Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Change: The First Three Weeks (It's worse than you thought alert)
American Thinker ^ | February 10, 2009 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 02/10/2009 12:19:15 AM PST by Zakeet

Far be it from me to criticize Barack Obama before he's even had a chance to rule. Well, he's had almost three weeks in office as I write, and some patterns are beginning to emerge. Here is a list of accomplishments 20 days into President Obama's first term.

Prior to taking office.

January 21. Day One in office, or "Clean Government Day."

January 22, "Be Nice To Terrorists Day."

January 23, "Be Nice To Abortionists Day."

January 26, "Help the US Automobile Industry Go Broke Quicker Day."

January 27, "Be Nice to Terrorist Lovers and Tax Cheats Day."

January 28, "Bipartisan Schmipartisan Day."

January 29, "No Statute of Limitations on Anything Day."

January 30, "Payback the Unions and Keep Joe Busy Day."

February 3, "Being President is Hard Day."

February 4, "More Socialized Medicine Day."

February 5, "Community Organizing, Low-Flow Coffee-Makers and Trade-War Day."

February 6. "Be Even Nicer to Unions and Terrorists Day."

February 8. "Republican Moderates to the Rescue of the Rescue Day."

I should also report on the progress of the Democratic Congress. Here is what the House did already in 2009:

President Obama also said many words in these first 20 days: press conferences, speeches and op-ed pieces, but I left these out of the above list in order to concentrate on actions rather than words. (To my knowledge, Obama did not complete another autobiography in the last three weeks.)

I probably missed a few things, but I think you get the drift. Undo whatever Bush did. Expect appointees to obey the law, with a mulligan given for first-time offenses less than $128,000. Pay back Democratic special interests like unions, trial lawyers and Planned Parenthood. Define "bipartisanship" as inviting Republicans to lunch and telling them, "I won." Spend really, really huge amounts of other people's money. Make terrorism a law enforcement issue instead of a national defense issue. And watch terrorists and nuclear proliferators be released, from Pakistan to Yemen to Gitmo.

President Obama has lived up to my expectations.

I believe these first 21 days could best be summarized in the immortal words of Mark Steyn, who said, "We have nothing to hope for but hope itself."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abovemypaygrade; agenda; bho44; bhoeo; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; economy; first100days; foreignaffairs; miserablefailure; obama; obamascandals; worst100days
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

I'm going to shatter Peanut-Head's old record

1 posted on 02/10/2009 12:19:15 AM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I believe these first 21 days could best be summarized in the immortal words of Mark Steyn, who said, "We have nothing to hope for but hope itself."

***************************************** Pretty much says it all.

2 posted on 02/10/2009 12:23:30 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
He is a citizen of Qatar, but was arrested in Peoria, Illinois, because, according to the New York Times , "government officials contended that he was an al-Qaeda sleeper agent, sent to the US to commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system."

Barney Frank is an al-Qaeda agent?

3 posted on 02/10/2009 12:28:59 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Jimmy Carter -- the first white Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

bump


4 posted on 02/10/2009 12:46:15 AM PST by GeronL (please stand by...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
For your ping list.


5 posted on 02/10/2009 12:48:02 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Bookmark


6 posted on 02/10/2009 12:53:33 AM PST by Pinkbell (Liberals are only tolerant of those with whom they agree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Excellent, highly-detailed summary.

I have been saying for months now that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than Idi Amin Version 2.0.

And our Nation is nothing more than a larger version of Jonestown ripe for mind control.

The Obamatrons are all fools.

7 posted on 02/10/2009 1:00:15 AM PST by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
This bears repeating:

I believe these first 21 days could best be summarized in the immortal words of Mark Steyn, who said, "We have nothing to hope for but hope itself."

8 posted on 02/10/2009 1:08:13 AM PST by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

thank you for letting us read bambam’s diary


9 posted on 02/10/2009 1:10:26 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

bookmark


10 posted on 02/10/2009 1:12:39 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

As usual, t-shirts available...

11 posted on 02/10/2009 1:29:27 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Very nice listing. If Obama were getting the scrutiny George Bush did, there would be calls for his impeachment by now.

Even something as simple as a press conference, can’t be handled without trickery.

Today’s press conference was a tightly controlled affair with only approved reporters getting selected to ask questions. Obama read from a list, who was to be called on next. He didn’t call one person that wasn’t on the list.

I have not seen one press conference like this in the 39 years since I registered to vote. Presidents generally provide a short statement, then accept questions. When they accept questions, they look for a reporter with his/her hand raised, and they call on them.

This didn’t take place today. Obama read names, then asked where the reporter was. Then he would ramble on for up to fifteen minutes with an answer that sounded more like a ten year old’s description of why he didn’t do his homework.

He hemmed and hawed, rambled, lectured, switched focus every 20 to 60 seconds, and offered up half truths and outright lies. He monopolized the time such that only three questions were asked in the first half hour of the dog n pony show.

BO still provides no more intellect during his public statements than a ten year old child. He can’t focus. He can’t tell the truth, or simply hasn’t the tools to remember what the facts are.

This guy is completely out of his depth, and the media that covers for him is beginning to look positively pathetic on top of being lap dogs.

If Reagan had refused to respond to raised hands, if Bush had used the sorry ass tactics that Obama did today, the press would have ripped them to shreds. Instead they’ll wax on about how brilliant Obama is. Well, it does take some ability to be able to completely snow the deaf, blind, and dumb MSM players in attendance today. There’s Obama’s way to do this, and then there’s Ronald Reagan’s way, actually respond to frank questions with gifted responses.

Obama is a sad pathetic shadow of a leader. No amount of propaganda is going to be able to support this man, hiding how inadequate he is.

Short of putting goose stepping troops on the streets to ensure control, Obama and the nation’s media are heading into very dark territory. Everyone expects politics. Nobody expects the level of subterfuge that is taking place with regard to this administration, and their mismanagement of the nation.

There are some obvious questions that need to be asked after today’s pathetic excuse for a press conference.

Were only certain ‘friendly’ reporters called on?
Is Obama afraid to take spontaneous questions from a variety of reporters?
Were questions submitted in advance? I ask this, because several of those questions sounded like they were teed up for Mr. Pipsqueak himself, “Number 18 and the Pride of the Marxist Media, it’s Barack Obamaaaaaa!”

I don’t know what today’s performance was, but it wasn’t the run of the mill press conference.


12 posted on 02/10/2009 1:32:36 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Bipartisainship is now about a 3 to 532 vote on Capital Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prole

jes’wait’til’ya’see him in yer’local kebab shop


13 posted on 02/10/2009 1:48:33 AM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Off Hunting--- for the COLB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
BO still provides no more intellect during his public statements than a ten year old child. He can’t focus. He can’t tell the truth, or simply hasn’t the tools to remember what the facts are.

This guy is completely out of his depth, and the media that covers for him is beginning to look positively pathetic on top of being lap dogs.

I have to disagree. The lack of focus is intentional, as is the refusal to talk about details. He may not be up to speed on process (he'll leave the humdrum details to his underlings), but he is total agreement with the goals (about which he can't be honest), and he intends to exert an ever-increasing executive control over all. He has utter contempt for the intelligence of the public and the media, and relies on aura of cocky authoritarianism and sophistry to lull the masses.

To say he's out of his depth is to give him an excuse for the assault on freedom that he's directing.

14 posted on 02/10/2009 1:59:27 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

“To say he’s out of his depth is to give him an excuse for the assault on freedom that he’s directing. “

I am not sure that he himself is directing it. I think he is a tool; a puppet. But he is complicit.


15 posted on 02/10/2009 2:03:48 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I have to disagree. The lack of focus is intentional, as is the refusal to talk about details. He may not be up to speed on process (he'll leave the humdrum details to his underlings), but he is total agreement with the goals (about which he can't be honest), and he intends to exert an ever-increasing executive control over all. He has utter contempt for the intelligence of the public and the media, and relies on aura of cocky authoritarianism and sophistry to lull the masses.

I appreciate the difference of opinion, but let's be frank here. Obama is the consummate void. He comes out and advances these programs, but these programs were dictated to him. Sure he may agree, but he isn't up to speed enough, and doesn't have the adult stature that is require to pull this off.

He never had that ability. He's the equivalent of a news reader. He reads his teleprompter just fine. Take it away and this guy is a simpleton. I talk of him as if he were a child, because in reality, he is. He is the equivalent of a ten year old boy acting out in his parents drawing room, while his parents do nothing and query guests if he isn't the cutest thing they've ever seen. Well, no he isn't. He's a impudent bore. The media that plays the role of parent here, is a misguided, propagandist entity, being hoodwinked by people that would knife them in the back for a pack of cigarettes.

To say he's out of his depth is to give him an excuse for the assault on freedom that he's directing.

He is complicit. He is not in control. He even has to ask what the bills he is signing actually do. I don't give him cover here. He damns himself in ways that I couldn't cover for. I am simply heralding what is taking place here as I see it.

16 posted on 02/10/2009 2:10:18 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Bipartisainship is now about a 3 to 532 vote on Capital Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

HA HA... the title of your post is exactly what I was thinking earlier today. It took Bush 6 mos to screw up this much.


17 posted on 02/10/2009 2:13:26 AM PST by montesquiue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

/mark


18 posted on 02/10/2009 2:13:54 AM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

John McCutcheon wrote a song slamming Bush II called There’s a boob on our TV, I think we all agree it is more appropriate to this goof.


19 posted on 02/10/2009 2:24:10 AM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Good stuff (the writings, I mean) - I hope the writer continues this.


20 posted on 02/10/2009 2:30:17 AM PST by meyer (The left is flooding the ship - let's quit bailing water. We are all John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson