4) Until and if that dissemination occurs, there is a method of formal logic that can be applied to this situation. It is called the Categorical Syllogism, and was described by Aristotle (Prior Analytics, 24b18-20). Ordinarily, a categorical syllogism is simply called a syllogism, as I shall do here.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: barackobama; berg; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; communistpunk; congress; democrats; democratscandals; doublestandard; eligibility; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orly; orlytaitz; scotus; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last
To: Revolting cat!

How would you like to be chosen to make that document?
You would be wearing cement shoes right after handing the document to him.Little blip in the news about a printer found submerged in the river wearing Herman Munsters boots.


61 posted on 03/14/2009 4:23:07 PM PDT by xero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom
You have a source for that? I'd love to see it.

To my understanding the statement was made by a defense attorney in the NC eligibility case, Sullivan v. Marshall, that was brought by Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan against NC Secretary Of State Elain Marshall. The case has since been dismissed on lack of standing.

62 posted on 03/14/2009 4:24:15 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Obama references court rules that say he does not have to grant “discovery” prior to Court hearings, if embarrassment or other factors were involved.

Yeah, it sure would be embarrassing if he couldn't produce documents showing he was a natural born citizen, wouldn't it?

63 posted on 03/14/2009 4:25:46 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Indeed.  The parallels are ... interesting.

I like your tag line, too.

64 posted on 03/14/2009 4:28:52 PM PDT by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

II. Discussion
Rule 26(c)(1) authorizes the Court to enter a protective order to protect a party
“from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” including an
order forbidding the discovery or specifying terms for discovery. “While the court should
not automatically stay discovery because a motion to dismiss has been filed, ‘a stay is
proper where the likelihood that such motion may result in a narrowing or an outright
elimination of discovery outweighs the likely harm to be produced by the delay.’” 19th
St. Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345, 349 (E.D. Pa. 2000),
quoting Weisman v. Mediq, Inc., 1955 WL 273678, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5900 *2 (E.D.
Pa. 1995). “Where a pending motion to dismiss may dispose of the entire action and
where discovery is not needed to rule on such motion, the balance generally favors
granting a motion to stay.” Weisman, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *5.


The above is found in Obama’s response in one of the lawsuits demanding documents.

All Court filings from Berg and Obama can be found at this website:

http://www.obamacrimes.info/


65 posted on 03/14/2009 4:29:13 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

inquiring minds want to know...

minds full of mush dont.


66 posted on 03/14/2009 4:29:32 PM PDT by Former MSM Viewer ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

USURPER. That’s why this “presidency” is “historic”. Fuhrer Obama is the biggest scammer EVER.


67 posted on 03/14/2009 4:31:26 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty (Democrats are bastard coated bastards with bastard filling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
As a practical matter, I do not believe we can force Obama out of office over this, alone.

I see. Which qualification would you prefer he be thrown out on? Maybe he is really 34 years old, would that be a good enough reason or is it that this Natural Born issue is too complicated so we should just set that aside. Is that what your really trying to say?

68 posted on 03/14/2009 4:33:07 PM PDT by this is my country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Comments?

“Syllogisms: a logical scheme of a formal argument of a major and minor premise and a conclusion which MUST be true if the premise is true.”

“The conclusion of this syllogism is self-evident because it merely requires the combination of two correct premises to produce a correct conclusion.”

“The syllogism is compelling, omnipresent, and transcendent in time.”

“Major Premise: To be POTUS, the candidates eligibility must be publicly known.

Minor Premise: Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known.”

All of Obama’s records, including COLB, have been sealed.

“This syllogism responds only to rules of deductive logic and cannot be overturned by any human action. If the premises are taken to be true, then the conclusion must be true.”

According to the laws of logic and reason, and the laws of the universe, Obama is not POTUS...

69 posted on 03/14/2009 4:36:16 PM PDT by Semper Mark (Communism is Socialism with a gun to your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Yes he is President get over it as much as it sucks no one has the eggs to do anything about it short of a coup or civil war that’s all folks

And you pulled your head out of the sand to post this?

70 posted on 03/14/2009 4:44:46 PM PDT by Misterioso (Obama was elected not in spite of his color but because of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01; Sequoyah101; EDINVA
Look up "rope-a-dope"...
71 posted on 03/14/2009 4:45:52 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: xero

He’ll outsource the making of his “real, authentic” long birth certificate to North Korea. They’ve got real authentic experts there. Some of the dollar bills in your wallet might have traveled from them.


72 posted on 03/14/2009 4:48:55 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]



I won !!!
73 posted on 03/14/2009 4:49:09 PM PDT by razbinn (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]



Obama's birth certificate found!!!
74 posted on 03/14/2009 4:49:48 PM PDT by razbinn (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

NO sane person would spend almost a million to cover up these documents if they were indeed qualified to be POTUS.


75 posted on 03/14/2009 4:50:10 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; LucyT

Pinger


76 posted on 03/14/2009 4:52:28 PM PDT by stockpirate ("the imposition of socialist tyranny will produce the enslavement of conscience, " Alan Keyes 09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
II. Discussion Rule 26(c)(1) authorizes the Court to enter a protective order to protect a party “from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” including an order forbidding the discovery or specifying terms for discovery.

I do not read from this that Obama through his filings claims to be trying to avoid embarrassment. It could be one or more of the things listed, but not necessarily all of them at once (IANAL).

77 posted on 03/14/2009 5:08:41 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Markos33

The problem is that Major Premise.


78 posted on 03/14/2009 5:09:04 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Totally right on...this is still a valid qualification standard that must not be left standing with a Marxist, and the dims, will just get away with more and more, a line in the sand must be ours, and no one should be cowed by the left!


79 posted on 03/14/2009 5:12:59 PM PDT by Turborules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
Logic and the process of elimination, my friend:

Is it money?
He has spent far more money, on MANY cases, that would have gone away if he had simply produced the documents in question.
Annoyance? This would only apply if the documents in question had NO relevance to the cause of action. That is NOT the case either.
Oppression? He is the POTUS for Heaven's sake! It is not like we have harassed a single mother or a little old lady on a fixed income!

So, Obama has stated, in Court, for all to see, that production of actual DOCUMENTS about his past would “embarrass” Obama -—

And THIS from a man whose fame and political career sprang from writing two books about himself?

80 posted on 03/14/2009 5:13:57 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson