I won !!!
Posted on 03/14/2009 2:50:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
(1) At the time of the November 4 election, Obama’ eligibility was unknown to the majority of the American electorate. That is, the vast majority of the American electorate did not know whether Obama was eligible to become the President of the United States (POTUS).
Furthermore Obama’s eligibility remains unknown, even to Americans who are very interested in this question, and have inquired deeply into it. When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence. Thus, the US citizenry did not know on November 4 if Obama was eligible, and they still do not know.
(2) Among the US citizenry are the following: The current POTUS The current VPOTUS & President of the Senate The US Supreme Court The US Congress The Senior Staff of the Pentagon The Senior Staff of the Federal Elections Commission The Members of the Electoral College
To best of my knowledge, none of these individuals have officially and publicly declared Obama to be eligible to be POTUS. They have not produced or provided sufficient evidence to prove this eligibility.
(3) The news media, television, radio, and the Internet transmit huge amounts of information each day. However, to the best of my knowledge the eligibility of Obama to be POTUS is not known by the general public (See Note 1).
Method of formal logic (4) Until and if that dissemination occurs, there is a method of formal logic that can be applied to this situation. It is called the Categorical Syllogism, and was described by Aristotle (Prior Analytics, 24b18-20). Ordinarily, a categorical syllogism is simply called a syllogism, as I shall do here.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
How would you like to be chosen to make that document?
You would be wearing cement shoes right after handing the document to him.Little blip in the news about a printer found submerged in the river wearing Herman Munsters boots.
To my understanding the statement was made by a defense attorney in the NC eligibility case, Sullivan v. Marshall, that was brought by Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan against NC Secretary Of State Elain Marshall. The case has since been dismissed on lack of standing.
Yeah, it sure would be embarrassing if he couldn't produce documents showing he was a natural born citizen, wouldn't it?
I like your tag line, too.
II. Discussion
Rule 26(c)(1) authorizes the Court to enter a protective order to protect a party
“from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” including an
order forbidding the discovery or specifying terms for discovery. “While the court should
not automatically stay discovery because a motion to dismiss has been filed, ‘a stay is
proper where the likelihood that such motion may result in a narrowing or an outright
elimination of discovery outweighs the likely harm to be produced by the delay.’” 19th
St. Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345, 349 (E.D. Pa. 2000),
quoting Weisman v. Mediq, Inc., 1955 WL 273678, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5900 *2 (E.D.
Pa. 1995). “Where a pending motion to dismiss may dispose of the entire action and
where discovery is not needed to rule on such motion, the balance generally favors
granting a motion to stay.” Weisman, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *5.
All Court filings from Berg and Obama can be found at this website:
inquiring minds want to know...
minds full of mush dont.
USURPER. That’s why this “presidency” is “historic”. Fuhrer Obama is the biggest scammer EVER.
I see. Which qualification would you prefer he be thrown out on? Maybe he is really 34 years old, would that be a good enough reason or is it that this Natural Born issue is too complicated so we should just set that aside. Is that what your really trying to say?
“Syllogisms: a logical scheme of a formal argument of a major and minor premise and a conclusion which MUST be true if the premise is true.”
“The conclusion of this syllogism is self-evident because it merely requires the combination of two correct premises to produce a correct conclusion.”
“The syllogism is compelling, omnipresent, and transcendent in time.”
“Major Premise: To be POTUS, the candidates eligibility must be publicly known.
Minor Premise: Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known.”
All of Obama’s records, including COLB, have been sealed.
“This syllogism responds only to rules of deductive logic and cannot be overturned by any human action. If the premises are taken to be true, then the conclusion must be true.”
According to the laws of logic and reason, and the laws of the universe, Obama is not POTUS...
And you pulled your head out of the sand to post this?
He’ll outsource the making of his “real, authentic” long birth certificate to North Korea. They’ve got real authentic experts there. Some of the dollar bills in your wallet might have traveled from them.
NO sane person would spend almost a million to cover up these documents if they were indeed qualified to be POTUS.
Pinger
I do not read from this that Obama through his filings claims to be trying to avoid embarrassment. It could be one or more of the things listed, but not necessarily all of them at once (IANAL).
The problem is that Major Premise.
Totally right on...this is still a valid qualification standard that must not be left standing with a Marxist, and the dims, will just get away with more and more, a line in the sand must be ours, and no one should be cowed by the left!
Is it money?
He has spent far more money, on MANY cases, that would have gone away if he had simply produced the documents in question.
Annoyance? This would only apply if the documents in question had NO relevance to the cause of action. That is NOT the case either.
Oppression? He is the POTUS for Heaven's sake! It is not like we have harassed a single mother or a little old lady on a fixed income!
So, Obama has stated, in Court, for all to see, that production of actual DOCUMENTS about his past would “embarrass” Obama -—
And THIS from a man whose fame and political career sprang from writing two books about himself?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.