Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
>”Remember that in 1993 many republicans called Clinton a Marxist. But Clinton working with a Newt congress had a pretty successful presidency economically. But a Marxist like Obama with Marxist Pelosi congress should have been a predictable disaster. They thought Obama was Clinton. Obama only flim flammed like Clinton, but Clinton really wanted to fix the economy and was a capitalist.”<

Your theory is as good as anyones.

Clinton had Newt and Company to reign his socialist tendencies in. Obama has a majority of cheerleaders and sycophants in congress.

85 posted on 03/03/2009 5:19:32 PM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: FBD

If Clinton had kept his congress for 4 more years till 98 history would be different. Clinton was great at taking credit got Republicans best successes while playing as defending liberals against Newt.


86 posted on 03/03/2009 5:46:24 PM PST by sickoflibs (Keynesian Economics : "If you won't spend your money WE WILL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson