Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cramer: Obama’s ‘Radical Agenda Greatest Wealth Destruction I’ve Seen’
FinkelBlog ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 03/03/2009 5:01:48 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

Jim Cramer is a man of the markets. But he’s also a self-confessed Democrat. So when he pulverizes the president’s plans, there’s no partisan impulse in play.

On this morning’s Today, Cramer described President Obama as having a “radical agenda” that is “the greatest wealth destruction I’ve seen by a president.”

A bit later, Cramer foresaw the possibility of a depression, and called on the president to mend his ways.

View video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho2009; bhoeconomy; democrats; depression; economy; fundedbysoros; jimcramer; obama; obamanomics; porkulus; schifflist; sorocrats; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: Galtoid

They would still vote for him. This country has been sliding in that direction for some time when conservatives abandoned the arts, education and information media to the left. The result is a brainwashed mass of people who like zombies will still pull the lever for him. He still has an 58% approval rate. While that is the lowest of any president at this stage it still shows that 50% +1 would still vote for him.


81 posted on 03/03/2009 4:24:28 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Cramer is giving Obama cover by pretending that he opposes the program and making us think there are some democrats that oppose our move to utopia.


82 posted on 03/03/2009 4:26:52 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

I hear ya, and like you, I’m glad the ‘rats are getting “impacted” by Zero’s actions. This is EXACTLY what Rush meant about hoping Zero would fail.


83 posted on 03/03/2009 5:10:42 PM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
>”UNBELIEVEABLE”<

Yup. -what makes Cramer any different then the “3 blind mice”? Nothing as far as I can see.
All a bunch of liars, and as you say; a total waste of time to watch any of them. Why would anyone look to this guy for investment advice? sheesh.

84 posted on 03/03/2009 5:14:32 PM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
>”Remember that in 1993 many republicans called Clinton a Marxist. But Clinton working with a Newt congress had a pretty successful presidency economically. But a Marxist like Obama with Marxist Pelosi congress should have been a predictable disaster. They thought Obama was Clinton. Obama only flim flammed like Clinton, but Clinton really wanted to fix the economy and was a capitalist.”<

Your theory is as good as anyones.

Clinton had Newt and Company to reign his socialist tendencies in. Obama has a majority of cheerleaders and sycophants in congress.

85 posted on 03/03/2009 5:19:32 PM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FBD

If Clinton had kept his congress for 4 more years till 98 history would be different. Clinton was great at taking credit got Republicans best successes while playing as defending liberals against Newt.


86 posted on 03/03/2009 5:46:24 PM PST by sickoflibs (Keynesian Economics : "If you won't spend your money WE WILL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; All

Very good thread. Thanks to all posters. BTTT!


87 posted on 03/03/2009 5:49:11 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid

Florida also has a lot of seniors who live on pensions. The obama economy will not be kind to people on fixed incomes


88 posted on 03/03/2009 6:49:25 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Cramer: what a total phony.


89 posted on 03/03/2009 8:19:43 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
Cramer: what a total phony.

Cramer just got mugged.

90 posted on 03/03/2009 8:21:40 PM PST by Walmartian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Cramer was a democrat/Obama booklicker.

Why any financial person would be a democrat is a puzzle to me...

91 posted on 03/03/2009 8:25:19 PM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
RE :”Why any financial person would be a democrat is a puzzle to me...”

See #56. Democrats ran on wonderful 90s economy calling it Clintons and he probably believed it. And don't discount disgust with Bush. Cramer was on MSNBC Hardball yesterday claiming he still wants taxes on the rich someday, but not until a recovery and Obama needs to stop talking about punishing success now, sound familiar??

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2198015/posts?page=56#56

92 posted on 03/04/2009 5:05:18 AM PST by sickoflibs (Keynesian Economics : "If you won't spend your money WE WILL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
That theory goes that Cramer and other democrats disgusted with Bush believed Obama’s Reagan-like rhetoric and did not realize what a Marxist he really is.

How stupid could Cramer be? All he had to do was look at Obama's liberal voting record in the Senate...

93 posted on 03/04/2009 5:08:54 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
RE “How stupid could Cramer be? All he had to do was look at Obama’s liberal voting record in the Senate...

I dont want to defend Cramer because I am with you on that and used to get mad at him for this last year, but people were sick of Bush (for good reason) and looking back to 1990s, over 10 years ago, it was easy to romanticize the period. Again, Clinton had Newt and Clinton was from a southern state, Obama has Pelosi and Obama is from a super liberal corrupt state. So Obama+Pelosi+a clueless quite stupid public = disaster

94 posted on 03/04/2009 5:19:27 AM PST by sickoflibs (Keynesian Economics : "If you won't spend your money WE WILL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

These liberal millionaires who voted for Obama deserve to lose money.

All I needed to know was that Obama voted against the Born Alive bill. That is real evil....


95 posted on 03/04/2009 5:49:56 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: usmom
Wow, people are actually beginning to see it and say it out loud.

Yes, and this is less than two months into his administration.

He will have a short honeymoon before his adorers turn on him.

96 posted on 03/05/2009 7:43:17 PM PST by happygrl (BORG: Barack 0bama Resistance Group: we will not be assimilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson