Posted on 03/03/2009 5:01:48 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Jim Cramer is a man of the markets. But he’s also a self-confessed Democrat. So when he pulverizes the president’s plans, there’s no partisan impulse in play.
On this morning’s Today, Cramer described President Obama as having a “radical agenda” that is “the greatest wealth destruction I’ve seen by a president.”
A bit later, Cramer foresaw the possibility of a depression, and called on the president to mend his ways.
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...
They would still vote for him. This country has been sliding in that direction for some time when conservatives abandoned the arts, education and information media to the left. The result is a brainwashed mass of people who like zombies will still pull the lever for him. He still has an 58% approval rate. While that is the lowest of any president at this stage it still shows that 50% +1 would still vote for him.
Cramer is giving Obama cover by pretending that he opposes the program and making us think there are some democrats that oppose our move to utopia.
I hear ya, and like you, I’m glad the ‘rats are getting “impacted” by Zero’s actions. This is EXACTLY what Rush meant about hoping Zero would fail.
Yup. -what makes Cramer any different then the “3 blind mice”? Nothing as far as I can see.
All a bunch of liars, and as you say; a total waste of time to watch any of them. Why would anyone look to this guy for investment advice? sheesh.
Your theory is as good as anyones.
Clinton had Newt and Company to reign his socialist tendencies in. Obama has a majority of cheerleaders and sycophants in congress.
If Clinton had kept his congress for 4 more years till 98 history would be different. Clinton was great at taking credit got Republicans best successes while playing as defending liberals against Newt.
Very good thread. Thanks to all posters. BTTT!
Florida also has a lot of seniors who live on pensions. The obama economy will not be kind to people on fixed incomes
Cramer: what a total phony.
Cramer just got mugged.
Why any financial person would be a democrat is a puzzle to me...
See #56. Democrats ran on wonderful 90s economy calling it Clintons and he probably believed it. And don't discount disgust with Bush. Cramer was on MSNBC Hardball yesterday claiming he still wants taxes on the rich someday, but not until a recovery and Obama needs to stop talking about punishing success now, sound familiar??
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2198015/posts?page=56#56
How stupid could Cramer be? All he had to do was look at Obama's liberal voting record in the Senate...
I dont want to defend Cramer because I am with you on that and used to get mad at him for this last year, but people were sick of Bush (for good reason) and looking back to 1990s, over 10 years ago, it was easy to romanticize the period. Again, Clinton had Newt and Clinton was from a southern state, Obama has Pelosi and Obama is from a super liberal corrupt state. So Obama+Pelosi+a clueless quite stupid public = disaster
These liberal millionaires who voted for Obama deserve to lose money.
All I needed to know was that Obama voted against the Born Alive bill. That is real evil....
Yes, and this is less than two months into his administration.
He will have a short honeymoon before his adorers turn on him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.